Predictors of aneurysm shrinkage after flow diversion treatment for internal carotid artery aneurysms: quantitative volume analysis with MRI

Background and purposeAlthough aneurysm shrinkage often occurs after flow diversion treatment for intracranial aneurysms, no reports have addressed the factors associated with aneurysm shrinkage.Materials and methodsThis retrospective single-center study was performed to examine patients with unrupt...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ryo Akiyama, Akira Ishii, Takayuki Kikuchi, Masakazu Okawa, Yukihiro Yamao, Yu Abekura, Isao Ono, Natsuhi Sasaki, Hirofumi Tsuji, So Matsukawa, Susumu Miyamoto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-12-01
Series:Frontiers in Neurology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2023.1266460/full
_version_ 1797384204040798208
author Ryo Akiyama
Akira Ishii
Takayuki Kikuchi
Masakazu Okawa
Yukihiro Yamao
Yu Abekura
Isao Ono
Isao Ono
Natsuhi Sasaki
Hirofumi Tsuji
So Matsukawa
Susumu Miyamoto
author_facet Ryo Akiyama
Akira Ishii
Takayuki Kikuchi
Masakazu Okawa
Yukihiro Yamao
Yu Abekura
Isao Ono
Isao Ono
Natsuhi Sasaki
Hirofumi Tsuji
So Matsukawa
Susumu Miyamoto
author_sort Ryo Akiyama
collection DOAJ
description Background and purposeAlthough aneurysm shrinkage often occurs after flow diversion treatment for intracranial aneurysms, no reports have addressed the factors associated with aneurysm shrinkage.Materials and methodsThis retrospective single-center study was performed to examine patients with unruptured internal carotid artery aneurysms who were treated using flow diversion and followed up by imaging for at least 12 months. The study outcome was aneurysm shrinkage (volume reduction of ≥10%) 12 months after treatment. Aneurysm volume was quantitatively assessed using the MRIcroGL software. Patient and aneurysm characteristics were statistically analyzed.ResultsThis study involved 81 patients with 88 aneurysms. At the 6 months, 12 months, and last follow-ups, the proportion of aneurysms that had shrunk was 50, 64, and 65%, respectively. No adjunctive coiling (odds ratio, 56.7; 95% confidence interval, 7.03–457.21; p < 0.001) and aneurysm occlusion (odds ratio, 90.7; 95% confidence interval, 8.32–988.66; p < 0.001) were significantly associated with aneurysm shrinkage. In patients treated by flow diversion with adjunctive coiling, only the volume embolization rate was a factor significantly associated with aneurysm shrinkage (p < 0.001). Its cutoff value was 15.5% according to the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (area under the curve, 0.87; sensitivity, 0.87; specificity, 0.83).ConclusionThe rate of aneurysm shrinkage after flow diversion increased during the first 12 months after treatment, but not thereafter. No adjunctive coiling and aneurysm occlusion were predictors of aneurysm shrinkage, respectively. If adjunctive coiling is required, a volume embolization rate of ≤15.5% may be suggested for aneurysm regression.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T21:33:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3de7187fbc9b4a40af490f9c8e2980b3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-2295
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T21:33:00Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Neurology
spelling doaj.art-3de7187fbc9b4a40af490f9c8e2980b32023-12-21T04:49:49ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neurology1664-22952023-12-011410.3389/fneur.2023.12664601266460Predictors of aneurysm shrinkage after flow diversion treatment for internal carotid artery aneurysms: quantitative volume analysis with MRIRyo Akiyama0Akira Ishii1Takayuki Kikuchi2Masakazu Okawa3Yukihiro Yamao4Yu Abekura5Isao Ono6Isao Ono7Natsuhi Sasaki8Hirofumi Tsuji9So Matsukawa10Susumu Miyamoto11Department of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, JapanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, JapanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, JapanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, JapanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, JapanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, JapanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, JapanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hikone Municipal Hospital, Hikone, JapanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, JapanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, JapanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, JapanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, JapanBackground and purposeAlthough aneurysm shrinkage often occurs after flow diversion treatment for intracranial aneurysms, no reports have addressed the factors associated with aneurysm shrinkage.Materials and methodsThis retrospective single-center study was performed to examine patients with unruptured internal carotid artery aneurysms who were treated using flow diversion and followed up by imaging for at least 12 months. The study outcome was aneurysm shrinkage (volume reduction of ≥10%) 12 months after treatment. Aneurysm volume was quantitatively assessed using the MRIcroGL software. Patient and aneurysm characteristics were statistically analyzed.ResultsThis study involved 81 patients with 88 aneurysms. At the 6 months, 12 months, and last follow-ups, the proportion of aneurysms that had shrunk was 50, 64, and 65%, respectively. No adjunctive coiling (odds ratio, 56.7; 95% confidence interval, 7.03–457.21; p < 0.001) and aneurysm occlusion (odds ratio, 90.7; 95% confidence interval, 8.32–988.66; p < 0.001) were significantly associated with aneurysm shrinkage. In patients treated by flow diversion with adjunctive coiling, only the volume embolization rate was a factor significantly associated with aneurysm shrinkage (p < 0.001). Its cutoff value was 15.5% according to the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (area under the curve, 0.87; sensitivity, 0.87; specificity, 0.83).ConclusionThe rate of aneurysm shrinkage after flow diversion increased during the first 12 months after treatment, but not thereafter. No adjunctive coiling and aneurysm occlusion were predictors of aneurysm shrinkage, respectively. If adjunctive coiling is required, a volume embolization rate of ≤15.5% may be suggested for aneurysm regression.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2023.1266460/fullflow diversionaneurysmshrinkageMRIvolume analysis
spellingShingle Ryo Akiyama
Akira Ishii
Takayuki Kikuchi
Masakazu Okawa
Yukihiro Yamao
Yu Abekura
Isao Ono
Isao Ono
Natsuhi Sasaki
Hirofumi Tsuji
So Matsukawa
Susumu Miyamoto
Predictors of aneurysm shrinkage after flow diversion treatment for internal carotid artery aneurysms: quantitative volume analysis with MRI
Frontiers in Neurology
flow diversion
aneurysm
shrinkage
MRI
volume analysis
title Predictors of aneurysm shrinkage after flow diversion treatment for internal carotid artery aneurysms: quantitative volume analysis with MRI
title_full Predictors of aneurysm shrinkage after flow diversion treatment for internal carotid artery aneurysms: quantitative volume analysis with MRI
title_fullStr Predictors of aneurysm shrinkage after flow diversion treatment for internal carotid artery aneurysms: quantitative volume analysis with MRI
title_full_unstemmed Predictors of aneurysm shrinkage after flow diversion treatment for internal carotid artery aneurysms: quantitative volume analysis with MRI
title_short Predictors of aneurysm shrinkage after flow diversion treatment for internal carotid artery aneurysms: quantitative volume analysis with MRI
title_sort predictors of aneurysm shrinkage after flow diversion treatment for internal carotid artery aneurysms quantitative volume analysis with mri
topic flow diversion
aneurysm
shrinkage
MRI
volume analysis
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2023.1266460/full
work_keys_str_mv AT ryoakiyama predictorsofaneurysmshrinkageafterflowdiversiontreatmentforinternalcarotidarteryaneurysmsquantitativevolumeanalysiswithmri
AT akiraishii predictorsofaneurysmshrinkageafterflowdiversiontreatmentforinternalcarotidarteryaneurysmsquantitativevolumeanalysiswithmri
AT takayukikikuchi predictorsofaneurysmshrinkageafterflowdiversiontreatmentforinternalcarotidarteryaneurysmsquantitativevolumeanalysiswithmri
AT masakazuokawa predictorsofaneurysmshrinkageafterflowdiversiontreatmentforinternalcarotidarteryaneurysmsquantitativevolumeanalysiswithmri
AT yukihiroyamao predictorsofaneurysmshrinkageafterflowdiversiontreatmentforinternalcarotidarteryaneurysmsquantitativevolumeanalysiswithmri
AT yuabekura predictorsofaneurysmshrinkageafterflowdiversiontreatmentforinternalcarotidarteryaneurysmsquantitativevolumeanalysiswithmri
AT isaoono predictorsofaneurysmshrinkageafterflowdiversiontreatmentforinternalcarotidarteryaneurysmsquantitativevolumeanalysiswithmri
AT isaoono predictorsofaneurysmshrinkageafterflowdiversiontreatmentforinternalcarotidarteryaneurysmsquantitativevolumeanalysiswithmri
AT natsuhisasaki predictorsofaneurysmshrinkageafterflowdiversiontreatmentforinternalcarotidarteryaneurysmsquantitativevolumeanalysiswithmri
AT hirofumitsuji predictorsofaneurysmshrinkageafterflowdiversiontreatmentforinternalcarotidarteryaneurysmsquantitativevolumeanalysiswithmri
AT somatsukawa predictorsofaneurysmshrinkageafterflowdiversiontreatmentforinternalcarotidarteryaneurysmsquantitativevolumeanalysiswithmri
AT susumumiyamoto predictorsofaneurysmshrinkageafterflowdiversiontreatmentforinternalcarotidarteryaneurysmsquantitativevolumeanalysiswithmri