Nutrition training in residency and fellowship programme: time for a change

Background: Despite several measures, the nutrition education during undergraduate and postgraduate training has been identified to be suboptimal. The objective of this study was to assess the nutrition knowledge, attitudes and practice of residents, fellows and teaching faculties, following a refor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ravishankar Asokkumar, Ennaliza Salazar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2020-06-01
Series:Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2010105820903746
_version_ 1798045901562839040
author Ravishankar Asokkumar
Ennaliza Salazar
author_facet Ravishankar Asokkumar
Ennaliza Salazar
author_sort Ravishankar Asokkumar
collection DOAJ
description Background: Despite several measures, the nutrition education during undergraduate and postgraduate training has been identified to be suboptimal. The objective of this study was to assess the nutrition knowledge, attitudes and practice of residents, fellows and teaching faculties, following a reformation in the training curriculum, in a tertiary teaching hospital. Method: We conducted an anonymous survey involving residents, fellows and teaching faculties in medical and surgical speciality. We assessed four domains: (a) recognition, (b) knowledge, (c) application of basic principles of nutritional and (d) attitude towards clinical nutrition during residency and fellowship training. Each domain had five multiple choice questions and the attitude section was assessed using a five-point Likert scale. Result: We distributed the survey to 305 doctors: 265 completed the first three domains and 259 completed all the domains. The overall mean ± SD score between residents (6.5 ± 1.9), fellows (6.8 ± 1.8) and teaching faculties (6.5 ± 2.2) was similar. All scored similarly in the recognition, knowledge and application domain of the questionnaire. When subcategorised, the gastroenterology sub-speciality scored significantly higher than the rest (8.1 ± 2.2 vs. 6.4 ± 1.9, p = 0.001). Sixty-three per cent and 44% of the responders felt there was lack of adequate focus on clinical nutrition training in residency and during daily ward round, respectively. Only 10% of responders felt confident in providing nutritional counselling and treatment for malnourished patients. Conclusion: Our study shows the current nutritional education during residency and fellowship training is still inadequate and falls short in achieving the recommended goals.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T23:28:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3e0f3f68776e41d792383c31b65ff701
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2010-1058
2059-2329
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T23:28:36Z
publishDate 2020-06-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare
spelling doaj.art-3e0f3f68776e41d792383c31b65ff7012022-12-22T03:57:14ZengSAGE PublishingProceedings of Singapore Healthcare2010-10582059-23292020-06-012910.1177/2010105820903746Nutrition training in residency and fellowship programme: time for a changeRavishankar AsokkumarEnnaliza SalazarBackground: Despite several measures, the nutrition education during undergraduate and postgraduate training has been identified to be suboptimal. The objective of this study was to assess the nutrition knowledge, attitudes and practice of residents, fellows and teaching faculties, following a reformation in the training curriculum, in a tertiary teaching hospital. Method: We conducted an anonymous survey involving residents, fellows and teaching faculties in medical and surgical speciality. We assessed four domains: (a) recognition, (b) knowledge, (c) application of basic principles of nutritional and (d) attitude towards clinical nutrition during residency and fellowship training. Each domain had five multiple choice questions and the attitude section was assessed using a five-point Likert scale. Result: We distributed the survey to 305 doctors: 265 completed the first three domains and 259 completed all the domains. The overall mean ± SD score between residents (6.5 ± 1.9), fellows (6.8 ± 1.8) and teaching faculties (6.5 ± 2.2) was similar. All scored similarly in the recognition, knowledge and application domain of the questionnaire. When subcategorised, the gastroenterology sub-speciality scored significantly higher than the rest (8.1 ± 2.2 vs. 6.4 ± 1.9, p = 0.001). Sixty-three per cent and 44% of the responders felt there was lack of adequate focus on clinical nutrition training in residency and during daily ward round, respectively. Only 10% of responders felt confident in providing nutritional counselling and treatment for malnourished patients. Conclusion: Our study shows the current nutritional education during residency and fellowship training is still inadequate and falls short in achieving the recommended goals.https://doi.org/10.1177/2010105820903746
spellingShingle Ravishankar Asokkumar
Ennaliza Salazar
Nutrition training in residency and fellowship programme: time for a change
Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare
title Nutrition training in residency and fellowship programme: time for a change
title_full Nutrition training in residency and fellowship programme: time for a change
title_fullStr Nutrition training in residency and fellowship programme: time for a change
title_full_unstemmed Nutrition training in residency and fellowship programme: time for a change
title_short Nutrition training in residency and fellowship programme: time for a change
title_sort nutrition training in residency and fellowship programme time for a change
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2010105820903746
work_keys_str_mv AT ravishankarasokkumar nutritiontraininginresidencyandfellowshipprogrammetimeforachange
AT ennalizasalazar nutritiontraininginresidencyandfellowshipprogrammetimeforachange