COMPARISON BETWEEN ABSORBED DOSES IN TARGET ORGANS IN PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY, USING SINGLE EMULSION AND DOUBLE EMULSION FILMS

"nThe use of panoramic radiography, due to its numerous advantages, is increasing. Radiographic films used in this technique are of double emulsion (DE) type which are used with intensifying screens. Single emulsion (SE) films can also be used. The purpose of this study was to determine the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. R. Talaeipour, S. Sakhdari S. Sahba
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2007-07-01
Series:Acta Medica Iranica
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.tums.ac.ir/PdfMed.aspx?pdf_med=/upload_files/pdf/3803.pdf&manuscript_id=3803
_version_ 1818533615444688896
author A. R. Talaeipour
S. Sakhdari S. Sahba
author_facet A. R. Talaeipour
S. Sakhdari S. Sahba
author_sort A. R. Talaeipour
collection DOAJ
description "nThe use of panoramic radiography, due to its numerous advantages, is increasing. Radiographic films used in this technique are of double emulsion (DE) type which are used with intensifying screens. Single emulsion (SE) films can also be used. The purpose of this study was to determine the exposure parameters to achieve an appropriate optical density in these two types of films, and to estimate under such parameters, radiation doses to mandibular bone marrow (MBM), thyroid gland and parotid gland. This study was performed through a tissue equivalent phantom. First, with various tube voltage and tube current, 128 radiographs were taken of phantom with these two types of films. After examining the optical densities, the exposure parameters under which both films have the same density, were determined. Then, phantom again was exposed and MBM, thyroid gland and parotid gland absorbed doses were measured, using TLDs. It was demonstrated that: 1) SE films, in order to provide appropriate optical density, require two times radiation in comparison with double emulsion film; 2) using SE films increases MBM dose, up to 2-2.5 times, thyroid gland dose up to 1.7-2 times and parotid gland dose up to 1.3 times, in comparison with DE films; 3) in DE films, under lower exposure parameters and desirable processing, MBM dose up to 3.5 times, thyroid gland dose up to 1.5 times and parotid gland dose up to 2.5 times will increase. Considering that the risk of radiation induced cancers increases with repeated radiation doses, using SE films is not recommended.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T18:01:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3da2bbafc3264ab49dff00f672bcd84c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0044-6025
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T18:01:03Z
publishDate 2007-07-01
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series Acta Medica Iranica
spelling doaj.art-3da2bbafc3264ab49dff00f672bcd84c2022-12-22T00:55:53ZengTehran University of Medical SciencesActa Medica Iranica0044-60252007-07-01453171176COMPARISON BETWEEN ABSORBED DOSES IN TARGET ORGANS IN PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY, USING SINGLE EMULSION AND DOUBLE EMULSION FILMSA. R. TalaeipourS. Sakhdari S. Sahba"nThe use of panoramic radiography, due to its numerous advantages, is increasing. Radiographic films used in this technique are of double emulsion (DE) type which are used with intensifying screens. Single emulsion (SE) films can also be used. The purpose of this study was to determine the exposure parameters to achieve an appropriate optical density in these two types of films, and to estimate under such parameters, radiation doses to mandibular bone marrow (MBM), thyroid gland and parotid gland. This study was performed through a tissue equivalent phantom. First, with various tube voltage and tube current, 128 radiographs were taken of phantom with these two types of films. After examining the optical densities, the exposure parameters under which both films have the same density, were determined. Then, phantom again was exposed and MBM, thyroid gland and parotid gland absorbed doses were measured, using TLDs. It was demonstrated that: 1) SE films, in order to provide appropriate optical density, require two times radiation in comparison with double emulsion film; 2) using SE films increases MBM dose, up to 2-2.5 times, thyroid gland dose up to 1.7-2 times and parotid gland dose up to 1.3 times, in comparison with DE films; 3) in DE films, under lower exposure parameters and desirable processing, MBM dose up to 3.5 times, thyroid gland dose up to 1.5 times and parotid gland dose up to 2.5 times will increase. Considering that the risk of radiation induced cancers increases with repeated radiation doses, using SE films is not recommended.http://journals.tums.ac.ir/PdfMed.aspx?pdf_med=/upload_files/pdf/3803.pdf&manuscript_id=3803Double emulsion filmsDensitometryDosimetrySingle emulsion films
spellingShingle A. R. Talaeipour
S. Sakhdari S. Sahba
COMPARISON BETWEEN ABSORBED DOSES IN TARGET ORGANS IN PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY, USING SINGLE EMULSION AND DOUBLE EMULSION FILMS
Acta Medica Iranica
Double emulsion films
Densitometry
Dosimetry
Single emulsion films
title COMPARISON BETWEEN ABSORBED DOSES IN TARGET ORGANS IN PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY, USING SINGLE EMULSION AND DOUBLE EMULSION FILMS
title_full COMPARISON BETWEEN ABSORBED DOSES IN TARGET ORGANS IN PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY, USING SINGLE EMULSION AND DOUBLE EMULSION FILMS
title_fullStr COMPARISON BETWEEN ABSORBED DOSES IN TARGET ORGANS IN PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY, USING SINGLE EMULSION AND DOUBLE EMULSION FILMS
title_full_unstemmed COMPARISON BETWEEN ABSORBED DOSES IN TARGET ORGANS IN PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY, USING SINGLE EMULSION AND DOUBLE EMULSION FILMS
title_short COMPARISON BETWEEN ABSORBED DOSES IN TARGET ORGANS IN PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY, USING SINGLE EMULSION AND DOUBLE EMULSION FILMS
title_sort comparison between absorbed doses in target organs in panoramic radiography using single emulsion and double emulsion films
topic Double emulsion films
Densitometry
Dosimetry
Single emulsion films
url http://journals.tums.ac.ir/PdfMed.aspx?pdf_med=/upload_files/pdf/3803.pdf&manuscript_id=3803
work_keys_str_mv AT artalaeipour comparisonbetweenabsorbeddosesintargetorgansinpanoramicradiographyusingsingleemulsionanddoubleemulsionfilms
AT ssakhdarissahba comparisonbetweenabsorbeddosesintargetorgansinpanoramicradiographyusingsingleemulsionanddoubleemulsionfilms