Comparison of the Application of Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer and Jet Nebulizer in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis
Zhouzhou Feng,1 Zhengcai Han,1 Yaqin Wang,1 Hong Guo,1 Jian Liu1,2 1The First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou City, People’s Republic of China; 2Gansu Maternal and Child Health Hospital/Gansu Central Hospital, Lanzhou City, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Jian Liu,...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Dove Medical Press
2024-03-01
|
| Series: | International Journal of COPD |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.dovepress.com/comparison-of-the-application-of-vibrating-mesh-nebulizer-and-jet-nebu-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-COPD |
| _version_ | 1797231326494982144 |
|---|---|
| author | Feng Z Han Z Wang Y Guo H Liu J |
| author_facet | Feng Z Han Z Wang Y Guo H Liu J |
| author_sort | Feng Z |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Zhouzhou Feng,1 Zhengcai Han,1 Yaqin Wang,1 Hong Guo,1 Jian Liu1,2 1The First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou City, People’s Republic of China; 2Gansu Maternal and Child Health Hospital/Gansu Central Hospital, Lanzhou City, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Jian Liu, Department of Clinical Medicine, the First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, No. 1, Donggang West Road, Chengguan District, Lanzhou City, Gansu Province, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86 136 0935 4197, Email medecinliu@sina.comObjective: To comparison of the application of Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer and Jet Nebulizer in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).Research Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statements. The primary outcome measures analyzed included: The amount of inhaler in the urine sample at 30 minutes after inhalation therapy (USAL0.5), The total amount of inhaler in urine sample within 24 hours (USAL24), Aerosol emitted, Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), Forced vital capacity (FVC).Results: Ten studies were included with a total of 314 study participants, including 157 subjects in the VMN group and 157 subjects in the JN group. The data analysis results of USAL0.5, MD (1.88 [95% CI, 0.95 to 2.81], P = 0.000), showed a statistically significant difference. USAL24, MD (1.61 [95% CI, 1.14 to 2.09], P = 0.000), showed a statistically significant difference. The results of aerosol emitted showed a statistically significant difference in MD (3.44 [95% CI, 2.84 to 4.04], P = 0.000). The results of FEV1 showed MD (0.05 [95% CI, − 0.24 to 0.35], P=0.716), the results were not statistically significant. The results of FVC showed MD (0.11 [95% CI, − 0.18 to 0.41], P=0.459), the results were not statistically significant. It suggests that VMN is better than JN and provides higher aerosols, but there is no difference in improving lung function between them.Conclusion: VMN is significantly better than JN in terms of drug delivery and utilization in the treatment of patients with COPD. However, in the future use of nebulizers, it is important to select a matching nebulizer based on a combination of factors such as mechanism of action of the nebulizer, disease type and comorbidities, ventilation strategies and modes, drug formulations, as well as cost-effectiveness, in order to achieve the ideal treatment of COPD.Keywords: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, aerosol, vibrating mesh nebulizers, jet nebulizers, meta-analysis |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-24T15:42:36Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-3d990530d2984b789b0802d9f7d53b18 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1178-2005 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-24T15:42:36Z |
| publishDate | 2024-03-01 |
| publisher | Dove Medical Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | International Journal of COPD |
| spelling | doaj.art-3d990530d2984b789b0802d9f7d53b182024-04-01T18:03:50ZengDove Medical PressInternational Journal of COPD1178-20052024-03-01Volume 1982983991609Comparison of the Application of Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer and Jet Nebulizer in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysisFeng ZHan ZWang YGuo HLiu JZhouzhou Feng,1 Zhengcai Han,1 Yaqin Wang,1 Hong Guo,1 Jian Liu1,2 1The First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou City, People’s Republic of China; 2Gansu Maternal and Child Health Hospital/Gansu Central Hospital, Lanzhou City, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Jian Liu, Department of Clinical Medicine, the First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, No. 1, Donggang West Road, Chengguan District, Lanzhou City, Gansu Province, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86 136 0935 4197, Email medecinliu@sina.comObjective: To comparison of the application of Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer and Jet Nebulizer in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).Research Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statements. The primary outcome measures analyzed included: The amount of inhaler in the urine sample at 30 minutes after inhalation therapy (USAL0.5), The total amount of inhaler in urine sample within 24 hours (USAL24), Aerosol emitted, Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), Forced vital capacity (FVC).Results: Ten studies were included with a total of 314 study participants, including 157 subjects in the VMN group and 157 subjects in the JN group. The data analysis results of USAL0.5, MD (1.88 [95% CI, 0.95 to 2.81], P = 0.000), showed a statistically significant difference. USAL24, MD (1.61 [95% CI, 1.14 to 2.09], P = 0.000), showed a statistically significant difference. The results of aerosol emitted showed a statistically significant difference in MD (3.44 [95% CI, 2.84 to 4.04], P = 0.000). The results of FEV1 showed MD (0.05 [95% CI, − 0.24 to 0.35], P=0.716), the results were not statistically significant. The results of FVC showed MD (0.11 [95% CI, − 0.18 to 0.41], P=0.459), the results were not statistically significant. It suggests that VMN is better than JN and provides higher aerosols, but there is no difference in improving lung function between them.Conclusion: VMN is significantly better than JN in terms of drug delivery and utilization in the treatment of patients with COPD. However, in the future use of nebulizers, it is important to select a matching nebulizer based on a combination of factors such as mechanism of action of the nebulizer, disease type and comorbidities, ventilation strategies and modes, drug formulations, as well as cost-effectiveness, in order to achieve the ideal treatment of COPD.Keywords: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, aerosol, vibrating mesh nebulizers, jet nebulizers, meta-analysishttps://www.dovepress.com/comparison-of-the-application-of-vibrating-mesh-nebulizer-and-jet-nebu-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-COPDchronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseaerosolvibrating mesh nebulizersjet nebulizersmeta-analysis. |
| spellingShingle | Feng Z Han Z Wang Y Guo H Liu J Comparison of the Application of Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer and Jet Nebulizer in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis International Journal of COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease aerosol vibrating mesh nebulizers jet nebulizers meta-analysis. |
| title | Comparison of the Application of Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer and Jet Nebulizer in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis |
| title_full | Comparison of the Application of Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer and Jet Nebulizer in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of the Application of Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer and Jet Nebulizer in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the Application of Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer and Jet Nebulizer in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis |
| title_short | Comparison of the Application of Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer and Jet Nebulizer in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis |
| title_sort | comparison of the application of vibrating mesh nebulizer and jet nebulizer in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease a systematic review and meta x2010 analysis |
| topic | chronic obstructive pulmonary disease aerosol vibrating mesh nebulizers jet nebulizers meta-analysis. |
| url | https://www.dovepress.com/comparison-of-the-application-of-vibrating-mesh-nebulizer-and-jet-nebu-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-COPD |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT fengz comparisonoftheapplicationofvibratingmeshnebulizerandjetnebulizerinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetax2010analysis AT hanz comparisonoftheapplicationofvibratingmeshnebulizerandjetnebulizerinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetax2010analysis AT wangy comparisonoftheapplicationofvibratingmeshnebulizerandjetnebulizerinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetax2010analysis AT guoh comparisonoftheapplicationofvibratingmeshnebulizerandjetnebulizerinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetax2010analysis AT liuj comparisonoftheapplicationofvibratingmeshnebulizerandjetnebulizerinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetax2010analysis |