Comparison of effect of auriculotherapy and mefenamic acid on the severity and systemic symptoms of primary dysmenorrhea: a randomized clinical trial

Abstract Background Primary dysmenorrhea (PD) is the most common complaint in young women and adolescents. Side effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs can limit their use. Therefore, non-pharmacological pain relief methods such as auriculotherapy may play an important role in PD management...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Masoomeh Vahedi, Seyedeh Batool Hasanpoor-Azghady, Leila Amiri-Farahani, Imaneh Khaki
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-09-01
Series:Trials
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05622-w
_version_ 1818731192271241216
author Masoomeh Vahedi
Seyedeh Batool Hasanpoor-Azghady
Leila Amiri-Farahani
Imaneh Khaki
author_facet Masoomeh Vahedi
Seyedeh Batool Hasanpoor-Azghady
Leila Amiri-Farahani
Imaneh Khaki
author_sort Masoomeh Vahedi
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Primary dysmenorrhea (PD) is the most common complaint in young women and adolescents. Side effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs can limit their use. Therefore, non-pharmacological pain relief methods such as auriculotherapy may play an important role in PD management. This study was conducted to compare the effect of auriculotherapy and mefenamic acid on the severity and systemic symptoms of PD. Methods In a randomized clinical trial, 83 students were randomized into two groups. In the auriculotherapy group, electrical stimulation of the ear was conducted once a week for two menstrual cycles. In each cycle close to menstruation, ear seeds were inserted on pressure points to be pressed in times of pain. In the mefenamic acid group, subjects took mefenamic acid capsules upon seeing the initial symptoms of menstruation until the pain reduces. The primary outcomes were mean pain intensity and systemic symptoms associated with it. Pain intensity was measured through the visual analog scale (VAS) and the verbal multidimensional scoring system (VMS). Systemic symptoms were assessed using VMS, as well as the yes/no question form. Results Mean pain intensity with the VAS was significantly lower in the auriculotherapy group than the mefenamic acid group in the first and second cycles of intervention. There was a significant difference in VMS grade between both groups during the second cycle of intervention. In terms of the systemic symptoms in the second cycle of intervention, no subjects had dysmenorrhea grade 3 (common systemic symptoms) in the auriculotherapy group. Whereas in the mefenamic acid group, 16.7% of the subjects still had dysmenorrhea grade 3. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the frequency of systemic symptoms of PD. There was a significant decrease in the frequency of fatigue and diarrhea in both groups. However, there was a significant reduction in the frequency of nausea, headache, and anger in the auriculotherapy group. Conclusion Mean pain intensity with the VAS was lower with the auriculotherapy. Also, 65.9% of auriculotherapy group subjects were in the dysmenorrhea grades 0 and 1. Therefore, auriculotherapy is recommended because of its fewer complications and more effect on PD. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov IRCT20181207041873N1. Registered on February 24, 2019. https://en.irct.ir/user/trial/35967/view
first_indexed 2024-12-17T23:13:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3d65c64f2f7d4948ba2ddad74d13201a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1745-6215
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T23:13:46Z
publishDate 2021-09-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Trials
spelling doaj.art-3d65c64f2f7d4948ba2ddad74d13201a2022-12-21T21:29:04ZengBMCTrials1745-62152021-09-0122111310.1186/s13063-021-05622-wComparison of effect of auriculotherapy and mefenamic acid on the severity and systemic symptoms of primary dysmenorrhea: a randomized clinical trialMasoomeh Vahedi0Seyedeh Batool Hasanpoor-Azghady1Leila Amiri-Farahani2Imaneh Khaki3Department of Midwifery and Reproductive, Nursing Care Research Center (NCRC), School of Nursing and Midwifery, Iran University of Medical SciencesDepartment of Midwifery and Reproductive, Nursing Care Research Center (NCRC), School of Nursing and Midwifery, Iran University of Medical SciencesDepartment of Midwifery and Reproductive, Nursing Care Research Center (NCRC), School of Nursing and Midwifery, Iran University of Medical SciencesDepartment of Midwifery and Reproductive, Nursing Care Research Center (NCRC), School of Nursing and Midwifery, Iran University of Medical SciencesAbstract Background Primary dysmenorrhea (PD) is the most common complaint in young women and adolescents. Side effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs can limit their use. Therefore, non-pharmacological pain relief methods such as auriculotherapy may play an important role in PD management. This study was conducted to compare the effect of auriculotherapy and mefenamic acid on the severity and systemic symptoms of PD. Methods In a randomized clinical trial, 83 students were randomized into two groups. In the auriculotherapy group, electrical stimulation of the ear was conducted once a week for two menstrual cycles. In each cycle close to menstruation, ear seeds were inserted on pressure points to be pressed in times of pain. In the mefenamic acid group, subjects took mefenamic acid capsules upon seeing the initial symptoms of menstruation until the pain reduces. The primary outcomes were mean pain intensity and systemic symptoms associated with it. Pain intensity was measured through the visual analog scale (VAS) and the verbal multidimensional scoring system (VMS). Systemic symptoms were assessed using VMS, as well as the yes/no question form. Results Mean pain intensity with the VAS was significantly lower in the auriculotherapy group than the mefenamic acid group in the first and second cycles of intervention. There was a significant difference in VMS grade between both groups during the second cycle of intervention. In terms of the systemic symptoms in the second cycle of intervention, no subjects had dysmenorrhea grade 3 (common systemic symptoms) in the auriculotherapy group. Whereas in the mefenamic acid group, 16.7% of the subjects still had dysmenorrhea grade 3. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the frequency of systemic symptoms of PD. There was a significant decrease in the frequency of fatigue and diarrhea in both groups. However, there was a significant reduction in the frequency of nausea, headache, and anger in the auriculotherapy group. Conclusion Mean pain intensity with the VAS was lower with the auriculotherapy. Also, 65.9% of auriculotherapy group subjects were in the dysmenorrhea grades 0 and 1. Therefore, auriculotherapy is recommended because of its fewer complications and more effect on PD. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov IRCT20181207041873N1. Registered on February 24, 2019. https://en.irct.ir/user/trial/35967/viewhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05622-wPrimary dysmenorrheaAuriculotherapyMefenamic acidSystemic symptoms
spellingShingle Masoomeh Vahedi
Seyedeh Batool Hasanpoor-Azghady
Leila Amiri-Farahani
Imaneh Khaki
Comparison of effect of auriculotherapy and mefenamic acid on the severity and systemic symptoms of primary dysmenorrhea: a randomized clinical trial
Trials
Primary dysmenorrhea
Auriculotherapy
Mefenamic acid
Systemic symptoms
title Comparison of effect of auriculotherapy and mefenamic acid on the severity and systemic symptoms of primary dysmenorrhea: a randomized clinical trial
title_full Comparison of effect of auriculotherapy and mefenamic acid on the severity and systemic symptoms of primary dysmenorrhea: a randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Comparison of effect of auriculotherapy and mefenamic acid on the severity and systemic symptoms of primary dysmenorrhea: a randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of effect of auriculotherapy and mefenamic acid on the severity and systemic symptoms of primary dysmenorrhea: a randomized clinical trial
title_short Comparison of effect of auriculotherapy and mefenamic acid on the severity and systemic symptoms of primary dysmenorrhea: a randomized clinical trial
title_sort comparison of effect of auriculotherapy and mefenamic acid on the severity and systemic symptoms of primary dysmenorrhea a randomized clinical trial
topic Primary dysmenorrhea
Auriculotherapy
Mefenamic acid
Systemic symptoms
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05622-w
work_keys_str_mv AT masoomehvahedi comparisonofeffectofauriculotherapyandmefenamicacidontheseverityandsystemicsymptomsofprimarydysmenorrheaarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT seyedehbatoolhasanpoorazghady comparisonofeffectofauriculotherapyandmefenamicacidontheseverityandsystemicsymptomsofprimarydysmenorrheaarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT leilaamirifarahani comparisonofeffectofauriculotherapyandmefenamicacidontheseverityandsystemicsymptomsofprimarydysmenorrheaarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT imanehkhaki comparisonofeffectofauriculotherapyandmefenamicacidontheseverityandsystemicsymptomsofprimarydysmenorrheaarandomizedclinicaltrial