History and Interpretation in the Fundamental Law of Hungary
(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2020 5(1), 161-174 | Article | (Table of Contents) I. Introduction. - II. Historical constitution. - III. Constitutional identity. - IV. Christian culture. - V. History and interpretation. - V.1. Achievements of the historical...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
European Papers (www.europeanpapers.eu)
2020-07-01
|
| Series: | European Papers |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.europeanpapers.eu/en/e-journal/history-and-interpretation-in-the-fundamental-law-of-hungary |
| _version_ | 1818428019547570176 |
|---|---|
| author | Miklós Könczöl István Kevevári |
| author_facet | Miklós Könczöl István Kevevári |
| author_sort | Miklós Könczöl |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | (Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2020 5(1), 161-174 | Article | (Table of Contents) I. Introduction. - II. Historical constitution. - III. Constitutional identity. - IV. Christian culture. - V. History and interpretation. - V.1. Achievements of the historical constitution. - V.2. Constitutional identity. - V.3. Christian culture. - VI. Conclusion: partisan tendencies and neutralising efforts. | (Abstract) This Article focuses on some of the rules of interpretation contained in the Fundamental Law of Hungary (Art. R), which, while not belonging to the class of "memory laws" in the strict sense, make use of certain historically charged concepts. These concepts, examined in the first part of the Article in turn, are 1) the "achievements of the historical constitution", 2) the "constitutional identity", and 3) the "Christian culture" of Hungary. It is argued that in terms of their substance, these are open to competing historical interpretations. The second part of the Article deals with the pragmatic aspect of these provisions, that is, 4) their functions in constitutional interpretation. Based on that, the conclusion summarises 5) the role and motivation of historicising concepts both from the perspective of the constitution-maker and that of constitutional lawyers. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-14T14:54:58Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-3cb430c9500d49889decefe3332162d3 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2499-8249 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-14T14:54:58Z |
| publishDate | 2020-07-01 |
| publisher | European Papers (www.europeanpapers.eu) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | European Papers |
| spelling | doaj.art-3cb430c9500d49889decefe3332162d32022-12-21T22:57:00ZengEuropean Papers (www.europeanpapers.eu)European Papers2499-82492020-07-012020 5116117410.15166/2499-8249/388History and Interpretation in the Fundamental Law of HungaryMiklós Könczöl0István Kevevári1HAS CSS Institute for Legal StudiesNational University of Public Service(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2020 5(1), 161-174 | Article | (Table of Contents) I. Introduction. - II. Historical constitution. - III. Constitutional identity. - IV. Christian culture. - V. History and interpretation. - V.1. Achievements of the historical constitution. - V.2. Constitutional identity. - V.3. Christian culture. - VI. Conclusion: partisan tendencies and neutralising efforts. | (Abstract) This Article focuses on some of the rules of interpretation contained in the Fundamental Law of Hungary (Art. R), which, while not belonging to the class of "memory laws" in the strict sense, make use of certain historically charged concepts. These concepts, examined in the first part of the Article in turn, are 1) the "achievements of the historical constitution", 2) the "constitutional identity", and 3) the "Christian culture" of Hungary. It is argued that in terms of their substance, these are open to competing historical interpretations. The second part of the Article deals with the pragmatic aspect of these provisions, that is, 4) their functions in constitutional interpretation. Based on that, the conclusion summarises 5) the role and motivation of historicising concepts both from the perspective of the constitution-maker and that of constitutional lawyers.https://www.europeanpapers.eu/en/e-journal/history-and-interpretation-in-the-fundamental-law-of-hungaryfundamental law of hungaryrule of lawhistorical constitutionconstitutional identitychristian cultureconstitutional interpretation |
| spellingShingle | Miklós Könczöl István Kevevári History and Interpretation in the Fundamental Law of Hungary European Papers fundamental law of hungary rule of law historical constitution constitutional identity christian culture constitutional interpretation |
| title | History and Interpretation in the Fundamental Law of Hungary |
| title_full | History and Interpretation in the Fundamental Law of Hungary |
| title_fullStr | History and Interpretation in the Fundamental Law of Hungary |
| title_full_unstemmed | History and Interpretation in the Fundamental Law of Hungary |
| title_short | History and Interpretation in the Fundamental Law of Hungary |
| title_sort | history and interpretation in the fundamental law of hungary |
| topic | fundamental law of hungary rule of law historical constitution constitutional identity christian culture constitutional interpretation |
| url | https://www.europeanpapers.eu/en/e-journal/history-and-interpretation-in-the-fundamental-law-of-hungary |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mikloskonczol historyandinterpretationinthefundamentallawofhungary AT istvankevevari historyandinterpretationinthefundamentallawofhungary |