Urodynamic studies in the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia

OBJECTIVE: We compared the clinical and urodynamic outcome of men with lower urinary tract symptoms with and without previous urodynamic evaluation submitted to transurethral resection of the prostate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective and randomized study was performed in 315 patients who underw...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marcelo L. de Lima, N. Rodrigues Netto Jr.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2003-10-01
Series:International Brazilian Journal of Urology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382003000500005
_version_ 1811263497880731648
author Marcelo L. de Lima
N. Rodrigues Netto Jr.
author_facet Marcelo L. de Lima
N. Rodrigues Netto Jr.
author_sort Marcelo L. de Lima
collection DOAJ
description OBJECTIVE: We compared the clinical and urodynamic outcome of men with lower urinary tract symptoms with and without previous urodynamic evaluation submitted to transurethral resection of the prostate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective and randomized study was performed in 315 patients who underwent transurethral resection of the prostate. In 151 patients (group A) with a mean age of 63 years, transurethral resection of the prostate was performed without a prior urodynamic study, and group B, 164 patients with a mean age of 61 years, underwent a urodynamic study prior to surgical procedure. In group B, only obstructed patients were selected for surgery. All patients had I-PSS higher than 15 and underwent at least 2 uroflowmetry and flow was lower than 10 ml/sec. At 6-month follow up, patients in both groups underwent the I-PSS questionnaire and pressure / flow study. RESULTS: The symptomatology and uroflowmetry did not display different behavior between the groups. The mean postoperative score for group A was 8.87 + 3.27 and for group B was 9.32 + 3.14 (p = 0.22). The mean postoperative uroflow for group A was 17.0 + 2.1 mL/s and for group B was 16.6 + 2.2 mL/s (p = 0.15). Postoperative, in group A, 27 patients (17.8%) were obstructed and in group B, 16 patients (9.75%) were obstructed (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: The study suggests that the previous urodynamic study is not the only factor related to the success of surgical outcome; and therefore, the symptomatology and uroflowmetry associated would be enough during the preoperative routine studies for BPH patients.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T19:46:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3dcf5cf528224d36ba86bf77fecd8d54
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1677-5538
1677-6119
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T19:46:21Z
publishDate 2003-10-01
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
record_format Article
series International Brazilian Journal of Urology
spelling doaj.art-3dcf5cf528224d36ba86bf77fecd8d542022-12-22T03:18:57ZengSociedade Brasileira de UrologiaInternational Brazilian Journal of Urology1677-55381677-61192003-10-0129541842210.1590/S1677-55382003000500005Urodynamic studies in the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasiaMarcelo L. de LimaN. Rodrigues Netto Jr.OBJECTIVE: We compared the clinical and urodynamic outcome of men with lower urinary tract symptoms with and without previous urodynamic evaluation submitted to transurethral resection of the prostate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective and randomized study was performed in 315 patients who underwent transurethral resection of the prostate. In 151 patients (group A) with a mean age of 63 years, transurethral resection of the prostate was performed without a prior urodynamic study, and group B, 164 patients with a mean age of 61 years, underwent a urodynamic study prior to surgical procedure. In group B, only obstructed patients were selected for surgery. All patients had I-PSS higher than 15 and underwent at least 2 uroflowmetry and flow was lower than 10 ml/sec. At 6-month follow up, patients in both groups underwent the I-PSS questionnaire and pressure / flow study. RESULTS: The symptomatology and uroflowmetry did not display different behavior between the groups. The mean postoperative score for group A was 8.87 + 3.27 and for group B was 9.32 + 3.14 (p = 0.22). The mean postoperative uroflow for group A was 17.0 + 2.1 mL/s and for group B was 16.6 + 2.2 mL/s (p = 0.15). Postoperative, in group A, 27 patients (17.8%) were obstructed and in group B, 16 patients (9.75%) were obstructed (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: The study suggests that the previous urodynamic study is not the only factor related to the success of surgical outcome; and therefore, the symptomatology and uroflowmetry associated would be enough during the preoperative routine studies for BPH patients.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382003000500005benign prostatic hyperplasiaurodynamicssymptomstherapeuticsurgery
spellingShingle Marcelo L. de Lima
N. Rodrigues Netto Jr.
Urodynamic studies in the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia
International Brazilian Journal of Urology
benign prostatic hyperplasia
urodynamics
symptoms
therapeutic
surgery
title Urodynamic studies in the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia
title_full Urodynamic studies in the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia
title_fullStr Urodynamic studies in the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia
title_full_unstemmed Urodynamic studies in the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia
title_short Urodynamic studies in the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia
title_sort urodynamic studies in the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia
topic benign prostatic hyperplasia
urodynamics
symptoms
therapeutic
surgery
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382003000500005
work_keys_str_mv AT marceloldelima urodynamicstudiesinthesurgicaltreatmentofbenignprostatichyperplasia
AT nrodriguesnettojr urodynamicstudiesinthesurgicaltreatmentofbenignprostatichyperplasia