Hippocampal development and the dissociation of cognitive-spatial mapping from motor performance [version 1; referees: 2 approved]
The publication of a recent article in F1000Research has led to discussion of, and correspondence on a broader issue that has a long history in the fields of neuroscience and psychology. Namely, is it possible to separate the cognitive components of performance, in this case spatial behavior, from...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
F1000 Research Ltd
2015-08-01
|
| Series: | F1000Research |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://f1000research.com/articles/4-625/v1 |
| _version_ | 1819227016971419648 |
|---|---|
| author | Bryan D. Devan Christopher Magalis Robert J. McDonald |
| author_facet | Bryan D. Devan Christopher Magalis Robert J. McDonald |
| author_sort | Bryan D. Devan |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The publication of a recent article in F1000Research has led to discussion of, and correspondence on a broader issue that has a long history in the fields of neuroscience and psychology. Namely, is it possible to separate the cognitive components of performance, in this case spatial behavior, from the motoric demands of a task? Early psychological experiments attempted such a dissociation by studying a form of spatial maze learning where initially rats were allowed to explore a complex maze, termed “latent learning,” before reinforcement was introduced. Those rats afforded the latent learning experience solved the task faster than those that were not, implying that cognitive map learning during exploration aided in the performance of the task once a motivational component was introduced. This form of latent learning was interpreted as successfully demonstrating that an exploratory cognitive map component was acquired irrespective of performing a learned spatial response under deprivation/motivational conditions. The neural substrate for cognitive learning was hypothesized to depend on place cells within the hippocampus. Subsequent behavioral studies attempted to directly eliminate the motor component of spatial learning by allowing rats to passively view the distal environment before performing any motor response using a task that is widely considered to be hippocampal-dependent. Latent learning in the water maze, using a passive placement procedure has met with mixed results. One constraint on viewing cues before performing a learned swimming response to a hidden goal has been the act of dynamically viewing distal cues while moving through a part of the environment where an optimal learned spatial escape response would be observed. We briefly review these past findings obtained with adult animals to the recent efforts of establishing a “behavioral topology” separating cognitive-spatial learning from tasks differing in motoric demands in an attempt to define when cognitive-spatial behavior emerges during development. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-23T10:34:41Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-3d0d70ace94349d79dda63759d73c529 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2046-1402 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-23T10:34:41Z |
| publishDate | 2015-08-01 |
| publisher | F1000 Research Ltd |
| record_format | Article |
| series | F1000Research |
| spelling | doaj.art-3d0d70ace94349d79dda63759d73c5292022-12-21T17:50:20ZengF1000 Research LtdF1000Research2046-14022015-08-01410.12688/f1000research.6966.17502Hippocampal development and the dissociation of cognitive-spatial mapping from motor performance [version 1; referees: 2 approved]Bryan D. Devan0Christopher Magalis1Robert J. McDonald2Psychology Department, Towson University, Towson, Maryland, 21252, USAPsychology Department, Towson University, Towson, Maryland, 21252, USADepartment of Neuroscience, Canadian Center for Behavioural Neuroscience, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, TIK 3M4, CanadaThe publication of a recent article in F1000Research has led to discussion of, and correspondence on a broader issue that has a long history in the fields of neuroscience and psychology. Namely, is it possible to separate the cognitive components of performance, in this case spatial behavior, from the motoric demands of a task? Early psychological experiments attempted such a dissociation by studying a form of spatial maze learning where initially rats were allowed to explore a complex maze, termed “latent learning,” before reinforcement was introduced. Those rats afforded the latent learning experience solved the task faster than those that were not, implying that cognitive map learning during exploration aided in the performance of the task once a motivational component was introduced. This form of latent learning was interpreted as successfully demonstrating that an exploratory cognitive map component was acquired irrespective of performing a learned spatial response under deprivation/motivational conditions. The neural substrate for cognitive learning was hypothesized to depend on place cells within the hippocampus. Subsequent behavioral studies attempted to directly eliminate the motor component of spatial learning by allowing rats to passively view the distal environment before performing any motor response using a task that is widely considered to be hippocampal-dependent. Latent learning in the water maze, using a passive placement procedure has met with mixed results. One constraint on viewing cues before performing a learned swimming response to a hidden goal has been the act of dynamically viewing distal cues while moving through a part of the environment where an optimal learned spatial escape response would be observed. We briefly review these past findings obtained with adult animals to the recent efforts of establishing a “behavioral topology” separating cognitive-spatial learning from tasks differing in motoric demands in an attempt to define when cognitive-spatial behavior emerges during development.http://f1000research.com/articles/4-625/v1Cognitive NeuroscienceMotor SystemsNeurodevelopment |
| spellingShingle | Bryan D. Devan Christopher Magalis Robert J. McDonald Hippocampal development and the dissociation of cognitive-spatial mapping from motor performance [version 1; referees: 2 approved] F1000Research Cognitive Neuroscience Motor Systems Neurodevelopment |
| title | Hippocampal development and the dissociation of cognitive-spatial mapping from motor performance [version 1; referees: 2 approved] |
| title_full | Hippocampal development and the dissociation of cognitive-spatial mapping from motor performance [version 1; referees: 2 approved] |
| title_fullStr | Hippocampal development and the dissociation of cognitive-spatial mapping from motor performance [version 1; referees: 2 approved] |
| title_full_unstemmed | Hippocampal development and the dissociation of cognitive-spatial mapping from motor performance [version 1; referees: 2 approved] |
| title_short | Hippocampal development and the dissociation of cognitive-spatial mapping from motor performance [version 1; referees: 2 approved] |
| title_sort | hippocampal development and the dissociation of cognitive spatial mapping from motor performance version 1 referees 2 approved |
| topic | Cognitive Neuroscience Motor Systems Neurodevelopment |
| url | http://f1000research.com/articles/4-625/v1 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT bryanddevan hippocampaldevelopmentandthedissociationofcognitivespatialmappingfrommotorperformanceversion1referees2approved AT christophermagalis hippocampaldevelopmentandthedissociationofcognitivespatialmappingfrommotorperformanceversion1referees2approved AT robertjmcdonald hippocampaldevelopmentandthedissociationofcognitivespatialmappingfrommotorperformanceversion1referees2approved |