A comparison of four clustering methods for brain expression microarray data
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>DNA microarrays, which determine the expression levels of tens of thousands of genes from a sample, are an important research tool. However, the volume of data they produce can be an obstacle to interpretation of the results. Cluster...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2008-11-01
|
| Series: | BMC Bioinformatics |
| Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/9/490 |
| _version_ | 1818148007845036032 |
|---|---|
| author | Owen Michael J O'Donovan Michael C Holmans Peter Richards Alexander L Jones Lesley |
| author_facet | Owen Michael J O'Donovan Michael C Holmans Peter Richards Alexander L Jones Lesley |
| author_sort | Owen Michael J |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>DNA microarrays, which determine the expression levels of tens of thousands of genes from a sample, are an important research tool. However, the volume of data they produce can be an obstacle to interpretation of the results. Clustering the genes on the basis of similarity of their expression profiles can simplify the data, and potentially provides an important source of biological inference, but these methods have not been tested systematically on datasets from complex human tissues. In this paper, four clustering methods, CRC, k-means, ISA and memISA, are used upon three brain expression datasets. The results are compared on speed, gene coverage and GO enrichment. The effects of combining the clusters produced by each method are also assessed.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>k-means outperforms the other methods, with 100% gene coverage and GO enrichments only slightly exceeded by memISA and ISA. Those two methods produce greater GO enrichments on the datasets used, but at the cost of much lower gene coverage, fewer clusters produced, and speed. The clusters they find are largely different to those produced by k-means. Combining clusters produced by k-means and memISA or ISA leads to increased GO enrichment and number of clusters produced (compared to k-means alone), without negatively impacting gene coverage. memISA can also find potentially disease-related clusters. In two independent dorsolateral prefrontal cortex datasets, it finds three overlapping clusters that are either enriched for genes associated with schizophrenia, genes differentially expressed in schizophrenia, or both. Two of these clusters are enriched for genes of the MAP kinase pathway, suggesting a possible role for this pathway in the aetiology of schizophrenia.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Considered alone, k-means clustering is the most effective of the four methods on typical microarray brain expression datasets. However, memISA and ISA can add extra high-quality clusters to the set produced by k-means, so combining these three methods is the method of choice.</p> |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-11T12:44:18Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-3cb30db47f16460984c1b7341f84ded7 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1471-2105 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-11T12:44:18Z |
| publishDate | 2008-11-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMC Bioinformatics |
| spelling | doaj.art-3cb30db47f16460984c1b7341f84ded72022-12-22T01:06:52ZengBMCBMC Bioinformatics1471-21052008-11-019149010.1186/1471-2105-9-490A comparison of four clustering methods for brain expression microarray dataOwen Michael JO'Donovan Michael CHolmans PeterRichards Alexander LJones Lesley<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>DNA microarrays, which determine the expression levels of tens of thousands of genes from a sample, are an important research tool. However, the volume of data they produce can be an obstacle to interpretation of the results. Clustering the genes on the basis of similarity of their expression profiles can simplify the data, and potentially provides an important source of biological inference, but these methods have not been tested systematically on datasets from complex human tissues. In this paper, four clustering methods, CRC, k-means, ISA and memISA, are used upon three brain expression datasets. The results are compared on speed, gene coverage and GO enrichment. The effects of combining the clusters produced by each method are also assessed.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>k-means outperforms the other methods, with 100% gene coverage and GO enrichments only slightly exceeded by memISA and ISA. Those two methods produce greater GO enrichments on the datasets used, but at the cost of much lower gene coverage, fewer clusters produced, and speed. The clusters they find are largely different to those produced by k-means. Combining clusters produced by k-means and memISA or ISA leads to increased GO enrichment and number of clusters produced (compared to k-means alone), without negatively impacting gene coverage. memISA can also find potentially disease-related clusters. In two independent dorsolateral prefrontal cortex datasets, it finds three overlapping clusters that are either enriched for genes associated with schizophrenia, genes differentially expressed in schizophrenia, or both. Two of these clusters are enriched for genes of the MAP kinase pathway, suggesting a possible role for this pathway in the aetiology of schizophrenia.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Considered alone, k-means clustering is the most effective of the four methods on typical microarray brain expression datasets. However, memISA and ISA can add extra high-quality clusters to the set produced by k-means, so combining these three methods is the method of choice.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/9/490 |
| spellingShingle | Owen Michael J O'Donovan Michael C Holmans Peter Richards Alexander L Jones Lesley A comparison of four clustering methods for brain expression microarray data BMC Bioinformatics |
| title | A comparison of four clustering methods for brain expression microarray data |
| title_full | A comparison of four clustering methods for brain expression microarray data |
| title_fullStr | A comparison of four clustering methods for brain expression microarray data |
| title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of four clustering methods for brain expression microarray data |
| title_short | A comparison of four clustering methods for brain expression microarray data |
| title_sort | comparison of four clustering methods for brain expression microarray data |
| url | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/9/490 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT owenmichaelj acomparisonoffourclusteringmethodsforbrainexpressionmicroarraydata AT odonovanmichaelc acomparisonoffourclusteringmethodsforbrainexpressionmicroarraydata AT holmanspeter acomparisonoffourclusteringmethodsforbrainexpressionmicroarraydata AT richardsalexanderl acomparisonoffourclusteringmethodsforbrainexpressionmicroarraydata AT joneslesley acomparisonoffourclusteringmethodsforbrainexpressionmicroarraydata AT owenmichaelj comparisonoffourclusteringmethodsforbrainexpressionmicroarraydata AT odonovanmichaelc comparisonoffourclusteringmethodsforbrainexpressionmicroarraydata AT holmanspeter comparisonoffourclusteringmethodsforbrainexpressionmicroarraydata AT richardsalexanderl comparisonoffourclusteringmethodsforbrainexpressionmicroarraydata AT joneslesley comparisonoffourclusteringmethodsforbrainexpressionmicroarraydata |