Reproducibility of Digital Planning in Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty Among Experienced and Novice Surgeons

Abstract Objective The present study aims to assess the reproducibility of digital planning for cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) among surgeons with different levels of experience. In addition, it attempts to determine the degree of planning reliability based on a contralateral THA or on a s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marcelo Zerbetto Fabricio, Bruno Alves Rudelli, Helder de Souza Miyahara, Leandro Ejnisman, Henrique de Melo Campos Gurgel, Alberto Tesconi Croci
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia 2023-08-01
Series:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162023000200246&tlng=en
_version_ 1797328304721625088
author Marcelo Zerbetto Fabricio
Bruno Alves Rudelli
Helder de Souza Miyahara
Leandro Ejnisman
Henrique de Melo Campos Gurgel
Alberto Tesconi Croci
author_facet Marcelo Zerbetto Fabricio
Bruno Alves Rudelli
Helder de Souza Miyahara
Leandro Ejnisman
Henrique de Melo Campos Gurgel
Alberto Tesconi Croci
author_sort Marcelo Zerbetto Fabricio
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective The present study aims to assess the reproducibility of digital planning for cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) among surgeons with different levels of experience. In addition, it attempts to determine the degree of planning reliability based on a contralateral THA or on a spherical marker positioned at the greater trochanter for calibration. Methods Two evaluators with different experience levels (A1 and A2) performed independently the retrospective digital surgical planning of 64 cementless THAs. Next, we compared the planning with the implants used in the surgery. The reproducibility was excellent when planning and implants were identical; proper in case of a single-unit variation; and inappropriate if there was variation in two or more units. The present analysis also determined the calibration accuracy between the contralateral THA and the spherical marker at the greater trochanter level. Results The present study demonstrated greater success when the most experienced evaluator performed the planning and greater accuracy for the contralateral THA. When splitting the analysis per parameter (contralateral THA or spherical marker), there was a statistical difference only for the planning of A1 and the implants used in the surgery. This difference occurred in the excellent category, with 67.3% for contralateral THA compared with 30.6% for a spherical marker (p < 0.001), and in the inappropriate category, with 7.1% for contralateral THA compared with 30.6% for a spherical marker (p < 0.001). Conclusions Digital planning is more accurate when performed by an experienced evaluator. The contralateral prosthesis head was a better reference than a marker on the greater trochanter.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T06:49:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3dd77f471ce146f1ab095d1b70479903
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1982-4378
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T06:49:54Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
record_format Article
series Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia
spelling doaj.art-3dd77f471ce146f1ab095d1b704799032024-02-03T07:09:24ZengSociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e TraumatologiaRevista Brasileira de Ortopedia1982-43782023-08-0158224625110.1055/s-0042-1750758Reproducibility of Digital Planning in Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty Among Experienced and Novice SurgeonsMarcelo Zerbetto Fabriciohttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8812-5964Bruno Alves Rudellihttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0780-6811Helder de Souza Miyaharahttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2532-2685Leandro Ejnismanhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9866-1960Henrique de Melo Campos Gurgelhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2005-0553Alberto Tesconi Crocihttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3047-2757Abstract Objective The present study aims to assess the reproducibility of digital planning for cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) among surgeons with different levels of experience. In addition, it attempts to determine the degree of planning reliability based on a contralateral THA or on a spherical marker positioned at the greater trochanter for calibration. Methods Two evaluators with different experience levels (A1 and A2) performed independently the retrospective digital surgical planning of 64 cementless THAs. Next, we compared the planning with the implants used in the surgery. The reproducibility was excellent when planning and implants were identical; proper in case of a single-unit variation; and inappropriate if there was variation in two or more units. The present analysis also determined the calibration accuracy between the contralateral THA and the spherical marker at the greater trochanter level. Results The present study demonstrated greater success when the most experienced evaluator performed the planning and greater accuracy for the contralateral THA. When splitting the analysis per parameter (contralateral THA or spherical marker), there was a statistical difference only for the planning of A1 and the implants used in the surgery. This difference occurred in the excellent category, with 67.3% for contralateral THA compared with 30.6% for a spherical marker (p < 0.001), and in the inappropriate category, with 7.1% for contralateral THA compared with 30.6% for a spherical marker (p < 0.001). Conclusions Digital planning is more accurate when performed by an experienced evaluator. The contralateral prosthesis head was a better reference than a marker on the greater trochanter.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162023000200246&tlng=enarthroplasty, replacement, hiphip prosthesisdigital planningpatient care planningradiography
spellingShingle Marcelo Zerbetto Fabricio
Bruno Alves Rudelli
Helder de Souza Miyahara
Leandro Ejnisman
Henrique de Melo Campos Gurgel
Alberto Tesconi Croci
Reproducibility of Digital Planning in Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty Among Experienced and Novice Surgeons
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia
arthroplasty, replacement, hip
hip prosthesis
digital planning
patient care planning
radiography
title Reproducibility of Digital Planning in Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty Among Experienced and Novice Surgeons
title_full Reproducibility of Digital Planning in Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty Among Experienced and Novice Surgeons
title_fullStr Reproducibility of Digital Planning in Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty Among Experienced and Novice Surgeons
title_full_unstemmed Reproducibility of Digital Planning in Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty Among Experienced and Novice Surgeons
title_short Reproducibility of Digital Planning in Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty Among Experienced and Novice Surgeons
title_sort reproducibility of digital planning in cementless total hip arthroplasty among experienced and novice surgeons
topic arthroplasty, replacement, hip
hip prosthesis
digital planning
patient care planning
radiography
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162023000200246&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT marcelozerbettofabricio reproducibilityofdigitalplanningincementlesstotalhiparthroplastyamongexperiencedandnovicesurgeons
AT brunoalvesrudelli reproducibilityofdigitalplanningincementlesstotalhiparthroplastyamongexperiencedandnovicesurgeons
AT helderdesouzamiyahara reproducibilityofdigitalplanningincementlesstotalhiparthroplastyamongexperiencedandnovicesurgeons
AT leandroejnisman reproducibilityofdigitalplanningincementlesstotalhiparthroplastyamongexperiencedandnovicesurgeons
AT henriquedemelocamposgurgel reproducibilityofdigitalplanningincementlesstotalhiparthroplastyamongexperiencedandnovicesurgeons
AT albertotesconicroci reproducibilityofdigitalplanningincementlesstotalhiparthroplastyamongexperiencedandnovicesurgeons