Systematic Analysis of Evidence and Sound Expert Assessment: Two Enablers of Evidence‐Based Decision‐Making in Health
Abstract This commentary discusses attributes, membership, and modus operandi of advisory committees in the health sector, taking examples of a few committees operating internationally. It concludes on the importance of transparency and legitimacy for the credibility of their outcomes.
Main Authors: | Marie Paule Kieny, Vasee Moorthy |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2018-09-01
|
Series: | Global Challenges |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.201800022 |
Similar Items
-
A Typology of Scientific Advisory Committees
by: Gaëlle M. N. Groux, et al.
Published: (2018-09-01) -
Towards a Systematic Understanding of How to Institutionally Design Scientific Advisory Committees: A Conceptual Framework and Introduction to a Special Journal Issue
by: Steven J. Hoffman, et al.
Published: (2018-09-01) -
Functionality of technical working groups in enabling evidence-informed decision-making within Malawi's Ministry of Health: a cross-sectional qualitative study
by: Melody Sakala, et al.
Published: (2023-06-01) -
An Overview of Systematic Reviews to Inform the Institutional Design of Scientific Advisory Committees
by: Asha Behdinan, et al.
Published: (2018-09-01) -
Community influences on education [kaset]
by: 332478 Kirst, Michael W.
Published: (1973)