Adaptation and validation of the Charlson Index for Read/OXMIS coded databases

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The Charlson comorbidity index is widely used in ICD-9 administrative data, however, there is no translation for Read/OXMIS coded data despite increasing use of the General Practice Research Database (GPRD). Our main objective was to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Harper Stephen, Perera Rafael, Khan Nada F, Rose Peter W
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2010-01-01
Series:BMC Family Practice
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2296/11/1
_version_ 1811227328268730368
author Harper Stephen
Perera Rafael
Khan Nada F
Rose Peter W
author_facet Harper Stephen
Perera Rafael
Khan Nada F
Rose Peter W
author_sort Harper Stephen
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The Charlson comorbidity index is widely used in ICD-9 administrative data, however, there is no translation for Read/OXMIS coded data despite increasing use of the General Practice Research Database (GPRD). Our main objective was to translate the Charlson index for use with Read/OXMIS coded data such as the GPRD and test its association with mortality. We also aimed to provide a version of the comorbidity index for other researchers using similar datasets.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Two clinicians translated the Charlson index into Read/OXMIS codes. We tested the association between comorbidity score and increased mortality in 146 441 patients from the GPRD using proportional hazards models.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>This Read/OXMIS translation of the Charlson index contains 3156 codes. Our validation showed a strong positive association between Charlson score and age. Cox proportional models show a positive increasing association with mortality and Charlson score. The discrimination of the logistic regression model for mortality was good (AUC = 0.853).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>We have translated a commonly used comorbidity index into Read/OXMIS for use in UK primary care databases. The translated index showed a good discrimination in our study population. This is the first study to develop a co-morbidity index for use with the Read/OXMIS coding system and the GPRD. A copy of the co-morbidity index is provided for other researchers using similar databases.</p>
first_indexed 2024-04-12T09:40:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3dc5786369b040f0b6f8d771ac974cfa
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2296
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T09:40:52Z
publishDate 2010-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Family Practice
spelling doaj.art-3dc5786369b040f0b6f8d771ac974cfa2022-12-22T03:38:04ZengBMCBMC Family Practice1471-22962010-01-01111110.1186/1471-2296-11-1Adaptation and validation of the Charlson Index for Read/OXMIS coded databasesHarper StephenPerera RafaelKhan Nada FRose Peter W<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The Charlson comorbidity index is widely used in ICD-9 administrative data, however, there is no translation for Read/OXMIS coded data despite increasing use of the General Practice Research Database (GPRD). Our main objective was to translate the Charlson index for use with Read/OXMIS coded data such as the GPRD and test its association with mortality. We also aimed to provide a version of the comorbidity index for other researchers using similar datasets.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Two clinicians translated the Charlson index into Read/OXMIS codes. We tested the association between comorbidity score and increased mortality in 146 441 patients from the GPRD using proportional hazards models.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>This Read/OXMIS translation of the Charlson index contains 3156 codes. Our validation showed a strong positive association between Charlson score and age. Cox proportional models show a positive increasing association with mortality and Charlson score. The discrimination of the logistic regression model for mortality was good (AUC = 0.853).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>We have translated a commonly used comorbidity index into Read/OXMIS for use in UK primary care databases. The translated index showed a good discrimination in our study population. This is the first study to develop a co-morbidity index for use with the Read/OXMIS coding system and the GPRD. A copy of the co-morbidity index is provided for other researchers using similar databases.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2296/11/1
spellingShingle Harper Stephen
Perera Rafael
Khan Nada F
Rose Peter W
Adaptation and validation of the Charlson Index for Read/OXMIS coded databases
BMC Family Practice
title Adaptation and validation of the Charlson Index for Read/OXMIS coded databases
title_full Adaptation and validation of the Charlson Index for Read/OXMIS coded databases
title_fullStr Adaptation and validation of the Charlson Index for Read/OXMIS coded databases
title_full_unstemmed Adaptation and validation of the Charlson Index for Read/OXMIS coded databases
title_short Adaptation and validation of the Charlson Index for Read/OXMIS coded databases
title_sort adaptation and validation of the charlson index for read oxmis coded databases
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2296/11/1
work_keys_str_mv AT harperstephen adaptationandvalidationofthecharlsonindexforreadoxmiscodeddatabases
AT pererarafael adaptationandvalidationofthecharlsonindexforreadoxmiscodeddatabases
AT khannadaf adaptationandvalidationofthecharlsonindexforreadoxmiscodeddatabases
AT rosepeterw adaptationandvalidationofthecharlsonindexforreadoxmiscodeddatabases