How conserved are the conserved 16S-rRNA regions?

The 16S rRNA gene has been used as master key for studying prokaryotic diversity in almost every environment. Despite the claim of several researchers to have the best universal primers, the reality is that no primer has been demonstrated to be truly universal. This suggests that conserved regions o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marcel Martinez-Porchas, Enrique Villalpando-Canchola, Luis Enrique Ortiz Suarez, Francisco Vargas-Albores
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PeerJ Inc. 2017-02-01
Series:PeerJ
Subjects:
Online Access:https://peerj.com/articles/3036.pdf
_version_ 1797425532597436416
author Marcel Martinez-Porchas
Enrique Villalpando-Canchola
Luis Enrique Ortiz Suarez
Francisco Vargas-Albores
author_facet Marcel Martinez-Porchas
Enrique Villalpando-Canchola
Luis Enrique Ortiz Suarez
Francisco Vargas-Albores
author_sort Marcel Martinez-Porchas
collection DOAJ
description The 16S rRNA gene has been used as master key for studying prokaryotic diversity in almost every environment. Despite the claim of several researchers to have the best universal primers, the reality is that no primer has been demonstrated to be truly universal. This suggests that conserved regions of the gene may not be as conserved as expected. The aim of this study was to evaluate the conservation degree of the so-called conserved regions flanking the hypervariable regions of the 16S rRNA gene. Data contained in SILVA database (release 123) were used for the study. Primers reported as matches of each conserved region were assembled to form contigs; sequences sizing 12 nucleotides (12-mers) were extracted from these contigs and searched into the entire set of SILVA sequences. Frequency analysis shown that extreme regions, 1 and 10, registered the lowest frequencies. 12-mer frequencies revealed segments of contigs that were not as conserved as expected (≤90%). Fragments corresponding to the primer contigs 3, 4, 5b and 6a were recovered from all sequences in SILVA database. Nucleotide frequency analysis in each consensus demonstrated that only a small fraction of these so-called conserved regions is truly conserved in non-redundant sequences. It could be concluded that conserved regions of the 16S rRNA gene exhibit considerable variation that has to be considered when using this gene as biomarker.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T08:16:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3d32a9da5594497b997a55b38c89f3c5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2167-8359
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T08:16:31Z
publishDate 2017-02-01
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format Article
series PeerJ
spelling doaj.art-3d32a9da5594497b997a55b38c89f3c52023-12-02T22:01:10ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592017-02-015e303610.7717/peerj.3036How conserved are the conserved 16S-rRNA regions?Marcel Martinez-Porchas0Enrique Villalpando-Canchola1Luis Enrique Ortiz Suarez2Francisco Vargas-Albores3Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo, A.C., Hermosillo, Sonora, MexicoCentro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo, A.C., Hermosillo, Sonora, MexicoInstituto Tecnológico de Morelia, Morelia, Michoacán, MexicoCentro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo, A.C., Hermosillo, Sonora, MexicoThe 16S rRNA gene has been used as master key for studying prokaryotic diversity in almost every environment. Despite the claim of several researchers to have the best universal primers, the reality is that no primer has been demonstrated to be truly universal. This suggests that conserved regions of the gene may not be as conserved as expected. The aim of this study was to evaluate the conservation degree of the so-called conserved regions flanking the hypervariable regions of the 16S rRNA gene. Data contained in SILVA database (release 123) were used for the study. Primers reported as matches of each conserved region were assembled to form contigs; sequences sizing 12 nucleotides (12-mers) were extracted from these contigs and searched into the entire set of SILVA sequences. Frequency analysis shown that extreme regions, 1 and 10, registered the lowest frequencies. 12-mer frequencies revealed segments of contigs that were not as conserved as expected (≤90%). Fragments corresponding to the primer contigs 3, 4, 5b and 6a were recovered from all sequences in SILVA database. Nucleotide frequency analysis in each consensus demonstrated that only a small fraction of these so-called conserved regions is truly conserved in non-redundant sequences. It could be concluded that conserved regions of the 16S rRNA gene exhibit considerable variation that has to be considered when using this gene as biomarker.https://peerj.com/articles/3036.pdfKmersBiodiversityConserved regions 16SPrimer design
spellingShingle Marcel Martinez-Porchas
Enrique Villalpando-Canchola
Luis Enrique Ortiz Suarez
Francisco Vargas-Albores
How conserved are the conserved 16S-rRNA regions?
PeerJ
Kmers
Biodiversity
Conserved regions 16S
Primer design
title How conserved are the conserved 16S-rRNA regions?
title_full How conserved are the conserved 16S-rRNA regions?
title_fullStr How conserved are the conserved 16S-rRNA regions?
title_full_unstemmed How conserved are the conserved 16S-rRNA regions?
title_short How conserved are the conserved 16S-rRNA regions?
title_sort how conserved are the conserved 16s rrna regions
topic Kmers
Biodiversity
Conserved regions 16S
Primer design
url https://peerj.com/articles/3036.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT marcelmartinezporchas howconservedaretheconserved16srrnaregions
AT enriquevillalpandocanchola howconservedaretheconserved16srrnaregions
AT luisenriqueortizsuarez howconservedaretheconserved16srrnaregions
AT franciscovargasalbores howconservedaretheconserved16srrnaregions