A comparison of hole-filling methods in 3D
This paper presents a review of the most relevant current techniques that deal with hole-filling in 3D models. Contrary to earlier reports, which approach mesh repairing in a sparse and global manner, the objective of this review is twofold. First, a specific and comprehensive review of hole-filling...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Sciendo
2016-12-01
|
| Series: | International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1515/amcs-2016-0063 |
| _version_ | 1818909231090237440 |
|---|---|
| author | Pérez Emiliano Salamanca Santiago Merchán Pilar Adán Antonio |
| author_facet | Pérez Emiliano Salamanca Santiago Merchán Pilar Adán Antonio |
| author_sort | Pérez Emiliano |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This paper presents a review of the most relevant current techniques that deal with hole-filling in 3D models. Contrary to earlier reports, which approach mesh repairing in a sparse and global manner, the objective of this review is twofold. First, a specific and comprehensive review of hole-filling techniques (as a relevant part in the field of mesh repairing) is carried out. We present a brief summary of each technique with attention paid to its algorithmic essence, main contributions and limitations. Second, a solid comparison between 34 methods is established. To do this, we define 19 possible meaningful features and properties that can be found in a generic hole-filling process. Then, we use these features to assess the virtues and deficiencies of the method and to build comparative tables. The purpose of this review is to make a comparative hole-filling state-of-the-art available to researchers, showing pros and cons in a common framework. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-19T22:23:37Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-3d96521c820e46819ea6f4edce9cc779 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2083-8492 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-19T22:23:37Z |
| publishDate | 2016-12-01 |
| publisher | Sciendo |
| record_format | Article |
| series | International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science |
| spelling | doaj.art-3d96521c820e46819ea6f4edce9cc7792022-12-21T20:03:33ZengSciendoInternational Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science2083-84922016-12-0126488590310.1515/amcs-2016-0063amcs-2016-0063A comparison of hole-filling methods in 3DPérez Emiliano0Salamanca Santiago1Merchán Pilar2Adán Antonio3Industrial Engineering School University of Extremadura, Avda. Elvas, 06006 Badajoz, SpainIndustrial Engineering School University of Extremadura, Avda. Elvas, 06006 Badajoz, SpainIndustrial Engineering School University of Extremadura, Avda. Elvas, 06006 Badajoz, SpainComputer Science School University of Castilla–La Mancha, Paseo de la Universidad 4, 13071 Ciudad Real, SpainThis paper presents a review of the most relevant current techniques that deal with hole-filling in 3D models. Contrary to earlier reports, which approach mesh repairing in a sparse and global manner, the objective of this review is twofold. First, a specific and comprehensive review of hole-filling techniques (as a relevant part in the field of mesh repairing) is carried out. We present a brief summary of each technique with attention paid to its algorithmic essence, main contributions and limitations. Second, a solid comparison between 34 methods is established. To do this, we define 19 possible meaningful features and properties that can be found in a generic hole-filling process. Then, we use these features to assess the virtues and deficiencies of the method and to build comparative tables. The purpose of this review is to make a comparative hole-filling state-of-the-art available to researchers, showing pros and cons in a common framework.https://doi.org/10.1515/amcs-2016-0063survey3d polygonal modelsrepairing mesheshole-fillingrestoration algorithms |
| spellingShingle | Pérez Emiliano Salamanca Santiago Merchán Pilar Adán Antonio A comparison of hole-filling methods in 3D International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science survey 3d polygonal models repairing meshes hole-filling restoration algorithms |
| title | A comparison of hole-filling methods in 3D |
| title_full | A comparison of hole-filling methods in 3D |
| title_fullStr | A comparison of hole-filling methods in 3D |
| title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of hole-filling methods in 3D |
| title_short | A comparison of hole-filling methods in 3D |
| title_sort | comparison of hole filling methods in 3d |
| topic | survey 3d polygonal models repairing meshes hole-filling restoration algorithms |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1515/amcs-2016-0063 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT perezemiliano acomparisonofholefillingmethodsin3d AT salamancasantiago acomparisonofholefillingmethodsin3d AT merchanpilar acomparisonofholefillingmethodsin3d AT adanantonio acomparisonofholefillingmethodsin3d AT perezemiliano comparisonofholefillingmethodsin3d AT salamancasantiago comparisonofholefillingmethodsin3d AT merchanpilar comparisonofholefillingmethodsin3d AT adanantonio comparisonofholefillingmethodsin3d |