Two Constructivist Aspects of Category Theory

Category theory has two unexpected links to constructivism: First, why is topos logic so close to intuitionistic logic? The paper argues that in part the resemblance is superficial, in part it is due to selective attention, and in part topos theory is objectively tied to the motives for later intuit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Colin McLarty
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Éditions Kimé 2006-09-01
Series:Philosophia Scientiæ
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/philosophiascientiae/413
_version_ 1797402454260711424
author Colin McLarty
author_facet Colin McLarty
author_sort Colin McLarty
collection DOAJ
description Category theory has two unexpected links to constructivism: First, why is topos logic so close to intuitionistic logic? The paper argues that in part the resemblance is superficial, in part it is due to selective attention, and in part topos theory is objectively tied to the motives for later intuitionistic logic little related to Brouwer’s own stated motives. Second, why is so much of general category theory somehow constructive? The paper aims to synthesize three hypotheses on why it would be so, with three that suggest it is not.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T02:25:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3d877054a28e4d13bd594841900317f8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1281-2463
1775-4283
language deu
last_indexed 2024-03-09T02:25:32Z
publishDate 2006-09-01
publisher Éditions Kimé
record_format Article
series Philosophia Scientiæ
spelling doaj.art-3d877054a28e4d13bd594841900317f82023-12-06T15:54:46ZdeuÉditions KiméPhilosophia Scientiæ1281-24631775-42832006-09-0169511410.4000/philosophiascientiae.413Two Constructivist Aspects of Category TheoryColin McLartyCategory theory has two unexpected links to constructivism: First, why is topos logic so close to intuitionistic logic? The paper argues that in part the resemblance is superficial, in part it is due to selective attention, and in part topos theory is objectively tied to the motives for later intuitionistic logic little related to Brouwer’s own stated motives. Second, why is so much of general category theory somehow constructive? The paper aims to synthesize three hypotheses on why it would be so, with three that suggest it is not.http://journals.openedition.org/philosophiascientiae/413
spellingShingle Colin McLarty
Two Constructivist Aspects of Category Theory
Philosophia Scientiæ
title Two Constructivist Aspects of Category Theory
title_full Two Constructivist Aspects of Category Theory
title_fullStr Two Constructivist Aspects of Category Theory
title_full_unstemmed Two Constructivist Aspects of Category Theory
title_short Two Constructivist Aspects of Category Theory
title_sort two constructivist aspects of category theory
url http://journals.openedition.org/philosophiascientiae/413
work_keys_str_mv AT colinmclarty twoconstructivistaspectsofcategorytheory