Current and lasting effects of affect labeling on late positive potential (LPP) amplitudes elicited by negative events

Abstract Introduction Labeling the emotional aspect of self‐unrelated stimuli (i.e., affect labeling) is a crucial strategy for implicit emotion regulation. However, it is uncertain whether affect labeling influences event‐related potential (ERP) responses (e.g., the late positive potential, LPP) to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jiafeng Liang, Huiyan Lin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-07-01
Series:Brain and Behavior
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.3065
_version_ 1797781985810186240
author Jiafeng Liang
Huiyan Lin
author_facet Jiafeng Liang
Huiyan Lin
author_sort Jiafeng Liang
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction Labeling the emotional aspect of self‐unrelated stimuli (i.e., affect labeling) is a crucial strategy for implicit emotion regulation. However, it is uncertain whether affect labeling influences event‐related potential (ERP) responses (e.g., the late positive potential, LPP) to negative stimuli in comparison with control conditions in which attention is shifted to the emotional content of the stimuli (e.g., affect matching). Additionally, it is unknown whether affect labeling has a lasting effect on the processing of negative stimuli. Methods Participants were required to label the emotion (negative or neutral) of target pictures with two words, to match the emotion with alternative pictures or to merely view the target pictures. Target pictures were presented again immediately after the regulation task. After all the target pictures had been labeled, matched and viewed, the pictures were re‐exposed for the third time. Results The results showed that negative pictures elicited larger late LPP responses during the affect labeling task than during other tasks. However, the LPP responses were smaller for negative pictures in the affect labeling condition than in the other conditions when target pictures were re‐exposed immediately after the task. When target pictures were re‐presented again long after the regulation tasks, the LPP responses were smaller for negative stimuli with a history of affect labeling than viewing, whereas this effect did not differ between the affect labeling and matching conditions. Conclusion The current findings suggest that affect labeling has current effects and, to some extent, has lasting effects on negative stimulus processing.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T00:04:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3d04383dac004cf1a9d6f99b93772446
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2162-3279
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T00:04:40Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Brain and Behavior
spelling doaj.art-3d04383dac004cf1a9d6f99b937724462023-07-13T04:43:15ZengWileyBrain and Behavior2162-32792023-07-01137n/an/a10.1002/brb3.3065Current and lasting effects of affect labeling on late positive potential (LPP) amplitudes elicited by negative eventsJiafeng Liang0Huiyan Lin1Department of Applied Psychology, School of EducationGuangdong University of EducationGuangzhouChinaInstitute of Applied Psychology, School of Public AdministrationGuangdong University of FinanceGuangzhouChinaAbstract Introduction Labeling the emotional aspect of self‐unrelated stimuli (i.e., affect labeling) is a crucial strategy for implicit emotion regulation. However, it is uncertain whether affect labeling influences event‐related potential (ERP) responses (e.g., the late positive potential, LPP) to negative stimuli in comparison with control conditions in which attention is shifted to the emotional content of the stimuli (e.g., affect matching). Additionally, it is unknown whether affect labeling has a lasting effect on the processing of negative stimuli. Methods Participants were required to label the emotion (negative or neutral) of target pictures with two words, to match the emotion with alternative pictures or to merely view the target pictures. Target pictures were presented again immediately after the regulation task. After all the target pictures had been labeled, matched and viewed, the pictures were re‐exposed for the third time. Results The results showed that negative pictures elicited larger late LPP responses during the affect labeling task than during other tasks. However, the LPP responses were smaller for negative pictures in the affect labeling condition than in the other conditions when target pictures were re‐exposed immediately after the task. When target pictures were re‐presented again long after the regulation tasks, the LPP responses were smaller for negative stimuli with a history of affect labeling than viewing, whereas this effect did not differ between the affect labeling and matching conditions. Conclusion The current findings suggest that affect labeling has current effects and, to some extent, has lasting effects on negative stimulus processing.https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.3065affect labelingcurrent effectslasting effectsLPPnegative pictures
spellingShingle Jiafeng Liang
Huiyan Lin
Current and lasting effects of affect labeling on late positive potential (LPP) amplitudes elicited by negative events
Brain and Behavior
affect labeling
current effects
lasting effects
LPP
negative pictures
title Current and lasting effects of affect labeling on late positive potential (LPP) amplitudes elicited by negative events
title_full Current and lasting effects of affect labeling on late positive potential (LPP) amplitudes elicited by negative events
title_fullStr Current and lasting effects of affect labeling on late positive potential (LPP) amplitudes elicited by negative events
title_full_unstemmed Current and lasting effects of affect labeling on late positive potential (LPP) amplitudes elicited by negative events
title_short Current and lasting effects of affect labeling on late positive potential (LPP) amplitudes elicited by negative events
title_sort current and lasting effects of affect labeling on late positive potential lpp amplitudes elicited by negative events
topic affect labeling
current effects
lasting effects
LPP
negative pictures
url https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.3065
work_keys_str_mv AT jiafengliang currentandlastingeffectsofaffectlabelingonlatepositivepotentiallppamplitudeselicitedbynegativeevents
AT huiyanlin currentandlastingeffectsofaffectlabelingonlatepositivepotentiallppamplitudeselicitedbynegativeevents