Extinction debt in source-sink metacommunities.

In an increasingly modified world, understanding and predicting the consequences of landscape alteration on biodiversity is a challenge for ecologists. To this end, metacommunity theory has developed to better understand the complexity of local and regional interactions that occur across larger land...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nicolas Mouquet, Birte Matthiessen, Tom Miller, Andrew Gonzalez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2011-03-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/21408133/pdf/?tool=EBI
_version_ 1818400406152151040
author Nicolas Mouquet
Birte Matthiessen
Tom Miller
Andrew Gonzalez
author_facet Nicolas Mouquet
Birte Matthiessen
Tom Miller
Andrew Gonzalez
author_sort Nicolas Mouquet
collection DOAJ
description In an increasingly modified world, understanding and predicting the consequences of landscape alteration on biodiversity is a challenge for ecologists. To this end, metacommunity theory has developed to better understand the complexity of local and regional interactions that occur across larger landscapes. While metacommunity ecology has now provided several alternative models of species coexistence at different spatial scales, predictions regarding the consequences of landscape alteration have been done exclusively for the competition-colonization trade off model (CC). In this paper we investigate the effects of landscape perturbation on source-sink metacommunities. We show that habitat destruction perturbs the equilibria among species competitive effects within the metacommunity, driving both direct extinctions and an indirect extinction debt. As in CC models, we found a time lag for extinction following habitat destruction that varied in length depending upon the relative importance of direct and indirect effects. However, in contrast to CC models, we found that the less competitive species are more affected by habitat destruction. The best competitors can sometimes even be positively affected by habitat destruction, which corresponds well with the results of field studies. Our results are complementary to those results found in CC models of metacommunity dynamics. From a conservation perspective, our results illustrate that landscape alteration jeopardizes species coexistence in patchy landscapes through complex indirect effects and delayed extinctions patterns.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T07:36:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3d85fd73c97846f6b4eebcc4b90b39a3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T07:36:04Z
publishDate 2011-03-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-3d85fd73c97846f6b4eebcc4b90b39a32022-12-21T23:11:12ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032011-03-0163e1756710.1371/journal.pone.0017567Extinction debt in source-sink metacommunities.Nicolas MouquetBirte MatthiessenTom MillerAndrew GonzalezIn an increasingly modified world, understanding and predicting the consequences of landscape alteration on biodiversity is a challenge for ecologists. To this end, metacommunity theory has developed to better understand the complexity of local and regional interactions that occur across larger landscapes. While metacommunity ecology has now provided several alternative models of species coexistence at different spatial scales, predictions regarding the consequences of landscape alteration have been done exclusively for the competition-colonization trade off model (CC). In this paper we investigate the effects of landscape perturbation on source-sink metacommunities. We show that habitat destruction perturbs the equilibria among species competitive effects within the metacommunity, driving both direct extinctions and an indirect extinction debt. As in CC models, we found a time lag for extinction following habitat destruction that varied in length depending upon the relative importance of direct and indirect effects. However, in contrast to CC models, we found that the less competitive species are more affected by habitat destruction. The best competitors can sometimes even be positively affected by habitat destruction, which corresponds well with the results of field studies. Our results are complementary to those results found in CC models of metacommunity dynamics. From a conservation perspective, our results illustrate that landscape alteration jeopardizes species coexistence in patchy landscapes through complex indirect effects and delayed extinctions patterns.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/21408133/pdf/?tool=EBI
spellingShingle Nicolas Mouquet
Birte Matthiessen
Tom Miller
Andrew Gonzalez
Extinction debt in source-sink metacommunities.
PLoS ONE
title Extinction debt in source-sink metacommunities.
title_full Extinction debt in source-sink metacommunities.
title_fullStr Extinction debt in source-sink metacommunities.
title_full_unstemmed Extinction debt in source-sink metacommunities.
title_short Extinction debt in source-sink metacommunities.
title_sort extinction debt in source sink metacommunities
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/21408133/pdf/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT nicolasmouquet extinctiondebtinsourcesinkmetacommunities
AT birtematthiessen extinctiondebtinsourcesinkmetacommunities
AT tommiller extinctiondebtinsourcesinkmetacommunities
AT andrewgonzalez extinctiondebtinsourcesinkmetacommunities