The influence of transcription factor competition on the relationship between occupancy and affinity.
Transcription factors (TFs) are proteins that bind to specific sites on the DNA and regulate gene activity. Identifying where TF molecules bind and how much time they spend on their target sites is key to understanding transcriptional regulation. It is usually assumed that the free energy of binding...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2013-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3785477?pdf=render |
| _version_ | 1811326003741458432 |
|---|---|
| author | Nicolae Radu Zabet Robert Foy Boris Adryan |
| author_facet | Nicolae Radu Zabet Robert Foy Boris Adryan |
| author_sort | Nicolae Radu Zabet |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Transcription factors (TFs) are proteins that bind to specific sites on the DNA and regulate gene activity. Identifying where TF molecules bind and how much time they spend on their target sites is key to understanding transcriptional regulation. It is usually assumed that the free energy of binding of a TF to the DNA (the affinity of the site) is highly correlated to the amount of time the TF remains bound (the occupancy of the site). However, knowing the binding energy is not sufficient to infer actual binding site occupancy. This mismatch between the occupancy predicted by the affinity and the observed occupancy may be caused by various factors, such as TF abundance, competition between TFs or the arrangement of the sites on the DNA. We investigated the relationship between the affinity of a TF for a set of binding sites and their occupancy. In particular, we considered the case of the transcription factor lac repressor (lacI) in E.coli, and performed stochastic simulations of the TF dynamics on the DNA for various combinations of lacI abundance and competing TFs that contribute to macromolecular crowding. We also investigated the relationship of site occupancy and the information content of position weight matrices (PWMs) used to represent binding sites. Our results showed that for medium and high affinity sites, TF competition does not play a significant role for genomic occupancy except in cases when the abundance of the TF is significantly increased, or when the PWM displays relatively low information content. Nevertheless, for medium and low affinity sites, an increase in TF abundance (for both cognate and non-cognate molecules) leads to an increase in occupancy at several sites. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-13T14:42:20Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-3dc587d85f52469b9ee08cfef2875646 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-13T14:42:20Z |
| publishDate | 2013-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-3dc587d85f52469b9ee08cfef28756462022-12-22T02:42:51ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-0189e7371410.1371/journal.pone.0073714The influence of transcription factor competition on the relationship between occupancy and affinity.Nicolae Radu ZabetRobert FoyBoris AdryanTranscription factors (TFs) are proteins that bind to specific sites on the DNA and regulate gene activity. Identifying where TF molecules bind and how much time they spend on their target sites is key to understanding transcriptional regulation. It is usually assumed that the free energy of binding of a TF to the DNA (the affinity of the site) is highly correlated to the amount of time the TF remains bound (the occupancy of the site). However, knowing the binding energy is not sufficient to infer actual binding site occupancy. This mismatch between the occupancy predicted by the affinity and the observed occupancy may be caused by various factors, such as TF abundance, competition between TFs or the arrangement of the sites on the DNA. We investigated the relationship between the affinity of a TF for a set of binding sites and their occupancy. In particular, we considered the case of the transcription factor lac repressor (lacI) in E.coli, and performed stochastic simulations of the TF dynamics on the DNA for various combinations of lacI abundance and competing TFs that contribute to macromolecular crowding. We also investigated the relationship of site occupancy and the information content of position weight matrices (PWMs) used to represent binding sites. Our results showed that for medium and high affinity sites, TF competition does not play a significant role for genomic occupancy except in cases when the abundance of the TF is significantly increased, or when the PWM displays relatively low information content. Nevertheless, for medium and low affinity sites, an increase in TF abundance (for both cognate and non-cognate molecules) leads to an increase in occupancy at several sites.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3785477?pdf=render |
| spellingShingle | Nicolae Radu Zabet Robert Foy Boris Adryan The influence of transcription factor competition on the relationship between occupancy and affinity. PLoS ONE |
| title | The influence of transcription factor competition on the relationship between occupancy and affinity. |
| title_full | The influence of transcription factor competition on the relationship between occupancy and affinity. |
| title_fullStr | The influence of transcription factor competition on the relationship between occupancy and affinity. |
| title_full_unstemmed | The influence of transcription factor competition on the relationship between occupancy and affinity. |
| title_short | The influence of transcription factor competition on the relationship between occupancy and affinity. |
| title_sort | influence of transcription factor competition on the relationship between occupancy and affinity |
| url | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3785477?pdf=render |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT nicolaeraduzabet theinfluenceoftranscriptionfactorcompetitionontherelationshipbetweenoccupancyandaffinity AT robertfoy theinfluenceoftranscriptionfactorcompetitionontherelationshipbetweenoccupancyandaffinity AT borisadryan theinfluenceoftranscriptionfactorcompetitionontherelationshipbetweenoccupancyandaffinity AT nicolaeraduzabet influenceoftranscriptionfactorcompetitionontherelationshipbetweenoccupancyandaffinity AT robertfoy influenceoftranscriptionfactorcompetitionontherelationshipbetweenoccupancyandaffinity AT borisadryan influenceoftranscriptionfactorcompetitionontherelationshipbetweenoccupancyandaffinity |