The Romanian Ombudsman and It's Interraction with the Courts- An Exploratory Research

<p>The article focuses on the institution of the Ombudsman and its relations with other institutions/ powers of the state. The least explored interaction, at least in the Romanian literature, is the interaction between the Ombudsman and the courts (both the Constitutional Court and the ordinar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dacian DRAGOŞ, Bogdana NEAMŢU, Dan BALICA
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca 2010-10-01
Series:Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences
Online Access:https://rtsa.ro/tras/index.php/tras/article/view/180
_version_ 1797262699515609088
author Dacian DRAGOŞ
Bogdana NEAMŢU
Dan BALICA
author_facet Dacian DRAGOŞ
Bogdana NEAMŢU
Dan BALICA
author_sort Dacian DRAGOŞ
collection DOAJ
description <p>The article focuses on the institution of the Ombudsman and its relations with other institutions/ powers of the state. The least explored interaction, at least in the Romanian literature, is the interaction between the Ombudsman and the courts (both the Constitutional Court and the ordinary ones), in the context of the need for Ombudsman institutions to develop the so called ‘Ombudsnorms’ of good administration. There are no empirical studies trying to explore this interaction and how it actually works in practice. The first part of the article offers an analysis of the existing literature on the interaction between the Ombudsman institution and the courts in various legal systems. The second part of the article consists of an exploratory empirical research of the interaction between the Romanian Ombudsman and the courts. The methodology of the research is qualitative – analysis of the Ombudsman’s annual reports and structured interviews with judges and the representative of the Romanian Ombudsman institution. The main conclusion of the study is that until now the interaction is rather limited and that there seems to be no ‘desire’ on behalf of both the courts and the Ombudsman to explore the possibilities for more cooperation/interaction, the main reason given being the independence of justice.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-11T11:48:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3cf0917703d844a6a294f961bab8e795
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1842-2845
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-25T00:01:16Z
publishDate 2010-10-01
publisher Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca
record_format Article
series Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences
spelling doaj.art-3cf0917703d844a6a294f961bab8e7952024-03-14T07:28:34ZengBabes-Bolyai University, Cluj-NapocaTransylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences1842-28452010-10-016315875196The Romanian Ombudsman and It's Interraction with the Courts- An Exploratory ResearchDacian DRAGOŞ0Bogdana NEAMŢU1Dan BALICA2Associate Professor, Public Administration Department, Faculty of Political, Administrative and Communication Sciences, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, RomaniaLecturer, Public Administration Department, Faculty of Political, Administrative and Communication Sciences, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, RomaniaResearcher, Public Administration Department, Faculty of Political, Administrative and Communication Sciences, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania<p>The article focuses on the institution of the Ombudsman and its relations with other institutions/ powers of the state. The least explored interaction, at least in the Romanian literature, is the interaction between the Ombudsman and the courts (both the Constitutional Court and the ordinary ones), in the context of the need for Ombudsman institutions to develop the so called ‘Ombudsnorms’ of good administration. There are no empirical studies trying to explore this interaction and how it actually works in practice. The first part of the article offers an analysis of the existing literature on the interaction between the Ombudsman institution and the courts in various legal systems. The second part of the article consists of an exploratory empirical research of the interaction between the Romanian Ombudsman and the courts. The methodology of the research is qualitative – analysis of the Ombudsman’s annual reports and structured interviews with judges and the representative of the Romanian Ombudsman institution. The main conclusion of the study is that until now the interaction is rather limited and that there seems to be no ‘desire’ on behalf of both the courts and the Ombudsman to explore the possibilities for more cooperation/interaction, the main reason given being the independence of justice.</p>https://rtsa.ro/tras/index.php/tras/article/view/180
spellingShingle Dacian DRAGOŞ
Bogdana NEAMŢU
Dan BALICA
The Romanian Ombudsman and It's Interraction with the Courts- An Exploratory Research
Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences
title The Romanian Ombudsman and It's Interraction with the Courts- An Exploratory Research
title_full The Romanian Ombudsman and It's Interraction with the Courts- An Exploratory Research
title_fullStr The Romanian Ombudsman and It's Interraction with the Courts- An Exploratory Research
title_full_unstemmed The Romanian Ombudsman and It's Interraction with the Courts- An Exploratory Research
title_short The Romanian Ombudsman and It's Interraction with the Courts- An Exploratory Research
title_sort romanian ombudsman and it s interraction with the courts an exploratory research
url https://rtsa.ro/tras/index.php/tras/article/view/180
work_keys_str_mv AT daciandragos theromanianombudsmananditsinterractionwiththecourtsanexploratoryresearch
AT bogdananeamtu theromanianombudsmananditsinterractionwiththecourtsanexploratoryresearch
AT danbalica theromanianombudsmananditsinterractionwiththecourtsanexploratoryresearch
AT daciandragos romanianombudsmananditsinterractionwiththecourtsanexploratoryresearch
AT bogdananeamtu romanianombudsmananditsinterractionwiththecourtsanexploratoryresearch
AT danbalica romanianombudsmananditsinterractionwiththecourtsanexploratoryresearch