Effectiveness of automated appointment reminders in psychosis community services: a randomised controlled trial

We report on the first open-label, parallel group randomised controlled trial of automated appointment reminders in a psychosis community service in the UK. Ninety-five patients were randomly allocated to receiving/not receiving automated messaging reminders 7 days and 1 day before appointments. All...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eugenia Kravariti, Christopher Reeve-Mates, Rafaela Da Gama Pires, Elias Tsakanikos, Daniel Hayes, Siobhan Renshaw, Sarah McAllister, Vishal Bhavsar, Pam Patterson, Emily Daley, Jane Stewart, Megan Pritchard, Hitesh Shetty, Rosalind Ramsay, Rocio Perez-Iglesias, Philip McGuire
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2018-01-01
Series:BJPsych Open
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2056472417000072/type/journal_article
_version_ 1827995746065973248
author Eugenia Kravariti
Christopher Reeve-Mates
Rafaela Da Gama Pires
Elias Tsakanikos
Daniel Hayes
Siobhan Renshaw
Sarah McAllister
Vishal Bhavsar
Pam Patterson
Emily Daley
Jane Stewart
Megan Pritchard
Hitesh Shetty
Rosalind Ramsay
Rocio Perez-Iglesias
Philip McGuire
author_facet Eugenia Kravariti
Christopher Reeve-Mates
Rafaela Da Gama Pires
Elias Tsakanikos
Daniel Hayes
Siobhan Renshaw
Sarah McAllister
Vishal Bhavsar
Pam Patterson
Emily Daley
Jane Stewart
Megan Pritchard
Hitesh Shetty
Rosalind Ramsay
Rocio Perez-Iglesias
Philip McGuire
author_sort Eugenia Kravariti
collection DOAJ
description We report on the first open-label, parallel group randomised controlled trial of automated appointment reminders in a psychosis community service in the UK. Ninety-five patients were randomly allocated to receiving/not receiving automated messaging reminders 7 days and 1 day before appointments. All ‘Attended’ and ‘Missed’ appointment outcomes over 6 months were analysed using cluster regression analysis. Reminded appointments were significantly more frequently attended than non-reminded appointments (unadjusted odds ratio (OR) = 3.54, 95% CI 1.36–9.22, P = 0.01; adjusted OR = 2.95, 95% CI 1.05–8.85, P < 0.05). Automated messaging reminders can provide a robust strategy for promoting engagement with psychosis services.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T05:00:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3ccdefd484f54acb84ab3651703c069e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2056-4724
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T05:00:06Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series BJPsych Open
spelling doaj.art-3ccdefd484f54acb84ab3651703c069e2023-03-09T12:28:43ZengCambridge University PressBJPsych Open2056-47242018-01-014151710.1192/bjo.2017.7Effectiveness of automated appointment reminders in psychosis community services: a randomised controlled trialEugenia Kravariti0Christopher Reeve-Mates1Rafaela Da Gama Pires2Elias Tsakanikos3Daniel Hayes4Siobhan Renshaw5Sarah McAllister6Vishal Bhavsar7Pam Patterson8Emily Daley9Jane Stewart10Megan Pritchard11Hitesh Shetty12Rosalind Ramsay13Rocio Perez-Iglesias14Philip McGuire15King’s College London, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, London, UKKing’s College London, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, London, UKKing’s College London, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, London, UKUniversity of Roehampton, Department of Psychology, London, UKKing’s College London, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, London, UK, and Evidence Based Practice Unit, UCL and Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, London, UKBrunel University London, Department of Psychology, Middlesex, UKKing’s College London, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, London, UK, and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Kent, UKKing’s College London, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, London, UK, and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Kent, UKSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Kent, UKSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Kent, UKSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Kent, UKKing’s College London, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, London, UK, and The National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience at King’s College London, King’s Health Partners Academic Health Sciences Centre, London, UKThe National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience at King’s College London, King’s Health Partners Academic Health Sciences Centre, London, UKSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Kent, UKCIBERSAM: Centro Investigación Biomédica en Red Salud Mental, Santander, SpainKing’s College London, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, London, UK, and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Kent, UKWe report on the first open-label, parallel group randomised controlled trial of automated appointment reminders in a psychosis community service in the UK. Ninety-five patients were randomly allocated to receiving/not receiving automated messaging reminders 7 days and 1 day before appointments. All ‘Attended’ and ‘Missed’ appointment outcomes over 6 months were analysed using cluster regression analysis. Reminded appointments were significantly more frequently attended than non-reminded appointments (unadjusted odds ratio (OR) = 3.54, 95% CI 1.36–9.22, P = 0.01; adjusted OR = 2.95, 95% CI 1.05–8.85, P < 0.05). Automated messaging reminders can provide a robust strategy for promoting engagement with psychosis services.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2056472417000072/type/journal_article
spellingShingle Eugenia Kravariti
Christopher Reeve-Mates
Rafaela Da Gama Pires
Elias Tsakanikos
Daniel Hayes
Siobhan Renshaw
Sarah McAllister
Vishal Bhavsar
Pam Patterson
Emily Daley
Jane Stewart
Megan Pritchard
Hitesh Shetty
Rosalind Ramsay
Rocio Perez-Iglesias
Philip McGuire
Effectiveness of automated appointment reminders in psychosis community services: a randomised controlled trial
BJPsych Open
title Effectiveness of automated appointment reminders in psychosis community services: a randomised controlled trial
title_full Effectiveness of automated appointment reminders in psychosis community services: a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Effectiveness of automated appointment reminders in psychosis community services: a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of automated appointment reminders in psychosis community services: a randomised controlled trial
title_short Effectiveness of automated appointment reminders in psychosis community services: a randomised controlled trial
title_sort effectiveness of automated appointment reminders in psychosis community services a randomised controlled trial
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2056472417000072/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT eugeniakravariti effectivenessofautomatedappointmentremindersinpsychosiscommunityservicesarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT christopherreevemates effectivenessofautomatedappointmentremindersinpsychosiscommunityservicesarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT rafaeladagamapires effectivenessofautomatedappointmentremindersinpsychosiscommunityservicesarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT eliastsakanikos effectivenessofautomatedappointmentremindersinpsychosiscommunityservicesarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT danielhayes effectivenessofautomatedappointmentremindersinpsychosiscommunityservicesarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT siobhanrenshaw effectivenessofautomatedappointmentremindersinpsychosiscommunityservicesarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sarahmcallister effectivenessofautomatedappointmentremindersinpsychosiscommunityservicesarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vishalbhavsar effectivenessofautomatedappointmentremindersinpsychosiscommunityservicesarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT pampatterson effectivenessofautomatedappointmentremindersinpsychosiscommunityservicesarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT emilydaley effectivenessofautomatedappointmentremindersinpsychosiscommunityservicesarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT janestewart effectivenessofautomatedappointmentremindersinpsychosiscommunityservicesarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT meganpritchard effectivenessofautomatedappointmentremindersinpsychosiscommunityservicesarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hiteshshetty effectivenessofautomatedappointmentremindersinpsychosiscommunityservicesarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT rosalindramsay effectivenessofautomatedappointmentremindersinpsychosiscommunityservicesarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT rociopereziglesias effectivenessofautomatedappointmentremindersinpsychosiscommunityservicesarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT philipmcguire effectivenessofautomatedappointmentremindersinpsychosiscommunityservicesarandomisedcontrolledtrial