Experiential Learning: Critical Analysis of Standardized Patient and Disability Simulation

Current revisions to the accreditation standards for occupational therapy (OT) education include proposed changes to experiential learning. The AOTA Fieldwork/Experiential Learning Ad Hoc Committee recommends that fieldwork Level I experiences be replaced with a new model of experiential education t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laura VanPuymbrouck, Jenna L. Heffron, Alisa Jordan Sheth, Kim J. The, Danbi Lee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Eastern Kentucky University 2017-01-01
Series:Journal of Occupational Therapy Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.26681/jote.2017.010305
_version_ 1828856340407123968
author Laura VanPuymbrouck
Jenna L. Heffron
Alisa Jordan Sheth
Kim J. The
Danbi Lee
author_facet Laura VanPuymbrouck
Jenna L. Heffron
Alisa Jordan Sheth
Kim J. The
Danbi Lee
author_sort Laura VanPuymbrouck
collection DOAJ
description Current revisions to the accreditation standards for occupational therapy (OT) education include proposed changes to experiential learning. The AOTA Fieldwork/Experiential Learning Ad Hoc Committee recommends that fieldwork Level I experiences be replaced with a new model of experiential education that includes the use of standardized patients and simulation (AOTA, 2017). The purpose of this article is to present critical perspectives about standardized patient simulation and disability simulation to support informed decision-making about the integration of experiential learning in OT professional education. In standardized patient simulation, actors play the roles of clients and important others in therapeutic scenarios; in disability simulation, students act out impairments in a variety of settings. While these forms of simulation are commonly used within OT education, they are critiqued for failing to present participants with authentic lived experiences of disability. This paper presents alternative approaches that would more fully align the OT curriculum with perspectives and priorities of intersectional disability communities. Recommendations to be considered by educators and educational programs include becoming familiar with relevant literature across fields and communities; developing long-term partnerships with disability organizations and community members; involving people with disabilities in the development, implementation, and evaluation of experiential learning opportunities; and providing experiential learning opportunities that take place outside educational and clinical settings and that attend to multiple intersecting dimensions of people with disabilities’ lived experiences. Together, these recommendations can help ensure that students have access to evidence-based educational approaches and best practices that accurately reflect the self-identified needs, concerns, and priorities of intersectional disability communities.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T01:13:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3ddb2d9261ab43eeb85bf9a077cca8fb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2573-1378
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T01:13:44Z
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Eastern Kentucky University
record_format Article
series Journal of Occupational Therapy Education
spelling doaj.art-3ddb2d9261ab43eeb85bf9a077cca8fb2022-12-22T00:04:23ZengEastern Kentucky UniversityJournal of Occupational Therapy Education2573-13782017-01-011310.26681/jote.2017.010305Experiential Learning: Critical Analysis of Standardized Patient and Disability SimulationLaura VanPuymbrouck0Jenna L. Heffron1Alisa Jordan Sheth2Kim J. The3Danbi Lee4University of Illinois at ChicagoIthaca CollegeUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoNorthwestern UniversityCurrent revisions to the accreditation standards for occupational therapy (OT) education include proposed changes to experiential learning. The AOTA Fieldwork/Experiential Learning Ad Hoc Committee recommends that fieldwork Level I experiences be replaced with a new model of experiential education that includes the use of standardized patients and simulation (AOTA, 2017). The purpose of this article is to present critical perspectives about standardized patient simulation and disability simulation to support informed decision-making about the integration of experiential learning in OT professional education. In standardized patient simulation, actors play the roles of clients and important others in therapeutic scenarios; in disability simulation, students act out impairments in a variety of settings. While these forms of simulation are commonly used within OT education, they are critiqued for failing to present participants with authentic lived experiences of disability. This paper presents alternative approaches that would more fully align the OT curriculum with perspectives and priorities of intersectional disability communities. Recommendations to be considered by educators and educational programs include becoming familiar with relevant literature across fields and communities; developing long-term partnerships with disability organizations and community members; involving people with disabilities in the development, implementation, and evaluation of experiential learning opportunities; and providing experiential learning opportunities that take place outside educational and clinical settings and that attend to multiple intersecting dimensions of people with disabilities’ lived experiences. Together, these recommendations can help ensure that students have access to evidence-based educational approaches and best practices that accurately reflect the self-identified needs, concerns, and priorities of intersectional disability communities.https://doi.org/10.26681/jote.2017.010305Experiential learningprofessional educationsimulationpeople with disabilitieslived experience
spellingShingle Laura VanPuymbrouck
Jenna L. Heffron
Alisa Jordan Sheth
Kim J. The
Danbi Lee
Experiential Learning: Critical Analysis of Standardized Patient and Disability Simulation
Journal of Occupational Therapy Education
Experiential learning
professional education
simulation
people with disabilities
lived experience
title Experiential Learning: Critical Analysis of Standardized Patient and Disability Simulation
title_full Experiential Learning: Critical Analysis of Standardized Patient and Disability Simulation
title_fullStr Experiential Learning: Critical Analysis of Standardized Patient and Disability Simulation
title_full_unstemmed Experiential Learning: Critical Analysis of Standardized Patient and Disability Simulation
title_short Experiential Learning: Critical Analysis of Standardized Patient and Disability Simulation
title_sort experiential learning critical analysis of standardized patient and disability simulation
topic Experiential learning
professional education
simulation
people with disabilities
lived experience
url https://doi.org/10.26681/jote.2017.010305
work_keys_str_mv AT lauravanpuymbrouck experientiallearningcriticalanalysisofstandardizedpatientanddisabilitysimulation
AT jennalheffron experientiallearningcriticalanalysisofstandardizedpatientanddisabilitysimulation
AT alisajordansheth experientiallearningcriticalanalysisofstandardizedpatientanddisabilitysimulation
AT kimjthe experientiallearningcriticalanalysisofstandardizedpatientanddisabilitysimulation
AT danbilee experientiallearningcriticalanalysisofstandardizedpatientanddisabilitysimulation