Greater than 99% consensus on human caused climate change in the peer-reviewed scientific literature
While controls over the Earth’s climate system have undergone rigorous hypothesis-testing since the 1800s, questions over the scientific consensus of the role of human activities in modern climate change continue to arise in public settings. We update previous efforts to quantify the scientific cons...
Main Authors: | Mark Lynas, Benjamin Z Houlton, Simon Perry |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
IOP Publishing
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Environmental Research Letters |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac2966 |
Similar Items
-
Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming
by: John Cook, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01) -
Comment on ‘Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature’
by: Benjamin John Floyd Dean
Published: (2015-01-01) -
Consensus revisited: quantifying scientific agreement on climate change and climate expertise among Earth scientists 10 years later
by: Krista F Myers, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01) -
Reply to Comment on ‘Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature’
by: John Cook, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01) -
Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature
by: John Cook, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01)