Editorial: Validity in assessment instruments

Given the growing number of papers on the validation and use of evaluation instruments that are submitted to  PJBSR, it may be time to consider the question of validity. The PJBSR expects the authors in their papers to explicitly discuss the validity of the instruments in the Methods section. If the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Helena Espirito Santo
Format: Article
Language:Portuguese
Published: Instituto Superior Miguel Torga 2017-02-01
Series:Revista Portuguesa de Investigação Comportamental e Social
Online Access:http://rpics.ismt.pt/index.php/ISMT/article/view/49
_version_ 1819228243999326208
author Helena Espirito Santo
author_facet Helena Espirito Santo
author_sort Helena Espirito Santo
collection DOAJ
description Given the growing number of papers on the validation and use of evaluation instruments that are submitted to  PJBSR, it may be time to consider the question of validity. The PJBSR expects the authors in their papers to explicitly discuss the validity of the instruments in the Methods section. If the authors use a previously studied instrument with the same format, with the same characteristics of subjects and for the same purpose, then it is sufficient to cite the previous reference. If the instrument is modified, the number of items changed, the objective is different, or the cut-off point is adjusted, then additional information on adaptation must be provided. In the case of new instruments created by the authors, it is essential to clarify the elaboration process, the reliability measures, the results of the pilot study and other information that make trustworthy the use of the evaluation instrument. Here are presented some key concepts in the domain of validity and reliability.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T10:54:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3d965de4b3f64d5db319050abf7c4cf2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2183-4938
language Portuguese
last_indexed 2024-12-23T10:54:11Z
publishDate 2017-02-01
publisher Instituto Superior Miguel Torga
record_format Article
series Revista Portuguesa de Investigação Comportamental e Social
spelling doaj.art-3d965de4b3f64d5db319050abf7c4cf22022-12-21T17:49:49ZporInstituto Superior Miguel TorgaRevista Portuguesa de Investigação Comportamental e Social2183-49382017-02-013110.7342/ismt.rpics.2017.3.1.4934Editorial: Validity in assessment instrumentsHelena Espirito Santo0Instituto Superior Miguel TorgaGiven the growing number of papers on the validation and use of evaluation instruments that are submitted to  PJBSR, it may be time to consider the question of validity. The PJBSR expects the authors in their papers to explicitly discuss the validity of the instruments in the Methods section. If the authors use a previously studied instrument with the same format, with the same characteristics of subjects and for the same purpose, then it is sufficient to cite the previous reference. If the instrument is modified, the number of items changed, the objective is different, or the cut-off point is adjusted, then additional information on adaptation must be provided. In the case of new instruments created by the authors, it is essential to clarify the elaboration process, the reliability measures, the results of the pilot study and other information that make trustworthy the use of the evaluation instrument. Here are presented some key concepts in the domain of validity and reliability.http://rpics.ismt.pt/index.php/ISMT/article/view/49
spellingShingle Helena Espirito Santo
Editorial: Validity in assessment instruments
Revista Portuguesa de Investigação Comportamental e Social
title Editorial: Validity in assessment instruments
title_full Editorial: Validity in assessment instruments
title_fullStr Editorial: Validity in assessment instruments
title_full_unstemmed Editorial: Validity in assessment instruments
title_short Editorial: Validity in assessment instruments
title_sort editorial validity in assessment instruments
url http://rpics.ismt.pt/index.php/ISMT/article/view/49
work_keys_str_mv AT helenaespiritosanto editorialvalidityinassessmentinstruments