Stony Brook University Author Perspectives on Article Processing Charges

INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study is to gain an understanding of Stony Brook University (SBU) author perspectives on article processing charges (APCs). Publishing an article without restrictions, also known as open access publishing, can be a costly endeavor. Many publishers charge APCs ranging...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Clara Tran, Victoria Pilato
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Iowa State University Digital Press 2020-07-01
Series:Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.iastatedigitalpress.com/jlsc/article/id/12868/
_version_ 1797222092526059520
author Clara Tran
Victoria Pilato
author_facet Clara Tran
Victoria Pilato
author_sort Clara Tran
collection DOAJ
description INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study is to gain an understanding of Stony Brook University (SBU) author perspectives on article processing charges (APCs). Publishing an article without restrictions, also known as open access publishing, can be a costly endeavor. Many publishers charge APCs ranging from hundredsto thousands of dollars to publish an article without access restrictions. Authors who cannot obtain funding from grant agencies or their institution must pay APCs on their own. Do APCs fundamentally impact how authors choose their preferred publication venues? METHODS A cross-sectional survey was designed to learn SBU author perspectives on, and concerns about, APCs. RESULTS Responses mainly came from the sciences. Many SBU authors preferred to publish in a prestigious journal or journal of their choice rather than in an open access journal. Most authors published their articles in open access journals even if they were required to pay APCs. Many authors found that it was difficult finding funding for APCs and some expressed their concerns about the double charging practice. DISCUSSION SBU authors might believe that publishing in established and prestigious journals could secure their career’s advancement. Authors who chose to pay open access journals with APCs might be following publishing criteria. Libraries can encourage authors to negotiate with publishers to obtain a discount or waiver of APCs, when possible. Institutions should negotiate shifting journal subscription costs toward hybrid open access publishing. CONCLUSION Data will be used to inform how the SBU Libraries can help authors locate funding opportunities for APCs.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T13:15:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3ce38498bad14b15954eb4760a8cbac1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2162-3309
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T13:15:50Z
publishDate 2020-07-01
publisher Iowa State University Digital Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication
spelling doaj.art-3ce38498bad14b15954eb4760a8cbac12024-04-04T17:34:02ZengIowa State University Digital PressJournal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication2162-33092020-07-018110.7710/2162-3309.2349Stony Brook University Author Perspectives on Article Processing ChargesClara Tran0Victoria Pilato1 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study is to gain an understanding of Stony Brook University (SBU) author perspectives on article processing charges (APCs). Publishing an article without restrictions, also known as open access publishing, can be a costly endeavor. Many publishers charge APCs ranging from hundredsto thousands of dollars to publish an article without access restrictions. Authors who cannot obtain funding from grant agencies or their institution must pay APCs on their own. Do APCs fundamentally impact how authors choose their preferred publication venues? METHODS A cross-sectional survey was designed to learn SBU author perspectives on, and concerns about, APCs. RESULTS Responses mainly came from the sciences. Many SBU authors preferred to publish in a prestigious journal or journal of their choice rather than in an open access journal. Most authors published their articles in open access journals even if they were required to pay APCs. Many authors found that it was difficult finding funding for APCs and some expressed their concerns about the double charging practice. DISCUSSION SBU authors might believe that publishing in established and prestigious journals could secure their career’s advancement. Authors who chose to pay open access journals with APCs might be following publishing criteria. Libraries can encourage authors to negotiate with publishers to obtain a discount or waiver of APCs, when possible. Institutions should negotiate shifting journal subscription costs toward hybrid open access publishing. CONCLUSION Data will be used to inform how the SBU Libraries can help authors locate funding opportunities for APCs.https://www.iastatedigitalpress.com/jlsc/article/id/12868/article processing chargesfunding agenciesopen access journalshybrid journalsauthor-pays model
spellingShingle Clara Tran
Victoria Pilato
Stony Brook University Author Perspectives on Article Processing Charges
Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication
article processing charges
funding agencies
open access journals
hybrid journals
author-pays model
title Stony Brook University Author Perspectives on Article Processing Charges
title_full Stony Brook University Author Perspectives on Article Processing Charges
title_fullStr Stony Brook University Author Perspectives on Article Processing Charges
title_full_unstemmed Stony Brook University Author Perspectives on Article Processing Charges
title_short Stony Brook University Author Perspectives on Article Processing Charges
title_sort stony brook university author perspectives on article processing charges
topic article processing charges
funding agencies
open access journals
hybrid journals
author-pays model
url https://www.iastatedigitalpress.com/jlsc/article/id/12868/
work_keys_str_mv AT claratran stonybrookuniversityauthorperspectivesonarticleprocessingcharges
AT victoriapilato stonybrookuniversityauthorperspectivesonarticleprocessingcharges