Dupilumab in prurigo nodularis: a systematic review of current evidence and analysis of predictive factors to response

Introduction Dupilumab has been shown effective for prurigo nodularis (PN). However, precise data about efficacy of dupilumab as off-label use in PN is missing. We aggregated current evidence to assess efficacy of dupilumab in PN and to identify possible response predictors Material and methods Five...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Husein Husein-ElAhmed, Martin Steinhoff
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2022-04-01
Series:Journal of Dermatological Treatment
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2020.1853024
_version_ 1797683551939854336
author Husein Husein-ElAhmed
Martin Steinhoff
author_facet Husein Husein-ElAhmed
Martin Steinhoff
author_sort Husein Husein-ElAhmed
collection DOAJ
description Introduction Dupilumab has been shown effective for prurigo nodularis (PN). However, precise data about efficacy of dupilumab as off-label use in PN is missing. We aggregated current evidence to assess efficacy of dupilumab in PN and to identify possible response predictors Material and methods Five electronic databases were searched. Our primary outcome was improvement in pruritus measured by numerical rating scale (NRS). We collected data on NRS before (NRSpre) and after (NRSpost) the dupilumab therapy and designed two categorical variables: ‘NRS_50’ and ‘NRS_100’ defined as whether one patient reaches 50% and 100% reduction of the NRSpre. Secondary outcomes included: time until patient perceived any improvement (Time_First) and time until patient reported absence of pruritus (Time_Final). Results Data on 45 patients from eleven articles were analyzed. The NRSpre was 8.58 ± 1.89 and the NRSpost was 1.78 ± 2.29. Time_First was 10.15 ± 10.56 weeks, while Time_Final was 19.28 ± 13.71 weeks. 22/45 patients (48.88%) presented with complete resolution (NRS_100) and 37/45 patients (82.22%) had itch half dropped (NRS_50). Time_First was significantly longer in subjects that did not reach NRS_100 (13.13 ± 13.77) than in subjects that did (7.34 ± 7.86, p= .05). Time_First was significantly longer in atopic dermatitis (AD) patients (16.08 ± 16.18) than in subjects without AD (7.02 ± 5.69, p=.01). NRS_50 and NRS_100 presented with a significant association (p=.05) Conclusion Dupilumab is an effective target-to-treat agent. In comparison with AD, the clinical response to dupilumab initiates later and, two months of therapy are required until significant itch relieves. Complete remission is rarely observed before 4 months of therapy. Notably, AD-related PN patients need longer treatment than non-AD related PN patients to find any relief. Two early signs of improvement are promising predictors of response to dupilumab: The Time_First and NRS_50. What's already known about this topic?Dupilumab has been shown to be an efficacious treatment for prurigo nodularis (PN) However, literature data on this topic are scattered. What does this study add? This work presents the largest cohort of PN patients treated with dupilumab. Our findings demonstrate dupilumab is a novel and effective choice In comparison with atopic dermatitis, the clinical response to dupilumab initiates later. Two months of therapy are required until the itch relieves. Complete remission is rarely observed before 4 months of therapy. Atopic dermatitis-related PN patients need more weeks of treatment than non-atopic dermatitis-related PN patients
first_indexed 2024-03-12T00:15:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3e032a4ba7ec4a6fb3b4aef8b4ce5990
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0954-6634
1471-1753
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T00:15:49Z
publishDate 2022-04-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Journal of Dermatological Treatment
spelling doaj.art-3e032a4ba7ec4a6fb3b4aef8b4ce59902023-09-15T14:28:49ZengTaylor & Francis GroupJournal of Dermatological Treatment0954-66341471-17532022-04-013331547155310.1080/09546634.2020.18530241853024Dupilumab in prurigo nodularis: a systematic review of current evidence and analysis of predictive factors to responseHusein Husein-ElAhmed0Martin Steinhoff1Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Hospital de BazaHamad Medical Corporation, Translational Research InstituteIntroduction Dupilumab has been shown effective for prurigo nodularis (PN). However, precise data about efficacy of dupilumab as off-label use in PN is missing. We aggregated current evidence to assess efficacy of dupilumab in PN and to identify possible response predictors Material and methods Five electronic databases were searched. Our primary outcome was improvement in pruritus measured by numerical rating scale (NRS). We collected data on NRS before (NRSpre) and after (NRSpost) the dupilumab therapy and designed two categorical variables: ‘NRS_50’ and ‘NRS_100’ defined as whether one patient reaches 50% and 100% reduction of the NRSpre. Secondary outcomes included: time until patient perceived any improvement (Time_First) and time until patient reported absence of pruritus (Time_Final). Results Data on 45 patients from eleven articles were analyzed. The NRSpre was 8.58 ± 1.89 and the NRSpost was 1.78 ± 2.29. Time_First was 10.15 ± 10.56 weeks, while Time_Final was 19.28 ± 13.71 weeks. 22/45 patients (48.88%) presented with complete resolution (NRS_100) and 37/45 patients (82.22%) had itch half dropped (NRS_50). Time_First was significantly longer in subjects that did not reach NRS_100 (13.13 ± 13.77) than in subjects that did (7.34 ± 7.86, p= .05). Time_First was significantly longer in atopic dermatitis (AD) patients (16.08 ± 16.18) than in subjects without AD (7.02 ± 5.69, p=.01). NRS_50 and NRS_100 presented with a significant association (p=.05) Conclusion Dupilumab is an effective target-to-treat agent. In comparison with AD, the clinical response to dupilumab initiates later and, two months of therapy are required until significant itch relieves. Complete remission is rarely observed before 4 months of therapy. Notably, AD-related PN patients need longer treatment than non-AD related PN patients to find any relief. Two early signs of improvement are promising predictors of response to dupilumab: The Time_First and NRS_50. What's already known about this topic?Dupilumab has been shown to be an efficacious treatment for prurigo nodularis (PN) However, literature data on this topic are scattered. What does this study add? This work presents the largest cohort of PN patients treated with dupilumab. Our findings demonstrate dupilumab is a novel and effective choice In comparison with atopic dermatitis, the clinical response to dupilumab initiates later. Two months of therapy are required until the itch relieves. Complete remission is rarely observed before 4 months of therapy. Atopic dermatitis-related PN patients need more weeks of treatment than non-atopic dermatitis-related PN patientshttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2020.1853024biologicprurigo nodularisatopic dermatitisitchefficacymeta-analysis
spellingShingle Husein Husein-ElAhmed
Martin Steinhoff
Dupilumab in prurigo nodularis: a systematic review of current evidence and analysis of predictive factors to response
Journal of Dermatological Treatment
biologic
prurigo nodularis
atopic dermatitis
itch
efficacy
meta-analysis
title Dupilumab in prurigo nodularis: a systematic review of current evidence and analysis of predictive factors to response
title_full Dupilumab in prurigo nodularis: a systematic review of current evidence and analysis of predictive factors to response
title_fullStr Dupilumab in prurigo nodularis: a systematic review of current evidence and analysis of predictive factors to response
title_full_unstemmed Dupilumab in prurigo nodularis: a systematic review of current evidence and analysis of predictive factors to response
title_short Dupilumab in prurigo nodularis: a systematic review of current evidence and analysis of predictive factors to response
title_sort dupilumab in prurigo nodularis a systematic review of current evidence and analysis of predictive factors to response
topic biologic
prurigo nodularis
atopic dermatitis
itch
efficacy
meta-analysis
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2020.1853024
work_keys_str_mv AT huseinhuseinelahmed dupilumabinprurigonodularisasystematicreviewofcurrentevidenceandanalysisofpredictivefactorstoresponse
AT martinsteinhoff dupilumabinprurigonodularisasystematicreviewofcurrentevidenceandanalysisofpredictivefactorstoresponse