Comparison of the E-Test and FAST Plaque Rifampicin Susceptibility of Tubercle Bacilli in Multidrug Resistant Strains

The conventional diagnostic tests for tuberculosis are usually unyielding and time-consuming. This is why the necessity to find new methods for early diagnosis with a high sensitivity and specificity emerges. Since many of these new technologies require expensive equipment and specialist training, i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: F. Nur ERİŞ, Can BİÇMEN
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Bilimsel Tip Yayinevi 2004-03-01
Series:Flora Infeksiyon Hastalıkları ve Klinik Mikrobiyoloji Dergisi
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.floradergisi.org/getFileContent.aspx?op=REDPDF&file_name=2004-9-1-037-042.pdf
_version_ 1797906802424152064
author F. Nur ERİŞ
Can BİÇMEN
author_facet F. Nur ERİŞ
Can BİÇMEN
author_sort F. Nur ERİŞ
collection DOAJ
description The conventional diagnostic tests for tuberculosis are usually unyielding and time-consuming. This is why the necessity to find new methods for early diagnosis with a high sensitivity and specificity emerges. Since many of these new technologies require expensive equipment and specialist training, it is unlikely that they will become widely established as routine techniques. The aim of this study is to investigate new technologies such as E-test and FAST Plaque TB-RIF in multidrug resistant cases which are promising to overcome these shortcomings. Twenty four Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains isolated from sputum of multi-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis patients and 12 sensitive strains, were studied by both agar proportion as standard method and new rapid (E-test for M. tuberculosis and FAST Plaque TB-RIF) methods to be compared in many aspects. In general, there were no significant differences between E-test and agar proportion method among multidrug resistant (MDR) cases in our study. Between agar proportion and E-test method, the sensitivity and specificity of E-test method for INH were 95.4% and 91.7% whereas for RIF 95.8% and 100% respectively. Rifampicin sensitivity in FAST Plaque method was found 88.2%. It is concluded that both methods may be suitable and supportive for resistant mycobacterial strains in routine practice due to their fast and easy applications.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T10:26:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3d6a856151a74fc794f0db6a47042afd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1300-932X
1300-932X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T10:26:26Z
publishDate 2004-03-01
publisher Bilimsel Tip Yayinevi
record_format Article
series Flora Infeksiyon Hastalıkları ve Klinik Mikrobiyoloji Dergisi
spelling doaj.art-3d6a856151a74fc794f0db6a47042afd2023-02-15T16:21:20ZengBilimsel Tip YayineviFlora Infeksiyon Hastalıkları ve Klinik Mikrobiyoloji Dergisi1300-932X1300-932X2004-03-01913742Comparison of the E-Test and FAST Plaque Rifampicin Susceptibility of Tubercle Bacilli in Multidrug Resistant StrainsF. Nur ERİŞ0Can BİÇMEN1İzmir Bölge Hıfzıssıhha Enstitüsüİzmir Göğüs Hastalıkları ve Cerrahisi Hastanesi, İZMİRThe conventional diagnostic tests for tuberculosis are usually unyielding and time-consuming. This is why the necessity to find new methods for early diagnosis with a high sensitivity and specificity emerges. Since many of these new technologies require expensive equipment and specialist training, it is unlikely that they will become widely established as routine techniques. The aim of this study is to investigate new technologies such as E-test and FAST Plaque TB-RIF in multidrug resistant cases which are promising to overcome these shortcomings. Twenty four Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains isolated from sputum of multi-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis patients and 12 sensitive strains, were studied by both agar proportion as standard method and new rapid (E-test for M. tuberculosis and FAST Plaque TB-RIF) methods to be compared in many aspects. In general, there were no significant differences between E-test and agar proportion method among multidrug resistant (MDR) cases in our study. Between agar proportion and E-test method, the sensitivity and specificity of E-test method for INH were 95.4% and 91.7% whereas for RIF 95.8% and 100% respectively. Rifampicin sensitivity in FAST Plaque method was found 88.2%. It is concluded that both methods may be suitable and supportive for resistant mycobacterial strains in routine practice due to their fast and easy applications.http://www.floradergisi.org/getFileContent.aspx?op=REDPDF&file_name=2004-9-1-037-042.pdfTuberculosisMultidrug-resistantSensitivity tests
spellingShingle F. Nur ERİŞ
Can BİÇMEN
Comparison of the E-Test and FAST Plaque Rifampicin Susceptibility of Tubercle Bacilli in Multidrug Resistant Strains
Flora Infeksiyon Hastalıkları ve Klinik Mikrobiyoloji Dergisi
Tuberculosis
Multidrug-resistant
Sensitivity tests
title Comparison of the E-Test and FAST Plaque Rifampicin Susceptibility of Tubercle Bacilli in Multidrug Resistant Strains
title_full Comparison of the E-Test and FAST Plaque Rifampicin Susceptibility of Tubercle Bacilli in Multidrug Resistant Strains
title_fullStr Comparison of the E-Test and FAST Plaque Rifampicin Susceptibility of Tubercle Bacilli in Multidrug Resistant Strains
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the E-Test and FAST Plaque Rifampicin Susceptibility of Tubercle Bacilli in Multidrug Resistant Strains
title_short Comparison of the E-Test and FAST Plaque Rifampicin Susceptibility of Tubercle Bacilli in Multidrug Resistant Strains
title_sort comparison of the e test and fast plaque rifampicin susceptibility of tubercle bacilli in multidrug resistant strains
topic Tuberculosis
Multidrug-resistant
Sensitivity tests
url http://www.floradergisi.org/getFileContent.aspx?op=REDPDF&file_name=2004-9-1-037-042.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT fnureris comparisonoftheetestandfastplaquerifampicinsusceptibilityoftuberclebacilliinmultidrugresistantstrains
AT canbicmen comparisonoftheetestandfastplaquerifampicinsusceptibilityoftuberclebacilliinmultidrugresistantstrains