Effects of the differences between the ITRF2000 and ITRF2005 models in GNSS data processing
In comparison with the ITRF2000 model, the ITRF2005 model represents a significant improvement in solution generation, datum definition and realization. However, these improvements cause a frame difference between the ITRF2000 and ITRF2005 models, which may impact GNSS data processing. To quantify t...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.
2013-01-01
|
| Series: | Geodesy and Geodynamics |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674984715302238 |
| _version_ | 1818412941359185920 |
|---|---|
| author | Zhan Wei Zhu Shuang Yang Bo Wu Yanqiang Liu Zhiguang Meng Xiangang |
| author_facet | Zhan Wei Zhu Shuang Yang Bo Wu Yanqiang Liu Zhiguang Meng Xiangang |
| author_sort | Zhan Wei |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | In comparison with the ITRF2000 model, the ITRF2005 model represents a significant improvement in solution generation, datum definition and realization. However, these improvements cause a frame difference between the ITRF2000 and ITRF2005 models, which may impact GNSS data processing. To quantify this impact, the differences of the GNSS results obtained using the two models, including station coordinates, baseline length and horizontal velocity field, were analyzed. After transformation, the differences in position were at the millimeter level, and the differences in baseline length were less than 1 mm. The differences in the horizontal velocity fields decreased with as the study area was reduced. For a large region, the differences in these value were less than 1 mm/a, with a systematic difference of approximately 2 degrees in direction, while for a medium-sized region, the differences in value and direction were not significant. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-14T10:55:18Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-3dc89d732507464cb4cd168145cbf2e3 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1674-9847 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-14T10:55:18Z |
| publishDate | 2013-01-01 |
| publisher | KeAi Communications Co., Ltd. |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Geodesy and Geodynamics |
| spelling | doaj.art-3dc89d732507464cb4cd168145cbf2e32022-12-21T23:04:59ZengKeAi Communications Co., Ltd.Geodesy and Geodynamics1674-98472013-01-0144465010.3724/SP.J.1246.2013.04046Effects of the differences between the ITRF2000 and ITRF2005 models in GNSS data processingZhan Wei0Zhu Shuang1Yang Bo2Wu Yanqiang3Liu Zhiguang4Meng Xiangang5State Key Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying, Mapping and Remote Sensing, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, ChinaFirst Crust Monitoring and Application Center, China Earthquake Administration, Tianjin 300180, ChinaFirst Crust Monitoring and Application Center, China Earthquake Administration, Tianjin 300180, ChinaInstitute of Earthquake Science, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100036, ChinaFirst Crust Monitoring and Application Center, China Earthquake Administration, Tianjin 300180, ChinaFirst Crust Monitoring and Application Center, China Earthquake Administration, Tianjin 300180, ChinaIn comparison with the ITRF2000 model, the ITRF2005 model represents a significant improvement in solution generation, datum definition and realization. However, these improvements cause a frame difference between the ITRF2000 and ITRF2005 models, which may impact GNSS data processing. To quantify this impact, the differences of the GNSS results obtained using the two models, including station coordinates, baseline length and horizontal velocity field, were analyzed. After transformation, the differences in position were at the millimeter level, and the differences in baseline length were less than 1 mm. The differences in the horizontal velocity fields decreased with as the study area was reduced. For a large region, the differences in these value were less than 1 mm/a, with a systematic difference of approximately 2 degrees in direction, while for a medium-sized region, the differences in value and direction were not significant.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674984715302238ITRF2000ITRF2005GNSS data processingdifferenceeffect |
| spellingShingle | Zhan Wei Zhu Shuang Yang Bo Wu Yanqiang Liu Zhiguang Meng Xiangang Effects of the differences between the ITRF2000 and ITRF2005 models in GNSS data processing Geodesy and Geodynamics ITRF2000 ITRF2005 GNSS data processing difference effect |
| title | Effects of the differences between the ITRF2000 and ITRF2005 models in GNSS data processing |
| title_full | Effects of the differences between the ITRF2000 and ITRF2005 models in GNSS data processing |
| title_fullStr | Effects of the differences between the ITRF2000 and ITRF2005 models in GNSS data processing |
| title_full_unstemmed | Effects of the differences between the ITRF2000 and ITRF2005 models in GNSS data processing |
| title_short | Effects of the differences between the ITRF2000 and ITRF2005 models in GNSS data processing |
| title_sort | effects of the differences between the itrf2000 and itrf2005 models in gnss data processing |
| topic | ITRF2000 ITRF2005 GNSS data processing difference effect |
| url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674984715302238 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT zhanwei effectsofthedifferencesbetweentheitrf2000anditrf2005modelsingnssdataprocessing AT zhushuang effectsofthedifferencesbetweentheitrf2000anditrf2005modelsingnssdataprocessing AT yangbo effectsofthedifferencesbetweentheitrf2000anditrf2005modelsingnssdataprocessing AT wuyanqiang effectsofthedifferencesbetweentheitrf2000anditrf2005modelsingnssdataprocessing AT liuzhiguang effectsofthedifferencesbetweentheitrf2000anditrf2005modelsingnssdataprocessing AT mengxiangang effectsofthedifferencesbetweentheitrf2000anditrf2005modelsingnssdataprocessing |