Improving the Accuracy of Land Use and Land Cover Classification of Landsat Data in an Agricultural Watershed

Classification of remotely sensed imagery for reliable land use and land cover (LULC) remains a challenge in areas where spectrally similar LULC features occur. For example, bare soils of harvested crop fields in agricultural watersheds exhibit spectral characteristics similar to high-intensity deve...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Padmanava Dash, Scott L. Sanders, Prem Parajuli, Ying Ouyang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-08-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/16/4020
_version_ 1797583332847910912
author Padmanava Dash
Scott L. Sanders
Prem Parajuli
Ying Ouyang
author_facet Padmanava Dash
Scott L. Sanders
Prem Parajuli
Ying Ouyang
author_sort Padmanava Dash
collection DOAJ
description Classification of remotely sensed imagery for reliable land use and land cover (LULC) remains a challenge in areas where spectrally similar LULC features occur. For example, bare soils of harvested crop fields in agricultural watersheds exhibit spectral characteristics similar to high-intensity developed regions and impede an accurate classification. The goal of this study is to improve the accuracy of LULC classification of satellite imagery for the Big Sunflower River Watershed, Mississippi using ancillary data, multiple classification methods, and a post-classification correction (PCC). To determine the best approach, the methodology was applied to Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) imagery during the growing season and post-harvest. Imagery for the growing season was acquired on 25 August 2015, and post-harvest was acquired on 7 January 2018. Three classification methods were applied: maximum likelihood (ML), support vector machine (SVM), and random forest (RF). LULC imagery was classified as open water, woody wetlands, harvested crop, rangeland, cultivated crop, high-intensity developed, and mid-low intensity developed areas. Ancillary data such as normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), thematic maps of urban areas, river networks, transportation networks, high-resolution National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) imagery, Google Earth time-series data, and phenology were used to determine the training dataset. Initially none of the three classification methods performed adequately. Hence, a post-classification correction (PCC) was implemented by masking and applying a majority filter using thematic maps of urban areas. Once PCC was implemented, the accuracies from each of the classification methods increased significantly with the SVM classification method performing best in both the growing season and post-harvest with an overall classification accuracy of 93.5% with a Kappa statistic of 0.88 in the post-harvest imagery and an overall classification accuracy of 84% with a Kappa statistic of 0.789 in the imagery from the growing season. It was found that SVM was the best classification method while PCC is an effective strategy to implement when dealing with spectrally similar LULC features. The use of SVM together with PCC increased the reliability of the information extracted. Strategies from this study can help to evaluate the LULC in agricultural and other watersheds.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T23:36:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3dc2f21d84cc4eff9f505c8695f510d8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-4292
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T23:36:27Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Remote Sensing
spelling doaj.art-3dc2f21d84cc4eff9f505c8695f510d82023-11-19T02:53:26ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922023-08-011516402010.3390/rs15164020Improving the Accuracy of Land Use and Land Cover Classification of Landsat Data in an Agricultural WatershedPadmanava Dash0Scott L. Sanders1Prem Parajuli2Ying Ouyang3Department of Geosciences, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USADepartment of Geosciences, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USADepartment of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USAUSDA Forest Service, Center for Bottomland Hardwoods Research, 775 Stone Blvd., Thompson Hall, Room 309, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USAClassification of remotely sensed imagery for reliable land use and land cover (LULC) remains a challenge in areas where spectrally similar LULC features occur. For example, bare soils of harvested crop fields in agricultural watersheds exhibit spectral characteristics similar to high-intensity developed regions and impede an accurate classification. The goal of this study is to improve the accuracy of LULC classification of satellite imagery for the Big Sunflower River Watershed, Mississippi using ancillary data, multiple classification methods, and a post-classification correction (PCC). To determine the best approach, the methodology was applied to Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) imagery during the growing season and post-harvest. Imagery for the growing season was acquired on 25 August 2015, and post-harvest was acquired on 7 January 2018. Three classification methods were applied: maximum likelihood (ML), support vector machine (SVM), and random forest (RF). LULC imagery was classified as open water, woody wetlands, harvested crop, rangeland, cultivated crop, high-intensity developed, and mid-low intensity developed areas. Ancillary data such as normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), thematic maps of urban areas, river networks, transportation networks, high-resolution National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) imagery, Google Earth time-series data, and phenology were used to determine the training dataset. Initially none of the three classification methods performed adequately. Hence, a post-classification correction (PCC) was implemented by masking and applying a majority filter using thematic maps of urban areas. Once PCC was implemented, the accuracies from each of the classification methods increased significantly with the SVM classification method performing best in both the growing season and post-harvest with an overall classification accuracy of 93.5% with a Kappa statistic of 0.88 in the post-harvest imagery and an overall classification accuracy of 84% with a Kappa statistic of 0.789 in the imagery from the growing season. It was found that SVM was the best classification method while PCC is an effective strategy to implement when dealing with spectrally similar LULC features. The use of SVM together with PCC increased the reliability of the information extracted. Strategies from this study can help to evaluate the LULC in agricultural and other watersheds.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/16/4020land use and land coverclassificationagricultural watershedmaximum likelihoodsupport vector machinerandom forest
spellingShingle Padmanava Dash
Scott L. Sanders
Prem Parajuli
Ying Ouyang
Improving the Accuracy of Land Use and Land Cover Classification of Landsat Data in an Agricultural Watershed
Remote Sensing
land use and land cover
classification
agricultural watershed
maximum likelihood
support vector machine
random forest
title Improving the Accuracy of Land Use and Land Cover Classification of Landsat Data in an Agricultural Watershed
title_full Improving the Accuracy of Land Use and Land Cover Classification of Landsat Data in an Agricultural Watershed
title_fullStr Improving the Accuracy of Land Use and Land Cover Classification of Landsat Data in an Agricultural Watershed
title_full_unstemmed Improving the Accuracy of Land Use and Land Cover Classification of Landsat Data in an Agricultural Watershed
title_short Improving the Accuracy of Land Use and Land Cover Classification of Landsat Data in an Agricultural Watershed
title_sort improving the accuracy of land use and land cover classification of landsat data in an agricultural watershed
topic land use and land cover
classification
agricultural watershed
maximum likelihood
support vector machine
random forest
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/16/4020
work_keys_str_mv AT padmanavadash improvingtheaccuracyoflanduseandlandcoverclassificationoflandsatdatainanagriculturalwatershed
AT scottlsanders improvingtheaccuracyoflanduseandlandcoverclassificationoflandsatdatainanagriculturalwatershed
AT premparajuli improvingtheaccuracyoflanduseandlandcoverclassificationoflandsatdatainanagriculturalwatershed
AT yingouyang improvingtheaccuracyoflanduseandlandcoverclassificationoflandsatdatainanagriculturalwatershed