Measuring light absorption by freshly emitted organic aerosols: optical artifacts in traditional solvent-extraction-based methods

<p>Recent studies have shown that organic aerosol (OA) could have a nontrivial role in atmospheric light absorption at shorter visible wavelengths. Good estimates of OA light absorption are therefore necessary to better estimate radiative forcing due to these aerosols in climate models. One of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: N. J. Shetty, A. Pandey, S. Baker, W. M. Hao, R. K. Chakrabarty
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2019-07-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/19/8817/2019/acp-19-8817-2019.pdf
_version_ 1818131885389250560
author N. J. Shetty
A. Pandey
S. Baker
W. M. Hao
R. K. Chakrabarty
R. K. Chakrabarty
author_facet N. J. Shetty
A. Pandey
S. Baker
W. M. Hao
R. K. Chakrabarty
R. K. Chakrabarty
author_sort N. J. Shetty
collection DOAJ
description <p>Recent studies have shown that organic aerosol (OA) could have a nontrivial role in atmospheric light absorption at shorter visible wavelengths. Good estimates of OA light absorption are therefore necessary to better estimate radiative forcing due to these aerosols in climate models. One of the common techniques used to measure OA light absorption is the solvent extraction technique from filter samples which involves the use of a spectrophotometer to measure bulk absorbance by the solvent-soluble organic fraction of particulate matter. Measured solvent-phase absorbance is subsequently converted to particle-phase absorption coefficient using scaling factors. The conventional view is to apply a correction factor of 2 to absorption coefficients obtained from solvent-extracted OA based on Mie calculations. The appropriate scaling factors are a function of biases due to incomplete extraction of organic carbon (OC) by solvents and size-dependent absorption properties of OA. The range for these biases along with their potential dependence on burn conditions is an unexplored area of research.</p> <p>Here, we performed a comprehensive laboratory study involving three solvents (water, methanol, and acetone) to investigate the bias in absorption coefficients obtained from solvent-extraction-based photometry techniques as compared to in situ particle-phase absorption for freshly emitted OA from biomass burning. We correlated the bias with <span class="inline-formula">OC∕TC</span> (total carbon) mass ratio and single scattering albedo (SSA) and observed that the conventionally used correction factor of 2 for water and methanol-extracted OA might not be extensible to all systems, and we suggest caution while using such correction factors to estimate particle-phase OA absorption coefficients. Furthermore, a linear correlation between SSA and the <span class="inline-formula">OC∕TC</span> ratio was also established. Finally, from the spectroscopic data, we analyzed the differences in absorption Ångström exponents (AÅE) obtained from solution- and particulate-phase measurements. We noted that AÅE from solvent-phase measurements could deviate significantly from their OA counterparts.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-11T08:28:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3da69422f39c4177bb7d07c84b70e468
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1680-7316
1680-7324
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T08:28:02Z
publishDate 2019-07-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
spelling doaj.art-3da69422f39c4177bb7d07c84b70e4682022-12-22T01:14:31ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242019-07-01198817883010.5194/acp-19-8817-2019Measuring light absorption by freshly emitted organic aerosols: optical artifacts in traditional solvent-extraction-based methodsN. J. Shetty0A. Pandey1S. Baker2W. M. Hao3R. K. Chakrabarty4R. K. Chakrabarty5Center for Aerosol Science and Engineering, Department of Energy, Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USACenter for Aerosol Science and Engineering, Department of Energy, Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USAUSDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, Montana, USAUSDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, Montana, USACenter for Aerosol Science and Engineering, Department of Energy, Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USAMcDonnell Center for the Space Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA<p>Recent studies have shown that organic aerosol (OA) could have a nontrivial role in atmospheric light absorption at shorter visible wavelengths. Good estimates of OA light absorption are therefore necessary to better estimate radiative forcing due to these aerosols in climate models. One of the common techniques used to measure OA light absorption is the solvent extraction technique from filter samples which involves the use of a spectrophotometer to measure bulk absorbance by the solvent-soluble organic fraction of particulate matter. Measured solvent-phase absorbance is subsequently converted to particle-phase absorption coefficient using scaling factors. The conventional view is to apply a correction factor of 2 to absorption coefficients obtained from solvent-extracted OA based on Mie calculations. The appropriate scaling factors are a function of biases due to incomplete extraction of organic carbon (OC) by solvents and size-dependent absorption properties of OA. The range for these biases along with their potential dependence on burn conditions is an unexplored area of research.</p> <p>Here, we performed a comprehensive laboratory study involving three solvents (water, methanol, and acetone) to investigate the bias in absorption coefficients obtained from solvent-extraction-based photometry techniques as compared to in situ particle-phase absorption for freshly emitted OA from biomass burning. We correlated the bias with <span class="inline-formula">OC∕TC</span> (total carbon) mass ratio and single scattering albedo (SSA) and observed that the conventionally used correction factor of 2 for water and methanol-extracted OA might not be extensible to all systems, and we suggest caution while using such correction factors to estimate particle-phase OA absorption coefficients. Furthermore, a linear correlation between SSA and the <span class="inline-formula">OC∕TC</span> ratio was also established. Finally, from the spectroscopic data, we analyzed the differences in absorption Ångström exponents (AÅE) obtained from solution- and particulate-phase measurements. We noted that AÅE from solvent-phase measurements could deviate significantly from their OA counterparts.</p>https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/19/8817/2019/acp-19-8817-2019.pdf
spellingShingle N. J. Shetty
A. Pandey
S. Baker
W. M. Hao
R. K. Chakrabarty
R. K. Chakrabarty
Measuring light absorption by freshly emitted organic aerosols: optical artifacts in traditional solvent-extraction-based methods
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
title Measuring light absorption by freshly emitted organic aerosols: optical artifacts in traditional solvent-extraction-based methods
title_full Measuring light absorption by freshly emitted organic aerosols: optical artifacts in traditional solvent-extraction-based methods
title_fullStr Measuring light absorption by freshly emitted organic aerosols: optical artifacts in traditional solvent-extraction-based methods
title_full_unstemmed Measuring light absorption by freshly emitted organic aerosols: optical artifacts in traditional solvent-extraction-based methods
title_short Measuring light absorption by freshly emitted organic aerosols: optical artifacts in traditional solvent-extraction-based methods
title_sort measuring light absorption by freshly emitted organic aerosols optical artifacts in traditional solvent extraction based methods
url https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/19/8817/2019/acp-19-8817-2019.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT njshetty measuringlightabsorptionbyfreshlyemittedorganicaerosolsopticalartifactsintraditionalsolventextractionbasedmethods
AT apandey measuringlightabsorptionbyfreshlyemittedorganicaerosolsopticalartifactsintraditionalsolventextractionbasedmethods
AT sbaker measuringlightabsorptionbyfreshlyemittedorganicaerosolsopticalartifactsintraditionalsolventextractionbasedmethods
AT wmhao measuringlightabsorptionbyfreshlyemittedorganicaerosolsopticalartifactsintraditionalsolventextractionbasedmethods
AT rkchakrabarty measuringlightabsorptionbyfreshlyemittedorganicaerosolsopticalartifactsintraditionalsolventextractionbasedmethods
AT rkchakrabarty measuringlightabsorptionbyfreshlyemittedorganicaerosolsopticalartifactsintraditionalsolventextractionbasedmethods