Optimum position and orientation of handrail for sit-to-stand movement

The sit-to-stand (STS) movement is performed throughout the day, and providing handrails is one method of making the STS movement easy. However, designers may have determined the installation position of handrails using intuition and trial and error. The aim of this study is to determine the optimum...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Takanori CHIHARA, Naoko FUKUCHI, Akihiko SEO
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers 2015-08-01
Series:Journal of Advanced Mechanical Design, Systems, and Manufacturing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jamdsm/9/3/9_2015jamdsm0036/_pdf/-char/en
_version_ 1811292284138815488
author Takanori CHIHARA
Naoko FUKUCHI
Akihiko SEO
author_facet Takanori CHIHARA
Naoko FUKUCHI
Akihiko SEO
author_sort Takanori CHIHARA
collection DOAJ
description The sit-to-stand (STS) movement is performed throughout the day, and providing handrails is one method of making the STS movement easy. However, designers may have determined the installation position of handrails using intuition and trial and error. The aim of this study is to determine the optimum position and orientation of handrails by minimizing the quantified physical load of the STS movement. Twelve university students participated, and eight electromyograms (EMGs), namely, of the brachioradialis, flexor carpi ulnaris, extensor carpi radialis longus, latissimus dorsi, right and left rectus femoris, and right and left tibialis anterior, were recorded. Observations with handrails at various tilt angles and forward distances from the edge of the seat were analyzed for the optimization. The total physical load (TPL) function was formulated as the weighted sum of the EMGs. The weight coefficients were determined by maximizing the correlation coefficient between the measured subjective scores and the TPL function values. The result shows that the handrail installation position significantly affects all of the EMGs except those of the right and left rectus femoris. The weight coefficients of the TPL function are positive for the upper limb muscles, whereas they are zero for the lower limb muscles. The handrail position for multiple users was formulated to minimize the TPL function, and hence the optimum position was determined.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T04:43:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3cc687c476e74ff386901dc739ab6fba
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1881-3054
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T04:43:07Z
publishDate 2015-08-01
publisher The Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers
record_format Article
series Journal of Advanced Mechanical Design, Systems, and Manufacturing
spelling doaj.art-3cc687c476e74ff386901dc739ab6fba2022-12-22T03:01:55ZengThe Japan Society of Mechanical EngineersJournal of Advanced Mechanical Design, Systems, and Manufacturing1881-30542015-08-0193JAMDSM0036JAMDSM003610.1299/jamdsm.2015jamdsm0036jamdsmOptimum position and orientation of handrail for sit-to-stand movementTakanori CHIHARA0Naoko FUKUCHI1Akihiko SEO2Faculty of System Design, Tokyo Metropolitan UniversityGraduate School of System Design, Tokyo Metropolitan UniversityFaculty of System Design, Tokyo Metropolitan UniversityThe sit-to-stand (STS) movement is performed throughout the day, and providing handrails is one method of making the STS movement easy. However, designers may have determined the installation position of handrails using intuition and trial and error. The aim of this study is to determine the optimum position and orientation of handrails by minimizing the quantified physical load of the STS movement. Twelve university students participated, and eight electromyograms (EMGs), namely, of the brachioradialis, flexor carpi ulnaris, extensor carpi radialis longus, latissimus dorsi, right and left rectus femoris, and right and left tibialis anterior, were recorded. Observations with handrails at various tilt angles and forward distances from the edge of the seat were analyzed for the optimization. The total physical load (TPL) function was formulated as the weighted sum of the EMGs. The weight coefficients were determined by maximizing the correlation coefficient between the measured subjective scores and the TPL function values. The result shows that the handrail installation position significantly affects all of the EMGs except those of the right and left rectus femoris. The weight coefficients of the TPL function are positive for the upper limb muscles, whereas they are zero for the lower limb muscles. The handrail position for multiple users was formulated to minimize the TPL function, and hence the optimum position was determined.https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jamdsm/9/3/9_2015jamdsm0036/_pdf/-char/energonomicsoptimal designelectromyographyhandrailsit-to-stand movement
spellingShingle Takanori CHIHARA
Naoko FUKUCHI
Akihiko SEO
Optimum position and orientation of handrail for sit-to-stand movement
Journal of Advanced Mechanical Design, Systems, and Manufacturing
ergonomics
optimal design
electromyography
handrail
sit-to-stand movement
title Optimum position and orientation of handrail for sit-to-stand movement
title_full Optimum position and orientation of handrail for sit-to-stand movement
title_fullStr Optimum position and orientation of handrail for sit-to-stand movement
title_full_unstemmed Optimum position and orientation of handrail for sit-to-stand movement
title_short Optimum position and orientation of handrail for sit-to-stand movement
title_sort optimum position and orientation of handrail for sit to stand movement
topic ergonomics
optimal design
electromyography
handrail
sit-to-stand movement
url https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jamdsm/9/3/9_2015jamdsm0036/_pdf/-char/en
work_keys_str_mv AT takanorichihara optimumpositionandorientationofhandrailforsittostandmovement
AT naokofukuchi optimumpositionandorientationofhandrailforsittostandmovement
AT akihikoseo optimumpositionandorientationofhandrailforsittostandmovement