Clinical problems and outcome indicators in the expert consensus determined by the Delphi method of 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy for the treatment of oral potential malignant diseases

Objective To determine the clinical problems and outcome indicators that need to be included in the expert consensus of 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) photodynamic therapy in the treatment of oral potential malignant diseases. Methods Based on the relevant literature, the clinical problems and outcome...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: LIU Zijian, WANG Xing, HAN Ying, LIU Hongwei
Format: Article
Language:zho
Published: Editorial Department of Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases 2022-05-01
Series:口腔疾病防治
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.kqjbfz.com/CN/10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2022.05.004
_version_ 1818323301386158080
author LIU Zijian
WANG Xing
HAN Ying
LIU Hongwei
author_facet LIU Zijian
WANG Xing
HAN Ying
LIU Hongwei
author_sort LIU Zijian
collection DOAJ
description Objective To determine the clinical problems and outcome indicators that need to be included in the expert consensus of 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) photodynamic therapy in the treatment of oral potential malignant diseases. Methods Based on the relevant literature, the clinical problems and outcome indicators were drafted during the meeting. The Delphi method was used for expert consultation and expert opinion collection. The average and standard deviation of the voting results were calculated to determine the importance of the indicators, and the positive coefficient, variation coefficient and coordination coefficient were calculated for quality control. Results In the first round of the Delphi method, 12 outcome indicators (the main reference elements include photon integral flux, power density, illumination time, and spot diameter were identified; the specific parameters are photon integral flux of 100 J/cm2 and power density of 100-600 mW/cm2. A diode laser of (630 ± 5) nm wavelength should be chosen. The analgesic regimen is local anesthesia supplemented by hypothermia and intermittent laser irradiation before treatment. Lesions with hyperkeratotic require pretreatment. The concentration of ALA administered was set at 20%. Eight clinical problems (main reference elements of photodynamic irradiation dose, specific parameters, choice of light source, evaluation criteria of efficacy, prevention of adverse effects, dosing concentration, whether oral potentially malignant diseases with hyperkeratosis should be pretreated, administration of photosensitizers) were included according to the literature and expert discussion. In the second round, 89 experts completed the questionnaire and gave very important evaluations of 9 outcome indicators (the main reference elements included photon integral flux, power density and illumination time; the specific parameters were a photon integral flux of 100 J/cm 2 and a power density of 100-600 mW/cm2). A diode laser of (630 ± 5)nm wavelength should be chosen. The concentration of ALA administered was set at 20%. Six clinical problems (main reference elements of photodynamic irradiation dose, specific parameters, choice of light source, evaluation criteria of efficacy, dosing concentration, administration of photosensitizers), and the remaining 3 were given important evaluations, with good consistency. Conclusion In this study, the irradiation dose, mode of administration and concentration, evaluation criteria of efficacy, prevention of adverse effects and pretreatment regimen of ALA photodynamic therapy for oral potentially malignant diseases determined by the Delphi method had good agreement among experts.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T11:10:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3cce64a74b3343d7a56632439015a850
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2096-1456
language zho
last_indexed 2024-12-13T11:10:31Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher Editorial Department of Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases
record_format Article
series 口腔疾病防治
spelling doaj.art-3cce64a74b3343d7a56632439015a8502022-12-21T23:48:47ZzhoEditorial Department of Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases口腔疾病防治2096-14562022-05-0130533033710.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2022.05.004Clinical problems and outcome indicators in the expert consensus determined by the Delphi method of 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy for the treatment of oral potential malignant diseasesLIU Zijian0WANG Xing1HAN Ying2LIU Hongwei3Department of Oral Mucosa, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of StomatologyDepartment of Oral Mucosa, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of StomatologyDepartment of Oral Mucosa, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of StomatologyDepartment of Oral Mucosa, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of StomatologyObjective To determine the clinical problems and outcome indicators that need to be included in the expert consensus of 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) photodynamic therapy in the treatment of oral potential malignant diseases. Methods Based on the relevant literature, the clinical problems and outcome indicators were drafted during the meeting. The Delphi method was used for expert consultation and expert opinion collection. The average and standard deviation of the voting results were calculated to determine the importance of the indicators, and the positive coefficient, variation coefficient and coordination coefficient were calculated for quality control. Results In the first round of the Delphi method, 12 outcome indicators (the main reference elements include photon integral flux, power density, illumination time, and spot diameter were identified; the specific parameters are photon integral flux of 100 J/cm2 and power density of 100-600 mW/cm2. A diode laser of (630 ± 5) nm wavelength should be chosen. The analgesic regimen is local anesthesia supplemented by hypothermia and intermittent laser irradiation before treatment. Lesions with hyperkeratotic require pretreatment. The concentration of ALA administered was set at 20%. Eight clinical problems (main reference elements of photodynamic irradiation dose, specific parameters, choice of light source, evaluation criteria of efficacy, prevention of adverse effects, dosing concentration, whether oral potentially malignant diseases with hyperkeratosis should be pretreated, administration of photosensitizers) were included according to the literature and expert discussion. In the second round, 89 experts completed the questionnaire and gave very important evaluations of 9 outcome indicators (the main reference elements included photon integral flux, power density and illumination time; the specific parameters were a photon integral flux of 100 J/cm 2 and a power density of 100-600 mW/cm2). A diode laser of (630 ± 5)nm wavelength should be chosen. The concentration of ALA administered was set at 20%. Six clinical problems (main reference elements of photodynamic irradiation dose, specific parameters, choice of light source, evaluation criteria of efficacy, dosing concentration, administration of photosensitizers), and the remaining 3 were given important evaluations, with good consistency. Conclusion In this study, the irradiation dose, mode of administration and concentration, evaluation criteria of efficacy, prevention of adverse effects and pretreatment regimen of ALA photodynamic therapy for oral potentially malignant diseases determined by the Delphi method had good agreement among experts.http://www.kqjbfz.com/CN/10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2022.05.004delphi method,5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy,active oxygen,free radicals,potential malignant oral diseases,irradiation dose,efficacy evaluation,adverse reactions,
spellingShingle LIU Zijian
WANG Xing
HAN Ying
LIU Hongwei
Clinical problems and outcome indicators in the expert consensus determined by the Delphi method of 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy for the treatment of oral potential malignant diseases
口腔疾病防治
delphi method,
5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy,
active oxygen,
free radicals,
potential malignant oral diseases,
irradiation dose,
efficacy evaluation,
adverse reactions,
title Clinical problems and outcome indicators in the expert consensus determined by the Delphi method of 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy for the treatment of oral potential malignant diseases
title_full Clinical problems and outcome indicators in the expert consensus determined by the Delphi method of 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy for the treatment of oral potential malignant diseases
title_fullStr Clinical problems and outcome indicators in the expert consensus determined by the Delphi method of 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy for the treatment of oral potential malignant diseases
title_full_unstemmed Clinical problems and outcome indicators in the expert consensus determined by the Delphi method of 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy for the treatment of oral potential malignant diseases
title_short Clinical problems and outcome indicators in the expert consensus determined by the Delphi method of 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy for the treatment of oral potential malignant diseases
title_sort clinical problems and outcome indicators in the expert consensus determined by the delphi method of 5 aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy for the treatment of oral potential malignant diseases
topic delphi method,
5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy,
active oxygen,
free radicals,
potential malignant oral diseases,
irradiation dose,
efficacy evaluation,
adverse reactions,
url http://www.kqjbfz.com/CN/10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2022.05.004
work_keys_str_mv AT liuzijian clinicalproblemsandoutcomeindicatorsintheexpertconsensusdeterminedbythedelphimethodof5aminolevulinicacidphotodynamictherapyforthetreatmentoforalpotentialmalignantdiseases
AT wangxing clinicalproblemsandoutcomeindicatorsintheexpertconsensusdeterminedbythedelphimethodof5aminolevulinicacidphotodynamictherapyforthetreatmentoforalpotentialmalignantdiseases
AT hanying clinicalproblemsandoutcomeindicatorsintheexpertconsensusdeterminedbythedelphimethodof5aminolevulinicacidphotodynamictherapyforthetreatmentoforalpotentialmalignantdiseases
AT liuhongwei clinicalproblemsandoutcomeindicatorsintheexpertconsensusdeterminedbythedelphimethodof5aminolevulinicacidphotodynamictherapyforthetreatmentoforalpotentialmalignantdiseases