Comparison of three techniques in the surgical management of metastatic vertebral fracture with posterior wall damage: a retrospective study

Abstract Background To retrospectively compare the safety and efficacy of percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP), internal fixation (IF), and kyphoplasty combined with internal fixation (KP + IF) in treating metastatic vertebral fracture (MVF) with posterior wall damage. Methods 87 patients with MVF with po...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Heng Wang, Jile Xie, Yijie Liu, Guangdong Chen, Weimin Jiang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-02-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03608-9
_version_ 1827983244041125888
author Heng Wang
Jile Xie
Yijie Liu
Guangdong Chen
Weimin Jiang
author_facet Heng Wang
Jile Xie
Yijie Liu
Guangdong Chen
Weimin Jiang
author_sort Heng Wang
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background To retrospectively compare the safety and efficacy of percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP), internal fixation (IF), and kyphoplasty combined with internal fixation (KP + IF) in treating metastatic vertebral fracture (MVF) with posterior wall damage. Methods 87 patients with MVF with posterior wall damage underwent surgery. In Group PKP, 36 patients underwent PKP; in Group IF, 20 patients underwent pedicle screw fixation; and in Group KP + IF, 31 patients underwent kyphoplasty combined with pedicle screw fixation. Operative time, intraoperative blood loss, clinical and radiological results, and complication rate in each group were evaluated and compared. Results Significant improvement on the VAS, ODI scores, vertebral height and local kyphotic angle (LKA) was noted in each group (P < 0.001). Group PKP and Group KP + IF achieved better pain relief than Group IF (P < 0.05). At postoperative 3 days, Group PKP had better pain relief than Group KP + IF (P < 0.05). At other follow-up time points, there were no differences between Group PKP and KP + IF (P > 0.05). Group KP + IF and Group IF were more efficacious than Group PKP in terms of height restoration and LKA correction (P < 0.05). Group KP + IF had a higher incidence of postoperative complications than Group PKP and Group IF(P < 0.05). Conclusions PKP was safe and effective in treating MVF with posterior wall damage. It can achieve similar clinical outcomes compared to KP + IF, but associated with less operative time, less blood loss and fewer complications. IF alone should not be the first treatment option for its poorer analgesic effect.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T22:45:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3df0ce2fbc4145b7a89f87808bee4565
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1749-799X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T22:45:42Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
spelling doaj.art-3df0ce2fbc4145b7a89f87808bee45652023-03-22T11:51:18ZengBMCJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research1749-799X2023-02-011811810.1186/s13018-023-03608-9Comparison of three techniques in the surgical management of metastatic vertebral fracture with posterior wall damage: a retrospective studyHeng Wang0Jile Xie1Yijie Liu2Guangdong Chen3Weimin Jiang4Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow UniversityDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow UniversityDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow UniversityDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow UniversityDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow UniversityAbstract Background To retrospectively compare the safety and efficacy of percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP), internal fixation (IF), and kyphoplasty combined with internal fixation (KP + IF) in treating metastatic vertebral fracture (MVF) with posterior wall damage. Methods 87 patients with MVF with posterior wall damage underwent surgery. In Group PKP, 36 patients underwent PKP; in Group IF, 20 patients underwent pedicle screw fixation; and in Group KP + IF, 31 patients underwent kyphoplasty combined with pedicle screw fixation. Operative time, intraoperative blood loss, clinical and radiological results, and complication rate in each group were evaluated and compared. Results Significant improvement on the VAS, ODI scores, vertebral height and local kyphotic angle (LKA) was noted in each group (P < 0.001). Group PKP and Group KP + IF achieved better pain relief than Group IF (P < 0.05). At postoperative 3 days, Group PKP had better pain relief than Group KP + IF (P < 0.05). At other follow-up time points, there were no differences between Group PKP and KP + IF (P > 0.05). Group KP + IF and Group IF were more efficacious than Group PKP in terms of height restoration and LKA correction (P < 0.05). Group KP + IF had a higher incidence of postoperative complications than Group PKP and Group IF(P < 0.05). Conclusions PKP was safe and effective in treating MVF with posterior wall damage. It can achieve similar clinical outcomes compared to KP + IF, but associated with less operative time, less blood loss and fewer complications. IF alone should not be the first treatment option for its poorer analgesic effect.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03608-9KyphoplastySpinal metastasesSpineVertebral fracturePedicle screw fixation
spellingShingle Heng Wang
Jile Xie
Yijie Liu
Guangdong Chen
Weimin Jiang
Comparison of three techniques in the surgical management of metastatic vertebral fracture with posterior wall damage: a retrospective study
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Kyphoplasty
Spinal metastases
Spine
Vertebral fracture
Pedicle screw fixation
title Comparison of three techniques in the surgical management of metastatic vertebral fracture with posterior wall damage: a retrospective study
title_full Comparison of three techniques in the surgical management of metastatic vertebral fracture with posterior wall damage: a retrospective study
title_fullStr Comparison of three techniques in the surgical management of metastatic vertebral fracture with posterior wall damage: a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of three techniques in the surgical management of metastatic vertebral fracture with posterior wall damage: a retrospective study
title_short Comparison of three techniques in the surgical management of metastatic vertebral fracture with posterior wall damage: a retrospective study
title_sort comparison of three techniques in the surgical management of metastatic vertebral fracture with posterior wall damage a retrospective study
topic Kyphoplasty
Spinal metastases
Spine
Vertebral fracture
Pedicle screw fixation
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03608-9
work_keys_str_mv AT hengwang comparisonofthreetechniquesinthesurgicalmanagementofmetastaticvertebralfracturewithposteriorwalldamagearetrospectivestudy
AT jilexie comparisonofthreetechniquesinthesurgicalmanagementofmetastaticvertebralfracturewithposteriorwalldamagearetrospectivestudy
AT yijieliu comparisonofthreetechniquesinthesurgicalmanagementofmetastaticvertebralfracturewithposteriorwalldamagearetrospectivestudy
AT guangdongchen comparisonofthreetechniquesinthesurgicalmanagementofmetastaticvertebralfracturewithposteriorwalldamagearetrospectivestudy
AT weiminjiang comparisonofthreetechniquesinthesurgicalmanagementofmetastaticvertebralfracturewithposteriorwalldamagearetrospectivestudy