The Role of Textual vs. Compound Input Enhancement in Developing Grammar Ability

The present study investigated comparatively the impact of two types of input enhancement (i.e. textual vs. compound enhancement) on developing grammar ability in Iranian EFL setting. Sixty-five female secondary high school students were selected as a homogenous sample out of about a 100-member popu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gholam-Reza Abbasian, Nazilsa Yekani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Allameh Tabataba'i University Press 2014-06-01
Series:Issues in Language Teaching
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ilt.atu.ac.ir/article_1372_928dff04273b1c33d6059d57f186b8ea.pdf
_version_ 1797378238497947648
author Gholam-Reza Abbasian
Nazilsa Yekani
author_facet Gholam-Reza Abbasian
Nazilsa Yekani
author_sort Gholam-Reza Abbasian
collection DOAJ
description The present study investigated comparatively the impact of two types of input enhancement (i.e. textual vs. compound enhancement) on developing grammar ability in Iranian EFL setting. Sixty-five female secondary high school students were selected as a homogenous sample out of about a 100-member population based on Nelson language proficiency test. Then, their grammar ability was measured based on a researcher-made diagnostic test prior to the experiment. The sample was randomly divided into two equal groups; one group received text-enhancement-based instruction of grammar, while the other received compound-based enhancement. Finally, they received an achievement test of grammar as a posttest to measure their progress in light of two different types of input enhancement mechanisms. The pertinent statistical analyses of the results indicated that a) the effect of textual enhancement-based instruction of grammar is not significantly meaningful, while b) the compound enhancement-based instruction has significant effect on learning grammatical structures. Comparatively speaking, therefore, c) compound enhancement-based instruction of grammar is more significantly effective than that of textual in developing grammar ability. It can be safely concluded that grammar instruction and its resultant development are subject to intervention type, which, pedagogically, bears promising messages for both teachers and syllabus designers to incorporate parameters of input enhancement in both teaching and materials development, respectively.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T20:03:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3e1c0a39e813452e8908ab991071f94a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2322-3715
2476-6194
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T20:03:51Z
publishDate 2014-06-01
publisher Allameh Tabataba'i University Press
record_format Article
series Issues in Language Teaching
spelling doaj.art-3e1c0a39e813452e8908ab991071f94a2023-12-23T10:46:18ZengAllameh Tabataba'i University PressIssues in Language Teaching2322-37152476-61942014-06-01311341131372The Role of Textual vs. Compound Input Enhancement in Developing Grammar AbilityGholam-Reza Abbasian0Nazilsa Yekani1Assistant Professor of TEFL, Imam Ali University & Islamic Azad University, South Tehran Branch, IranM.A. in TEFL, Islamic Azad University, Takestan Branch, IranThe present study investigated comparatively the impact of two types of input enhancement (i.e. textual vs. compound enhancement) on developing grammar ability in Iranian EFL setting. Sixty-five female secondary high school students were selected as a homogenous sample out of about a 100-member population based on Nelson language proficiency test. Then, their grammar ability was measured based on a researcher-made diagnostic test prior to the experiment. The sample was randomly divided into two equal groups; one group received text-enhancement-based instruction of grammar, while the other received compound-based enhancement. Finally, they received an achievement test of grammar as a posttest to measure their progress in light of two different types of input enhancement mechanisms. The pertinent statistical analyses of the results indicated that a) the effect of textual enhancement-based instruction of grammar is not significantly meaningful, while b) the compound enhancement-based instruction has significant effect on learning grammatical structures. Comparatively speaking, therefore, c) compound enhancement-based instruction of grammar is more significantly effective than that of textual in developing grammar ability. It can be safely concluded that grammar instruction and its resultant development are subject to intervention type, which, pedagogically, bears promising messages for both teachers and syllabus designers to incorporate parameters of input enhancement in both teaching and materials development, respectively.https://ilt.atu.ac.ir/article_1372_928dff04273b1c33d6059d57f186b8ea.pdfinput enhancementfeedbacktextual enhancementcompound enhancement
spellingShingle Gholam-Reza Abbasian
Nazilsa Yekani
The Role of Textual vs. Compound Input Enhancement in Developing Grammar Ability
Issues in Language Teaching
input enhancement
feedback
textual enhancement
compound enhancement
title The Role of Textual vs. Compound Input Enhancement in Developing Grammar Ability
title_full The Role of Textual vs. Compound Input Enhancement in Developing Grammar Ability
title_fullStr The Role of Textual vs. Compound Input Enhancement in Developing Grammar Ability
title_full_unstemmed The Role of Textual vs. Compound Input Enhancement in Developing Grammar Ability
title_short The Role of Textual vs. Compound Input Enhancement in Developing Grammar Ability
title_sort role of textual vs compound input enhancement in developing grammar ability
topic input enhancement
feedback
textual enhancement
compound enhancement
url https://ilt.atu.ac.ir/article_1372_928dff04273b1c33d6059d57f186b8ea.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT gholamrezaabbasian theroleoftextualvscompoundinputenhancementindevelopinggrammarability
AT nazilsayekani theroleoftextualvscompoundinputenhancementindevelopinggrammarability
AT gholamrezaabbasian roleoftextualvscompoundinputenhancementindevelopinggrammarability
AT nazilsayekani roleoftextualvscompoundinputenhancementindevelopinggrammarability