Incidence, clinical course, and risk factors in the development of femoral pseudoaneurysm after atrial fibrillation ablation

Abstract Background Previous studies have revealed the risk factors for femoral pseudoaneurysms (FPA). Most data on FPA are based on coronary and peripheral interventions, with limited studies focusing on atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. However, patient backgrounds, anticoagulation regimens, and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Takafumi Koyama, Kazuki Tobita, Tatsuto Kawaguchi, Shuhei Uchida, Eiji Koyama, Nobuhisa Kodera, Yusuke Tamaki, Yuri Otomaru, Hirokazu Miyashita, Takayoshi Yamashita, Shingo Mizuno, Masato Murakami, Shigeru Saito
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-12-01
Series:Journal of Arrhythmia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12950
_version_ 1797429073340792832
author Takafumi Koyama
Kazuki Tobita
Tatsuto Kawaguchi
Shuhei Uchida
Eiji Koyama
Nobuhisa Kodera
Yusuke Tamaki
Yuri Otomaru
Hirokazu Miyashita
Takayoshi Yamashita
Shingo Mizuno
Masato Murakami
Shigeru Saito
author_facet Takafumi Koyama
Kazuki Tobita
Tatsuto Kawaguchi
Shuhei Uchida
Eiji Koyama
Nobuhisa Kodera
Yusuke Tamaki
Yuri Otomaru
Hirokazu Miyashita
Takayoshi Yamashita
Shingo Mizuno
Masato Murakami
Shigeru Saito
author_sort Takafumi Koyama
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Previous studies have revealed the risk factors for femoral pseudoaneurysms (FPA). Most data on FPA are based on coronary and peripheral interventions, with limited studies focusing on atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. However, patient backgrounds, anticoagulation regimens, and vascular access methods differ. In addition, a standard for managing FPA after AF ablation remains elusive due to the difficult nature of achieving thrombosis in pseudoaneurysms. Methods This single‐center, retrospective, observational study included 2805 consecutive patients who underwent AF ablation between January 2016 and December 2021. All patients underwent femoral artery and vein punctures. Puncture sites were checked 1 day post‐procedure. Results A total of 23 FPA patients were identified during the study period. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that hypertension (odds ratio 4.66, 95% confidence interval: 1.38–15.71; p = .0032) and warfarin use (odds ratio 3.83, 95% confidence interval: 1.40–10.45; p = .021) were significantly associated with the occurrence of FPA. The compression success rate was low (22%). There were nine and six patients in the endovascular treatment (EVT) and ultrasound‐guided thrombin injection (UGTI) groups, respectively. The success rates were 100% and 84% in the EVT and UGTI groups, respectively. The length of hospital stay after FPA treatment was 2.1 days in the EVT group and 1.3 days in the thrombin group. Conclusion We must be careful about post‐procedural FPA, especially for hypertension and warfarin‐using patients. Treatment of pseudoaneurysms with anticoagulants is unlikely to achieve hemostasis, and an early switch to invasive treatments, such as EVT, should be considered.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T09:07:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3df2e6549e3a49638ba752cbcb93d9ae
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1880-4276
1883-2148
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T09:07:55Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Arrhythmia
spelling doaj.art-3df2e6549e3a49638ba752cbcb93d9ae2023-12-02T09:34:11ZengWileyJournal of Arrhythmia1880-42761883-21482023-12-0139689490010.1002/joa3.12950Incidence, clinical course, and risk factors in the development of femoral pseudoaneurysm after atrial fibrillation ablationTakafumi Koyama0Kazuki Tobita1Tatsuto Kawaguchi2Shuhei Uchida3Eiji Koyama4Nobuhisa Kodera5Yusuke Tamaki6Yuri Otomaru7Hirokazu Miyashita8Takayoshi Yamashita9Shingo Mizuno10Masato Murakami11Shigeru Saito12Department of Cardiology Shonan Kamakura General Hospital Kamakura JapanDepartment of Cardiology Shonan Kamakura General Hospital Kamakura JapanDepartment of Cardiology Shonan Kamakura General Hospital Kamakura JapanDepartment of Cardiology Shonan Kamakura General Hospital Kamakura JapanDepartment of Cardiology Shonan Kamakura General Hospital Kamakura JapanDepartment of Cardiology Shonan Kamakura General Hospital Kamakura JapanDepartment of Cardiology Shonan Kamakura General Hospital Kamakura JapanDepartment of Cardiology Shonan Kamakura General Hospital Kamakura JapanDepartment of Cardiology Shonan Kamakura General Hospital Kamakura JapanDepartment of Cardiology Shonan Kamakura General Hospital Kamakura JapanDepartment of Cardiology Shonan Kamakura General Hospital Kamakura JapanDepartment of Cardiology Shonan Kamakura General Hospital Kamakura JapanDepartment of Cardiology Shonan Kamakura General Hospital Kamakura JapanAbstract Background Previous studies have revealed the risk factors for femoral pseudoaneurysms (FPA). Most data on FPA are based on coronary and peripheral interventions, with limited studies focusing on atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. However, patient backgrounds, anticoagulation regimens, and vascular access methods differ. In addition, a standard for managing FPA after AF ablation remains elusive due to the difficult nature of achieving thrombosis in pseudoaneurysms. Methods This single‐center, retrospective, observational study included 2805 consecutive patients who underwent AF ablation between January 2016 and December 2021. All patients underwent femoral artery and vein punctures. Puncture sites were checked 1 day post‐procedure. Results A total of 23 FPA patients were identified during the study period. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that hypertension (odds ratio 4.66, 95% confidence interval: 1.38–15.71; p = .0032) and warfarin use (odds ratio 3.83, 95% confidence interval: 1.40–10.45; p = .021) were significantly associated with the occurrence of FPA. The compression success rate was low (22%). There were nine and six patients in the endovascular treatment (EVT) and ultrasound‐guided thrombin injection (UGTI) groups, respectively. The success rates were 100% and 84% in the EVT and UGTI groups, respectively. The length of hospital stay after FPA treatment was 2.1 days in the EVT group and 1.3 days in the thrombin group. Conclusion We must be careful about post‐procedural FPA, especially for hypertension and warfarin‐using patients. Treatment of pseudoaneurysms with anticoagulants is unlikely to achieve hemostasis, and an early switch to invasive treatments, such as EVT, should be considered.https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12950aneurysm false*/etiologyatrial fibrillationcatheter ablation/adverse effects*thrombin*
spellingShingle Takafumi Koyama
Kazuki Tobita
Tatsuto Kawaguchi
Shuhei Uchida
Eiji Koyama
Nobuhisa Kodera
Yusuke Tamaki
Yuri Otomaru
Hirokazu Miyashita
Takayoshi Yamashita
Shingo Mizuno
Masato Murakami
Shigeru Saito
Incidence, clinical course, and risk factors in the development of femoral pseudoaneurysm after atrial fibrillation ablation
Journal of Arrhythmia
aneurysm false*/etiology
atrial fibrillation
catheter ablation/adverse effects*
thrombin*
title Incidence, clinical course, and risk factors in the development of femoral pseudoaneurysm after atrial fibrillation ablation
title_full Incidence, clinical course, and risk factors in the development of femoral pseudoaneurysm after atrial fibrillation ablation
title_fullStr Incidence, clinical course, and risk factors in the development of femoral pseudoaneurysm after atrial fibrillation ablation
title_full_unstemmed Incidence, clinical course, and risk factors in the development of femoral pseudoaneurysm after atrial fibrillation ablation
title_short Incidence, clinical course, and risk factors in the development of femoral pseudoaneurysm after atrial fibrillation ablation
title_sort incidence clinical course and risk factors in the development of femoral pseudoaneurysm after atrial fibrillation ablation
topic aneurysm false*/etiology
atrial fibrillation
catheter ablation/adverse effects*
thrombin*
url https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12950
work_keys_str_mv AT takafumikoyama incidenceclinicalcourseandriskfactorsinthedevelopmentoffemoralpseudoaneurysmafteratrialfibrillationablation
AT kazukitobita incidenceclinicalcourseandriskfactorsinthedevelopmentoffemoralpseudoaneurysmafteratrialfibrillationablation
AT tatsutokawaguchi incidenceclinicalcourseandriskfactorsinthedevelopmentoffemoralpseudoaneurysmafteratrialfibrillationablation
AT shuheiuchida incidenceclinicalcourseandriskfactorsinthedevelopmentoffemoralpseudoaneurysmafteratrialfibrillationablation
AT eijikoyama incidenceclinicalcourseandriskfactorsinthedevelopmentoffemoralpseudoaneurysmafteratrialfibrillationablation
AT nobuhisakodera incidenceclinicalcourseandriskfactorsinthedevelopmentoffemoralpseudoaneurysmafteratrialfibrillationablation
AT yusuketamaki incidenceclinicalcourseandriskfactorsinthedevelopmentoffemoralpseudoaneurysmafteratrialfibrillationablation
AT yuriotomaru incidenceclinicalcourseandriskfactorsinthedevelopmentoffemoralpseudoaneurysmafteratrialfibrillationablation
AT hirokazumiyashita incidenceclinicalcourseandriskfactorsinthedevelopmentoffemoralpseudoaneurysmafteratrialfibrillationablation
AT takayoshiyamashita incidenceclinicalcourseandriskfactorsinthedevelopmentoffemoralpseudoaneurysmafteratrialfibrillationablation
AT shingomizuno incidenceclinicalcourseandriskfactorsinthedevelopmentoffemoralpseudoaneurysmafteratrialfibrillationablation
AT masatomurakami incidenceclinicalcourseandriskfactorsinthedevelopmentoffemoralpseudoaneurysmafteratrialfibrillationablation
AT shigerusaito incidenceclinicalcourseandriskfactorsinthedevelopmentoffemoralpseudoaneurysmafteratrialfibrillationablation