Peer Comment

Peer Comment

Peer comment on Online Resistance to Precarious Archaeological Labour by Sam Hardy.

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Paul Mullins
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	University of York 2015-05-01
Series:	Internet Archaeology
Subjects:	archaeology peer comment peer review
Online Access:	http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue39/4/comms.cfm

Similar Items

Peer Comment
by: Whitney Battle-Baptiste
Published: (2015-05-01)

Peer Comment
by: Gareth Beale
Published: (2015-05-01)

Peer Comment
by: Andrew Bevan
Published: (2015-05-01)

Peer Comment
by: Neil Asher Silberman
Published: (2015-05-01)

Peer Comment: Films, digs and death: a review of the Project Eliseg videos
by: Ben Marwick
Published: (2015-05-01)

Peer Comment
by: WhitneyBattle-Baptiste
Published: (2015-05-01)

Peer Comment
by: Jesse W. Stephen
Published: (2015-05-01)

Integrating Computer-Mediated Peer Review in ESL/EFL Higher Education: A Systematic Review
by: Nur Arifah Drajati, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01)

THE IMPACT OF PEER FEEDBACK ON HIGHER EDUCATION STUDENTS’ ORAL PRESENTATION: A CASE STUDY
by: Suharni Suharni, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01)

Re-Thinking Peer Reviewing in the Virtual Context: The Roles of Giving and Receiving Online Feedback in L2 Spanish Classrooms
by: Emilia Illana-Mahiques
Published: (2021-09-01)

Online peer editing: effects of comments and edits on academic writing skills
by: Han Zhang, et al.
Published: (2022-07-01)

A health sciences researcher’s experience of manuscript review comments, 2020–2022
by: Gina Joubert
Published: (2023-10-01)

Effects of Undergraduate Student Reviewers’ Ability on Comments Provided, Reviewing Behavior, and Performance in an Online Video Peer Assessment Activity
by: Liang-Yi Li, et al.
Published: (2023-04-01)

Peer Feedback Tool for Lectures & Small-Group Teaching
by: Maria Blanco, et al.
Published: (2011-02-01)

Who Is (Likely) Peer-Reviewing Your Papers? A Partial Insight into the World’s Top Reviewers
by: Francesco Pomponi, et al.
Published: (2019-03-01)

Open peer review: some considerations on the selection and management of reviewers
by: Andrea Capaccioni
Published: (2022-12-01)

Peer Feedback Tool for Clinical Teaching
by: Elisa Zenni, et al.
Published: (2011-10-01)

Peer reviewers' willingness to review, their recommendations and quality of reviews after the Finnish Medical Journal switched from single-blind to double-blind peer review
by: Piitu Parmanne, et al.
Published: (2023-10-01)

Linguistic Comments on Iranian Medical Researchers' Manuscripts: Exploring the Reasons for Linguistic Errors
by: Nasrin Shokrpour, et al.
Published: (2021-09-01)

An Evaluation of the Accuracy of Peer to Peer Surgical Teaching and the Role of the Peer Review Process
by: Sheila Oh, et al.
Published: (2014-06-01)

Innovations in scholarly peer review at Nature Publishing Group and Palgrave Macmillan
by: Amy Bourke-Waite
Published: (2015-07-01)

Teaching Academic Writing in Iranian EFL Classrooms: Teacher-initiated Comments or Peer-provided Feedback?
by: Saeed Ketabi, et al.
Published: (2012-01-01)

Peer-reviewer index for Volume 33, 2020
by: Gustavo García Henao
Published: (2020-10-01)

Ad Hoc Peer Reviewers of Articles in 2008
by: Getulio Teixeira Batista
Published: (2008-12-01)

English for research publication purposes: The case of scholarly peer review comments
by: Vahid Mahmoudi-Gahrouei, et al.
Published: (2016-11-01)

Peer review: a process undergoing a required transformation
by: Mauro Guerrini, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01)

Maintaining Live Discussion in Two-Stage Open Peer Review
by: Erik eSandewall, et al.
Published: (2012-02-01)

Aggregating post-publication peer reviews and ratings
by: Răzvan Valentin Florian
Published: (2012-05-01)

Writing in the natural sciences: Understanding the effects of different types of reviewers on the writing process
by: Patchan, M. M., ., &, et al.
Published: (2011-01-01)

The effectiveness of the blog-based peer response for L2 writing
by: Pham Vu Phi Ho, et al.
Published: (2011-06-01)

Moving peer review transparency from process to praxis
by: Emily Ford
Published: (2019-10-01)

BioéthiqueOnline: Moving to Peer-Review / BioéthiqueOnline : Passage à l’évaluation par les pairs
by: Master, Zubin, et al.
Published: (2012-12-01)

The “Peer” in “Peer Review”
by: Gad Perry, et al.
Published: (2011-12-01)

Open peer review: un esperimento
by: Maria Chiara Pievatolo
Published: (2012-07-01)

Thank You to Our 2022 Peer Reviewers
by: Susan Trumbore, et al.
Published: (2023-06-01)

Thank You to Our 2022 Peer Reviewers
by: Stephen M. Griffies, et al.
Published: (2023-05-01)

OBJN 2005 Thanks to Peer Reviewers and Authors
by: Isabel C.F. da Cruz
Published: (2005-12-01)

Thank You to Our 2020 Peer Reviewers
by: Susan Trumbore, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01)

Peer Review of Manuscripts: An Online Training Module
by: Latha Chandran, et al.
Published: (2013-06-01)

Exploring the use of peer review in large university courses
by: Naemi Luckner, et al.
Published: (2015-08-01)