Predictors of Urgent Dialysis Following Ambulance Transport to the Emergency Department in Patients Treated With Maintenance Hemodialysis

Background: Patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis frequently require ambulance transport to the emergency department (ambulance-ED transport). Identifying predictors of outcomes after ambulance-ED transport, especially the need for timely dialysis, is important to health care providers. Object...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aran Thanamyooran, Megi Nallbani, Amanda J. Vinson, David A. Clark, Patrick T. Fok, Judah Goldstein, Keigan M. More, Janel Swain, Hana Wiemer, Karthik K Tennankore
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2023-01-01
Series:Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/20543581221149707
_version_ 1797948512241975296
author Aran Thanamyooran
Megi Nallbani
Amanda J. Vinson
David A. Clark
Patrick T. Fok
Judah Goldstein
Keigan M. More
Janel Swain
Hana Wiemer
Karthik K Tennankore
author_facet Aran Thanamyooran
Megi Nallbani
Amanda J. Vinson
David A. Clark
Patrick T. Fok
Judah Goldstein
Keigan M. More
Janel Swain
Hana Wiemer
Karthik K Tennankore
author_sort Aran Thanamyooran
collection DOAJ
description Background: Patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis frequently require ambulance transport to the emergency department (ambulance-ED transport). Identifying predictors of outcomes after ambulance-ED transport, especially the need for timely dialysis, is important to health care providers. Objective: The purpose of this study was to derive a risk-prediction model for urgent dialysis after ambulance-ED transport. Design: Observational cohort study Setting and Patients: All ambulance-ED transports among incident and prevalent patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis affiliated with a regional dialysis program (catchment area of approximately 750 000 individuals) from 2014 to 2018. Measurements: Patients’ vital signs (systolic blood pressure, oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, and heart rate) at the time of paramedic transport and time since last dialysis were utilized as predictors for the outcome of interest. The primary outcome was urgent dialysis (defined as dialysis in a monitored setting within 24 hours of ED arrival or dialysis within 24 hours with the first ED patient blood potassium level >6.5 mmol/L) for an unscheduled indication. Secondary outcomes included, hospitalization, hospital length of stay, and in-hospital mortality. Methods: A logistic regression model to predict outcomes of urgent dialysis. Discrimination and calibration were assessed using the C-statistic and Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Results: Among 878 ED visits, 63 (7.2%) required urgent dialysis. Hypoxemia (odds ratio [OR]: 4.04, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.75-9.33) and time from last dialysis of 24 to 48 hours (OR: 3.43, 95% CI: 1.05-11.9) and >48 hours (OR: 9.22, 95% CI: 3.37-25.23) were strongly associated with urgent dialysis. A risk-prediction model incorporating patients’ vital signs and time from last dialysis had good discrimination (C-statistic 0.8217) and calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit P value .8899). Urgent dialysis patients were more likely to be hospitalized (63% vs 34%), but there were no differences in inpatient mortality or length of stay. Limitations: Missing data, requires external validation. Conclusion: We derived a risk-prediction model for urgent dialysis that may better guide appropriate transport and care for patients requiring ambulance-ED transport.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T21:44:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3ce937b68bf246fb9cc04ce0ef29b958
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2054-3581
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T21:44:32Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease
spelling doaj.art-3ce937b68bf246fb9cc04ce0ef29b9582023-01-18T14:10:46ZengSAGE PublishingCanadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease2054-35812023-01-011010.1177/20543581221149707Predictors of Urgent Dialysis Following Ambulance Transport to the Emergency Department in Patients Treated With Maintenance HemodialysisAran Thanamyooran0Megi Nallbani1Amanda J. Vinson2David A. Clark3Patrick T. Fok4Judah Goldstein5Keigan M. More6Janel Swain7Hana Wiemer8Karthik K Tennankore9Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, CanadaEmergency Health Services, Dartmouth, NS, CanadaDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, CanadaDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, CanadaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, CanadaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, CanadaDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, CanadaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, CanadaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, CanadaDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, CanadaBackground: Patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis frequently require ambulance transport to the emergency department (ambulance-ED transport). Identifying predictors of outcomes after ambulance-ED transport, especially the need for timely dialysis, is important to health care providers. Objective: The purpose of this study was to derive a risk-prediction model for urgent dialysis after ambulance-ED transport. Design: Observational cohort study Setting and Patients: All ambulance-ED transports among incident and prevalent patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis affiliated with a regional dialysis program (catchment area of approximately 750 000 individuals) from 2014 to 2018. Measurements: Patients’ vital signs (systolic blood pressure, oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, and heart rate) at the time of paramedic transport and time since last dialysis were utilized as predictors for the outcome of interest. The primary outcome was urgent dialysis (defined as dialysis in a monitored setting within 24 hours of ED arrival or dialysis within 24 hours with the first ED patient blood potassium level >6.5 mmol/L) for an unscheduled indication. Secondary outcomes included, hospitalization, hospital length of stay, and in-hospital mortality. Methods: A logistic regression model to predict outcomes of urgent dialysis. Discrimination and calibration were assessed using the C-statistic and Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Results: Among 878 ED visits, 63 (7.2%) required urgent dialysis. Hypoxemia (odds ratio [OR]: 4.04, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.75-9.33) and time from last dialysis of 24 to 48 hours (OR: 3.43, 95% CI: 1.05-11.9) and >48 hours (OR: 9.22, 95% CI: 3.37-25.23) were strongly associated with urgent dialysis. A risk-prediction model incorporating patients’ vital signs and time from last dialysis had good discrimination (C-statistic 0.8217) and calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit P value .8899). Urgent dialysis patients were more likely to be hospitalized (63% vs 34%), but there were no differences in inpatient mortality or length of stay. Limitations: Missing data, requires external validation. Conclusion: We derived a risk-prediction model for urgent dialysis that may better guide appropriate transport and care for patients requiring ambulance-ED transport.https://doi.org/10.1177/20543581221149707
spellingShingle Aran Thanamyooran
Megi Nallbani
Amanda J. Vinson
David A. Clark
Patrick T. Fok
Judah Goldstein
Keigan M. More
Janel Swain
Hana Wiemer
Karthik K Tennankore
Predictors of Urgent Dialysis Following Ambulance Transport to the Emergency Department in Patients Treated With Maintenance Hemodialysis
Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease
title Predictors of Urgent Dialysis Following Ambulance Transport to the Emergency Department in Patients Treated With Maintenance Hemodialysis
title_full Predictors of Urgent Dialysis Following Ambulance Transport to the Emergency Department in Patients Treated With Maintenance Hemodialysis
title_fullStr Predictors of Urgent Dialysis Following Ambulance Transport to the Emergency Department in Patients Treated With Maintenance Hemodialysis
title_full_unstemmed Predictors of Urgent Dialysis Following Ambulance Transport to the Emergency Department in Patients Treated With Maintenance Hemodialysis
title_short Predictors of Urgent Dialysis Following Ambulance Transport to the Emergency Department in Patients Treated With Maintenance Hemodialysis
title_sort predictors of urgent dialysis following ambulance transport to the emergency department in patients treated with maintenance hemodialysis
url https://doi.org/10.1177/20543581221149707
work_keys_str_mv AT aranthanamyooran predictorsofurgentdialysisfollowingambulancetransporttotheemergencydepartmentinpatientstreatedwithmaintenancehemodialysis
AT meginallbani predictorsofurgentdialysisfollowingambulancetransporttotheemergencydepartmentinpatientstreatedwithmaintenancehemodialysis
AT amandajvinson predictorsofurgentdialysisfollowingambulancetransporttotheemergencydepartmentinpatientstreatedwithmaintenancehemodialysis
AT davidaclark predictorsofurgentdialysisfollowingambulancetransporttotheemergencydepartmentinpatientstreatedwithmaintenancehemodialysis
AT patricktfok predictorsofurgentdialysisfollowingambulancetransporttotheemergencydepartmentinpatientstreatedwithmaintenancehemodialysis
AT judahgoldstein predictorsofurgentdialysisfollowingambulancetransporttotheemergencydepartmentinpatientstreatedwithmaintenancehemodialysis
AT keiganmmore predictorsofurgentdialysisfollowingambulancetransporttotheemergencydepartmentinpatientstreatedwithmaintenancehemodialysis
AT janelswain predictorsofurgentdialysisfollowingambulancetransporttotheemergencydepartmentinpatientstreatedwithmaintenancehemodialysis
AT hanawiemer predictorsofurgentdialysisfollowingambulancetransporttotheemergencydepartmentinpatientstreatedwithmaintenancehemodialysis
AT karthikktennankore predictorsofurgentdialysisfollowingambulancetransporttotheemergencydepartmentinpatientstreatedwithmaintenancehemodialysis