Stability and flexibility in cognitive control: Interindividual dynamics and task context processing.
Adaptive behaviour requires cognitive control for shielding current goals from distractors (stability) but at the same time for switching between alternative goals (flexibility). In this behavioural study, we examine the stability-flexibility balance in left- and right-handers during two types of de...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2019-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219397 |
| _version_ | 1819019905028063232 |
|---|---|
| author | Deborah J Serrien Louise O'Regan |
| author_facet | Deborah J Serrien Louise O'Regan |
| author_sort | Deborah J Serrien |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Adaptive behaviour requires cognitive control for shielding current goals from distractors (stability) but at the same time for switching between alternative goals (flexibility). In this behavioural study, we examine the stability-flexibility balance in left- and right-handers during two types of decision-making, instructed (sensory cued) and voluntary (own choice), by means of distractor inhibition and hand/task switching. The data revealed that both groups showed opposite tendencies for instructed decision-making. Moreover, right-handers resisted distracting information more efficiently whereas left-handers showed superior switching abilities. When participants were involved in voluntary decision-making, no effects of handedness were noted, which suggests that free-choice processing alters the balance between stability and flexibility. These data illustrate that handedness is an index of individual variation during instructed decision-making, biasing the proficiency of cognitive control towards stability and flexibility of information processing. These biases can however be overruled by top-down strategies that dominate during voluntary decision-making. Overall, the research underlines the antagonistic functions of stability and flexibility in decision-making, and offers an approach for examining cognitive control and the role of internal and external factors in balancing the stability-flexibility trade-off. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-21T03:42:44Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-3d7c879058ee44efa42bf7c90242a1c3 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-21T03:42:44Z |
| publishDate | 2019-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-3d7c879058ee44efa42bf7c90242a1c32022-12-21T19:17:10ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-01147e021939710.1371/journal.pone.0219397Stability and flexibility in cognitive control: Interindividual dynamics and task context processing.Deborah J SerrienLouise O'ReganAdaptive behaviour requires cognitive control for shielding current goals from distractors (stability) but at the same time for switching between alternative goals (flexibility). In this behavioural study, we examine the stability-flexibility balance in left- and right-handers during two types of decision-making, instructed (sensory cued) and voluntary (own choice), by means of distractor inhibition and hand/task switching. The data revealed that both groups showed opposite tendencies for instructed decision-making. Moreover, right-handers resisted distracting information more efficiently whereas left-handers showed superior switching abilities. When participants were involved in voluntary decision-making, no effects of handedness were noted, which suggests that free-choice processing alters the balance between stability and flexibility. These data illustrate that handedness is an index of individual variation during instructed decision-making, biasing the proficiency of cognitive control towards stability and flexibility of information processing. These biases can however be overruled by top-down strategies that dominate during voluntary decision-making. Overall, the research underlines the antagonistic functions of stability and flexibility in decision-making, and offers an approach for examining cognitive control and the role of internal and external factors in balancing the stability-flexibility trade-off.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219397 |
| spellingShingle | Deborah J Serrien Louise O'Regan Stability and flexibility in cognitive control: Interindividual dynamics and task context processing. PLoS ONE |
| title | Stability and flexibility in cognitive control: Interindividual dynamics and task context processing. |
| title_full | Stability and flexibility in cognitive control: Interindividual dynamics and task context processing. |
| title_fullStr | Stability and flexibility in cognitive control: Interindividual dynamics and task context processing. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Stability and flexibility in cognitive control: Interindividual dynamics and task context processing. |
| title_short | Stability and flexibility in cognitive control: Interindividual dynamics and task context processing. |
| title_sort | stability and flexibility in cognitive control interindividual dynamics and task context processing |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219397 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT deborahjserrien stabilityandflexibilityincognitivecontrolinterindividualdynamicsandtaskcontextprocessing AT louiseoregan stabilityandflexibilityincognitivecontrolinterindividualdynamicsandtaskcontextprocessing |