EOG feature relevance determination for microsleep detection

Automatic relevance determination (ARD) was applied to two-channel EOG recordings for microsleep event (MSE) recognition. 10 s immediately before MSE and also before counterexamples of fatigued, but attentive driving were analysed. Two type of signal features were extracted: the maximum cross correl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Golz Martin, Wollner Sebastian, Sommer David, Schnieder Sebastian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2017-09-01
Series:Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/cdbme-2017-0053
_version_ 1797848750532591616
author Golz Martin
Wollner Sebastian
Sommer David
Schnieder Sebastian
author_facet Golz Martin
Wollner Sebastian
Sommer David
Schnieder Sebastian
author_sort Golz Martin
collection DOAJ
description Automatic relevance determination (ARD) was applied to two-channel EOG recordings for microsleep event (MSE) recognition. 10 s immediately before MSE and also before counterexamples of fatigued, but attentive driving were analysed. Two type of signal features were extracted: the maximum cross correlation (MaxCC) and logarithmic power spectral densities (PSD) averaged in spectral bands of 0.5 Hz width ranging between 0 and 8 Hz. Generalised learn-ing vector quantisation (GRLVQ) was used as ARD method to show the potential of feature reduction. This is compared to support-vector machines (SVM), in which the feature reduction plays a much smaller role. Cross validation yielded mean normalised relevancies of PSD features in the range of 1.6 – 4.9 % and 1.9 – 10.4 % for horizontal and vertical EOG, respectively. MaxCC relevancies were 0.002 – 0.006 % and 0.002 – 0.06 %, respectively. This shows that PSD features of vertical EOG are indispensable, whereas MaxCC can be neglected. Mean classification accuracies were estimated at 86.6±b 1.3 % and 92.3±b 0.2 % for GRLVQ and SVM, respectively. GRLVQ permits objective feature reduction by inclusion of all processing stages, but is not as accurate as SVM.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T18:32:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3cb5760b1f254b379e6cc3f5d9863092
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2364-5504
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T18:32:50Z
publishDate 2017-09-01
publisher De Gruyter
record_format Article
series Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering
spelling doaj.art-3cb5760b1f254b379e6cc3f5d98630922023-04-11T17:07:13ZengDe GruyterCurrent Directions in Biomedical Engineering2364-55042017-09-013226126410.1515/cdbme-2017-0053cdbme-2017-0053EOG feature relevance determination for microsleep detectionGolz Martin0Wollner Sebastian1Sommer David2Schnieder Sebastian3University of Applied Sciences Schmalkalden, Germany University of Applied Sciences Schmalkalden University of Applied Sciences Schmalkalden Institute of Experimental Psychophysio-logy GmbH, Düsseldorf, GermanyAutomatic relevance determination (ARD) was applied to two-channel EOG recordings for microsleep event (MSE) recognition. 10 s immediately before MSE and also before counterexamples of fatigued, but attentive driving were analysed. Two type of signal features were extracted: the maximum cross correlation (MaxCC) and logarithmic power spectral densities (PSD) averaged in spectral bands of 0.5 Hz width ranging between 0 and 8 Hz. Generalised learn-ing vector quantisation (GRLVQ) was used as ARD method to show the potential of feature reduction. This is compared to support-vector machines (SVM), in which the feature reduction plays a much smaller role. Cross validation yielded mean normalised relevancies of PSD features in the range of 1.6 – 4.9 % and 1.9 – 10.4 % for horizontal and vertical EOG, respectively. MaxCC relevancies were 0.002 – 0.006 % and 0.002 – 0.06 %, respectively. This shows that PSD features of vertical EOG are indispensable, whereas MaxCC can be neglected. Mean classification accuracies were estimated at 86.6±b 1.3 % and 92.3±b 0.2 % for GRLVQ and SVM, respectively. GRLVQ permits objective feature reduction by inclusion of all processing stages, but is not as accurate as SVM.https://doi.org/10.1515/cdbme-2017-0053automatic relevance determinationmicrosleepelectrooculographysupport-vector machines
spellingShingle Golz Martin
Wollner Sebastian
Sommer David
Schnieder Sebastian
EOG feature relevance determination for microsleep detection
Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering
automatic relevance determination
microsleep
electrooculography
support-vector machines
title EOG feature relevance determination for microsleep detection
title_full EOG feature relevance determination for microsleep detection
title_fullStr EOG feature relevance determination for microsleep detection
title_full_unstemmed EOG feature relevance determination for microsleep detection
title_short EOG feature relevance determination for microsleep detection
title_sort eog feature relevance determination for microsleep detection
topic automatic relevance determination
microsleep
electrooculography
support-vector machines
url https://doi.org/10.1515/cdbme-2017-0053
work_keys_str_mv AT golzmartin eogfeaturerelevancedeterminationformicrosleepdetection
AT wollnersebastian eogfeaturerelevancedeterminationformicrosleepdetection
AT sommerdavid eogfeaturerelevancedeterminationformicrosleepdetection
AT schniedersebastian eogfeaturerelevancedeterminationformicrosleepdetection