An Assessment of the Relative Importance of Factors Impacting Surface UV Radiation Based on Simulations of the 6th Phase of the Coupled Intercomparison Project

Aerosols, ozone, surface reflectivity, and clouds are, among other factors, important for the modulation of UV radiation levels at the Earth’s surface. In this study, these variables were extracted from climate model integrations that contributed to CMIP6 and from MACC global reanalysis provided by...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anthi Chatzopoulou, Kleareti Tourpali, Alkiviadis F. Bais, Peter Braesicke, Roland Ruhnke
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-08-01
Series:Environmental Sciences Proceedings
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4931/26/1/119
_version_ 1797241093467668480
author Anthi Chatzopoulou
Kleareti Tourpali
Alkiviadis F. Bais
Peter Braesicke
Roland Ruhnke
author_facet Anthi Chatzopoulou
Kleareti Tourpali
Alkiviadis F. Bais
Peter Braesicke
Roland Ruhnke
author_sort Anthi Chatzopoulou
collection DOAJ
description Aerosols, ozone, surface reflectivity, and clouds are, among other factors, important for the modulation of UV radiation levels at the Earth’s surface. In this study, these variables were extracted from climate model integrations that contributed to CMIP6 and from MACC global reanalysis provided by the CAMS. From the 1950s until the end of the 21st century and for various shared socioeconomic pathways considered by CMIP6, we conclude that total ozone will increase globally in 2100 by up to 11% under SSP5–8.5 relative to the 1950s, while under SSP1–2.6, ozone is not projected to recover to pre-ozone depletion levels. AOD at 550 nm shows reductions in 2090–2100 over the Northern Hemisphere of up to −0.38. Compared to CAMS, CMIP6 models show a general overestimation for total ozone of up to 2.5% in extra-polar regions for models with interactive chemistry. This implies systematically lower UV radiation from models based on these projections.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T18:17:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3cc94aa73d3e49288a61c5bfc925f302
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2673-4931
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T18:17:51Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Environmental Sciences Proceedings
spelling doaj.art-3cc94aa73d3e49288a61c5bfc925f3022024-03-27T13:37:23ZengMDPI AGEnvironmental Sciences Proceedings2673-49312023-08-0126111910.3390/environsciproc2023026119An Assessment of the Relative Importance of Factors Impacting Surface UV Radiation Based on Simulations of the 6th Phase of the Coupled Intercomparison ProjectAnthi Chatzopoulou0Kleareti Tourpali1Alkiviadis F. Bais2Peter Braesicke3Roland Ruhnke4Laboratory of Atmospheric Physics, Physics Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, GreeceLaboratory of Atmospheric Physics, Physics Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, GreeceLaboratory of Atmospheric Physics, Physics Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, GreeceInstitute of Meteorology and Climate Research, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76021 Karlsruhe, GermanyInstitute of Meteorology and Climate Research, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76021 Karlsruhe, GermanyAerosols, ozone, surface reflectivity, and clouds are, among other factors, important for the modulation of UV radiation levels at the Earth’s surface. In this study, these variables were extracted from climate model integrations that contributed to CMIP6 and from MACC global reanalysis provided by the CAMS. From the 1950s until the end of the 21st century and for various shared socioeconomic pathways considered by CMIP6, we conclude that total ozone will increase globally in 2100 by up to 11% under SSP5–8.5 relative to the 1950s, while under SSP1–2.6, ozone is not projected to recover to pre-ozone depletion levels. AOD at 550 nm shows reductions in 2090–2100 over the Northern Hemisphere of up to −0.38. Compared to CAMS, CMIP6 models show a general overestimation for total ozone of up to 2.5% in extra-polar regions for models with interactive chemistry. This implies systematically lower UV radiation from models based on these projections.https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4931/26/1/119CMIP6ozonesurface reflectivityaerosolcloud modification factor
spellingShingle Anthi Chatzopoulou
Kleareti Tourpali
Alkiviadis F. Bais
Peter Braesicke
Roland Ruhnke
An Assessment of the Relative Importance of Factors Impacting Surface UV Radiation Based on Simulations of the 6th Phase of the Coupled Intercomparison Project
Environmental Sciences Proceedings
CMIP6
ozone
surface reflectivity
aerosol
cloud modification factor
title An Assessment of the Relative Importance of Factors Impacting Surface UV Radiation Based on Simulations of the 6th Phase of the Coupled Intercomparison Project
title_full An Assessment of the Relative Importance of Factors Impacting Surface UV Radiation Based on Simulations of the 6th Phase of the Coupled Intercomparison Project
title_fullStr An Assessment of the Relative Importance of Factors Impacting Surface UV Radiation Based on Simulations of the 6th Phase of the Coupled Intercomparison Project
title_full_unstemmed An Assessment of the Relative Importance of Factors Impacting Surface UV Radiation Based on Simulations of the 6th Phase of the Coupled Intercomparison Project
title_short An Assessment of the Relative Importance of Factors Impacting Surface UV Radiation Based on Simulations of the 6th Phase of the Coupled Intercomparison Project
title_sort assessment of the relative importance of factors impacting surface uv radiation based on simulations of the 6th phase of the coupled intercomparison project
topic CMIP6
ozone
surface reflectivity
aerosol
cloud modification factor
url https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4931/26/1/119
work_keys_str_mv AT anthichatzopoulou anassessmentoftherelativeimportanceoffactorsimpactingsurfaceuvradiationbasedonsimulationsofthe6thphaseofthecoupledintercomparisonproject
AT klearetitourpali anassessmentoftherelativeimportanceoffactorsimpactingsurfaceuvradiationbasedonsimulationsofthe6thphaseofthecoupledintercomparisonproject
AT alkiviadisfbais anassessmentoftherelativeimportanceoffactorsimpactingsurfaceuvradiationbasedonsimulationsofthe6thphaseofthecoupledintercomparisonproject
AT peterbraesicke anassessmentoftherelativeimportanceoffactorsimpactingsurfaceuvradiationbasedonsimulationsofthe6thphaseofthecoupledintercomparisonproject
AT rolandruhnke anassessmentoftherelativeimportanceoffactorsimpactingsurfaceuvradiationbasedonsimulationsofthe6thphaseofthecoupledintercomparisonproject
AT anthichatzopoulou assessmentoftherelativeimportanceoffactorsimpactingsurfaceuvradiationbasedonsimulationsofthe6thphaseofthecoupledintercomparisonproject
AT klearetitourpali assessmentoftherelativeimportanceoffactorsimpactingsurfaceuvradiationbasedonsimulationsofthe6thphaseofthecoupledintercomparisonproject
AT alkiviadisfbais assessmentoftherelativeimportanceoffactorsimpactingsurfaceuvradiationbasedonsimulationsofthe6thphaseofthecoupledintercomparisonproject
AT peterbraesicke assessmentoftherelativeimportanceoffactorsimpactingsurfaceuvradiationbasedonsimulationsofthe6thphaseofthecoupledintercomparisonproject
AT rolandruhnke assessmentoftherelativeimportanceoffactorsimpactingsurfaceuvradiationbasedonsimulationsofthe6thphaseofthecoupledintercomparisonproject