Safety of restarting continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy following endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery

Abstract Objectives Patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) are at increased risk of perioperative and postoperative morbidity. The use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in the perioperative period may be of potential benefit. However, among patients who have undergone endonasal skul...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mark B. Chaskes, Mindy R. Rabinowitz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-03-01
Series:World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wjorl.2021.07.002
Description
Summary:Abstract Objectives Patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) are at increased risk of perioperative and postoperative morbidity. The use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in the perioperative period may be of potential benefit. However, among patients who have undergone endonasal skull base surgery, many surgeons avoid prompt re‐initiation of CPAP therapy due to the theoretical increased risk of epistaxis, excessive dryness, pneumocephalus, repair migration, intracranial introduction of bacteria, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak. The objective of this article is to review the most up‐to‐date literature regarding when it is safe to resume CPAP usage in the patient undergoing endonasal skull base surgery. Data Sources and Methods This review combines the most recent literature as queried through PubMed regarding the safety of CPAP resumption following endonasal skull base surgery. Results Recent surveys of skull base surgeons demonstrate little consensus regarding the post‐operative management of OSA. Recent cadaveric studies suggest that approximately 85% of delivered CPAP pressures are transmitted to the sphenoid sinus. Further, at frequently prescribed CPAP pressure settings, common sellar reconstruction techniques maintain their integrity while preventing very little transmission of pressure into the sella. In small retrospective case series, patients with OSA who received CPAP immediately following transsphenoidal pituitary surgery had similar rates of surgical complications as OSA patients who did not receive CPAP in the immediate post‐operative period. Concerns of re‐initiating CPAP too early, such as the development of pneumocephalus, rarely develop. Conclusions There remains a paucity of objective data regarding when it is safe to resume CPAP following endonasal skull base surgery. Recent cadaveric studies and small retrospective case series suggest that it may be safe to resume CPAP earlier than is often practiced following endonasal skull base surgery.
ISSN:2095-8811
2589-1081