Variations in the polar cap area during intervals of substorm activity on 20-21 March 1990 deduced from AMIE convection patterns

The dynamic behaviour of the northern polar cap area is studied employing Northern Hemisphere electric potential patterns derived by the Assimilative Mapping of Ionospheric Electrodynamics (AMIE) procedure. The rate of change in area of the polar cap, which can be defined as the region of magnet...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J. R. Taylor, T. K. Yeoman, M. Lester, B. A. Emery, D. J. Knipp
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 1996-09-01
Series:Annales Geophysicae
Online Access:https://www.ann-geophys.net/14/879/1996/angeo-14-879-1996.pdf
_version_ 1818684536675893248
author J. R. Taylor
T. K. Yeoman
M. Lester
B. A. Emery
D. J. Knipp
author_facet J. R. Taylor
T. K. Yeoman
M. Lester
B. A. Emery
D. J. Knipp
author_sort J. R. Taylor
collection DOAJ
description The dynamic behaviour of the northern polar cap area is studied employing Northern Hemisphere electric potential patterns derived by the Assimilative Mapping of Ionospheric Electrodynamics (AMIE) procedure. The rate of change in area of the polar cap, which can be defined as the region of magnetospheric field lines open to the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF), has been calculated during two intervals when the IMF had an approximately constant southward component (1100–2200 UT, 20 March 1990 and 1300–2100 UT, 21 March 1990). The estimates of the polar cap area are based on the approximation of the polar cap boundary by the flow reversal boundary. The change in the polar cap area is then compared to the predicted expansion rate based on a simple application of Faraday\'s Law. Furthermore, timings of magnetospheric substorms are also related to changes in the polar cap area. Once the convection electric field reconfigures following a southward turning of the IMF, the growth rate of the observed polar cap boundary is consistent with that predicted by Faraday\'s Law. A delay of typically 20 min to 50 min is observed between a substorm expansion phase onset and a reduction in the polar cap area. Such a delay is consistent with a synthesis between the near Earth neutral line and current disruption models of magnetospheric substorms in which the dipolarisation in the magnetotail may act as a trigger for reconnection. These delays may represent a propagation time between near geosynchronous orbit dipolarisation and subsequent reconnection further down tail. We estimate, from these delays, that the neutral <i>X</i> line occurs between ~35R<sub>E</sub> and ~75R<sub>E</sub> downstream in the tail.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T10:52:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3cc66be80f9f4604ba0d083f18587e7d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0992-7689
1432-0576
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T10:52:12Z
publishDate 1996-09-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Annales Geophysicae
spelling doaj.art-3cc66be80f9f4604ba0d083f18587e7d2022-12-21T21:51:55ZengCopernicus PublicationsAnnales Geophysicae0992-76891432-05761996-09-011487988710.1007/s00585-996-0879-8Variations in the polar cap area during intervals of substorm activity on 20-21 March 1990 deduced from AMIE convection patternsJ. R. TaylorT. K. YeomanM. LesterB. A. EmeryD. J. KnippThe dynamic behaviour of the northern polar cap area is studied employing Northern Hemisphere electric potential patterns derived by the Assimilative Mapping of Ionospheric Electrodynamics (AMIE) procedure. The rate of change in area of the polar cap, which can be defined as the region of magnetospheric field lines open to the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF), has been calculated during two intervals when the IMF had an approximately constant southward component (1100–2200 UT, 20 March 1990 and 1300–2100 UT, 21 March 1990). The estimates of the polar cap area are based on the approximation of the polar cap boundary by the flow reversal boundary. The change in the polar cap area is then compared to the predicted expansion rate based on a simple application of Faraday\'s Law. Furthermore, timings of magnetospheric substorms are also related to changes in the polar cap area. Once the convection electric field reconfigures following a southward turning of the IMF, the growth rate of the observed polar cap boundary is consistent with that predicted by Faraday\'s Law. A delay of typically 20 min to 50 min is observed between a substorm expansion phase onset and a reduction in the polar cap area. Such a delay is consistent with a synthesis between the near Earth neutral line and current disruption models of magnetospheric substorms in which the dipolarisation in the magnetotail may act as a trigger for reconnection. These delays may represent a propagation time between near geosynchronous orbit dipolarisation and subsequent reconnection further down tail. We estimate, from these delays, that the neutral <i>X</i> line occurs between ~35R<sub>E</sub> and ~75R<sub>E</sub> downstream in the tail.https://www.ann-geophys.net/14/879/1996/angeo-14-879-1996.pdf
spellingShingle J. R. Taylor
T. K. Yeoman
M. Lester
B. A. Emery
D. J. Knipp
Variations in the polar cap area during intervals of substorm activity on 20-21 March 1990 deduced from AMIE convection patterns
Annales Geophysicae
title Variations in the polar cap area during intervals of substorm activity on 20-21 March 1990 deduced from AMIE convection patterns
title_full Variations in the polar cap area during intervals of substorm activity on 20-21 March 1990 deduced from AMIE convection patterns
title_fullStr Variations in the polar cap area during intervals of substorm activity on 20-21 March 1990 deduced from AMIE convection patterns
title_full_unstemmed Variations in the polar cap area during intervals of substorm activity on 20-21 March 1990 deduced from AMIE convection patterns
title_short Variations in the polar cap area during intervals of substorm activity on 20-21 March 1990 deduced from AMIE convection patterns
title_sort variations in the polar cap area during intervals of substorm activity on 20 21 march 1990 deduced from amie convection patterns
url https://www.ann-geophys.net/14/879/1996/angeo-14-879-1996.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jrtaylor variationsinthepolarcapareaduringintervalsofsubstormactivityon2021march1990deducedfromamieconvectionpatterns
AT tkyeoman variationsinthepolarcapareaduringintervalsofsubstormactivityon2021march1990deducedfromamieconvectionpatterns
AT mlester variationsinthepolarcapareaduringintervalsofsubstormactivityon2021march1990deducedfromamieconvectionpatterns
AT baemery variationsinthepolarcapareaduringintervalsofsubstormactivityon2021march1990deducedfromamieconvectionpatterns
AT djknipp variationsinthepolarcapareaduringintervalsofsubstormactivityon2021march1990deducedfromamieconvectionpatterns