Comparative Study on the Crime of Ḥirābah According to Imam Abū Ḥanīfah and Imam Syāfi’ī

The crime of robbery (ḥirābah) is one of the crimes punishable by punishment (ḥadd). Some of the criminal provisions of ḥirābah by Imam Abū Ḥanīfah and Imam Syafi'i show differences of opinion that can affect aspects of criminal liability for the crime of ḥirābah. For example, regarding the pla...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Taufiq Ali Romdloni
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Negeri Semarang 2023-01-01
Series:Journal of Law and Legal Reform
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jllr/article/view/61311
_version_ 1797945246655447040
author Taufiq Ali Romdloni
author_facet Taufiq Ali Romdloni
author_sort Taufiq Ali Romdloni
collection DOAJ
description The crime of robbery (ḥirābah) is one of the crimes punishable by punishment (ḥadd). Some of the criminal provisions of ḥirābah by Imam Abū Ḥanīfah and Imam Syafi'i show differences of opinion that can affect aspects of criminal liability for the crime of ḥirābah. For example, regarding the place of ḥirābah, the legal status of ḥirābah perpetrators consisting of several people who conspired, and the legal status of female ḥirābah perpetrators. To be able to understand the two Imams' thoughts, it is necessary to have an in-depth understanding of how the method of determining the law of the two Imam’s is needed. This kind of investigation is done at libraries. Document studies are used as a method of data gathering in this study, and secondary data sources are used as the basis for analysis. The descriptive-analytic and comparative data analysis approach is applied. The findings of this research include First of all, according to Imam Syafii, the letter aw in Surah Al-Māidah verse 33 is meant for clarifications and specifics (bayān wa tafshil), so that punishment must be meted out in accordance with the deeds of Muḥārib. Imam Abū Ḥanīfah contends that since the letter aw is meant to represent option, judges should have the flexibility to select (takhyir) the most fitting sentence. Second, the criminal culpability component of jarmah ḥirābah may be impacted by the disagreement between Imam Abu Hanfah and Imam Syafi'i. Inadequate responses to this issue may leave gaps in the application of non-discriminatory laws.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T20:52:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3cbf38f2dc6249edaf7be7caebdebaea
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2715-0941
2715-0968
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T20:52:11Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Universitas Negeri Semarang
record_format Article
series Journal of Law and Legal Reform
spelling doaj.art-3cbf38f2dc6249edaf7be7caebdebaea2023-01-23T09:05:25ZengUniversitas Negeri SemarangJournal of Law and Legal Reform2715-09412715-09682023-01-014117320010.15294/jllr.v4i1.6131161311Comparative Study on the Crime of Ḥirābah According to Imam Abū Ḥanīfah and Imam Syāfi’īTaufiq Ali Romdloni0Pondok Pesantren Al-Ma'rufiyyahThe crime of robbery (ḥirābah) is one of the crimes punishable by punishment (ḥadd). Some of the criminal provisions of ḥirābah by Imam Abū Ḥanīfah and Imam Syafi'i show differences of opinion that can affect aspects of criminal liability for the crime of ḥirābah. For example, regarding the place of ḥirābah, the legal status of ḥirābah perpetrators consisting of several people who conspired, and the legal status of female ḥirābah perpetrators. To be able to understand the two Imams' thoughts, it is necessary to have an in-depth understanding of how the method of determining the law of the two Imam’s is needed. This kind of investigation is done at libraries. Document studies are used as a method of data gathering in this study, and secondary data sources are used as the basis for analysis. The descriptive-analytic and comparative data analysis approach is applied. The findings of this research include First of all, according to Imam Syafii, the letter aw in Surah Al-Māidah verse 33 is meant for clarifications and specifics (bayān wa tafshil), so that punishment must be meted out in accordance with the deeds of Muḥārib. Imam Abū Ḥanīfah contends that since the letter aw is meant to represent option, judges should have the flexibility to select (takhyir) the most fitting sentence. Second, the criminal culpability component of jarmah ḥirābah may be impacted by the disagreement between Imam Abu Hanfah and Imam Syafi'i. Inadequate responses to this issue may leave gaps in the application of non-discriminatory laws.https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jllr/article/view/61311ḥirābahimam abū ḥanīfahimam syāfi’īcrime of robbery
spellingShingle Taufiq Ali Romdloni
Comparative Study on the Crime of Ḥirābah According to Imam Abū Ḥanīfah and Imam Syāfi’ī
Journal of Law and Legal Reform
ḥirābah
imam abū ḥanīfah
imam syāfi’ī
crime of robbery
title Comparative Study on the Crime of Ḥirābah According to Imam Abū Ḥanīfah and Imam Syāfi’ī
title_full Comparative Study on the Crime of Ḥirābah According to Imam Abū Ḥanīfah and Imam Syāfi’ī
title_fullStr Comparative Study on the Crime of Ḥirābah According to Imam Abū Ḥanīfah and Imam Syāfi’ī
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study on the Crime of Ḥirābah According to Imam Abū Ḥanīfah and Imam Syāfi’ī
title_short Comparative Study on the Crime of Ḥirābah According to Imam Abū Ḥanīfah and Imam Syāfi’ī
title_sort comparative study on the crime of hirabah according to imam abu hanifah and imam syafi i
topic ḥirābah
imam abū ḥanīfah
imam syāfi’ī
crime of robbery
url https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jllr/article/view/61311
work_keys_str_mv AT taufiqaliromdloni comparativestudyonthecrimeofhirabahaccordingtoimamabuhanifahandimamsyafii