Comparison of Microleakage of a Self-adhesive Composite with a Conventional Flowable Composite and Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement in Class V Restorations
Introduction: Self-adhering flowable composite resins were recently introduced to combine the merits of both adhesive and restorative technologies in one product. This study aimed to evaluate the microleakage of a self-adhering flowable composite in comparison with a conventional flowable composite...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
2022-12-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Dental Materials and Techniques |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://jdmt.mums.ac.ir/article_21569_ecd9284a5aec71ee1ad19592eebb3ca1.pdf |
| _version_ | 1797951369692315648 |
|---|---|
| author | Maryam Mofidi Razieh Hoseinifar Fahime Shahrokhi Mina Soltanianzadeh |
| author_facet | Maryam Mofidi Razieh Hoseinifar Fahime Shahrokhi Mina Soltanianzadeh |
| author_sort | Maryam Mofidi |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Introduction: Self-adhering flowable composite resins were recently introduced to combine the merits of both adhesive and restorative technologies in one product. This study aimed to evaluate the microleakage of a self-adhering flowable composite in comparison with a conventional flowable composite and resin-modified glass ionomer cement in class V cavities. Methods: In this in vitro experimental study, class V cavities were prepared in the buccal and lingual surfaces of 20 sound human molars (40 cavities). The cavities were randomly divided into 4 groups (n=10) and restored with Vertise Flow self-adhering flowable composite in group A, Premise conventional flowable composite in group B, etched with 37% phosphoric acid and restored with OptiBond Solo Plus + Vertise Flow in group C, and Fuji II LC glass ionomer in group D. The specimens were thermocycled for 1000 cycles (5-55°C), immersed in 0.5% basic fuchsine dye solution for 24 h, sectioned, and observed under a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed by SPSS software using the Kruskal-Wallis, Npar, and Wilcoxon signed rank tests (alpha=0.05). Results: The Kruskal-Wallis test showed that the degree of microleakage was not significantly different among different groups at the enamel margin (P=161) or the dentin margin (P=467). The Wilcoxon signed rank test revealed that the difference in microleakage between the dentin and enamel margins was significant within all four groups (P<0.05). Conclusion: The microleakage of self-adhesive composite, self-adhesive composite with separate etching and bonding, flowable composite, and glass ionomer cement was the same at both dentin and enamel margins. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-10T22:29:30Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-3e27393c2e5f4ca7ab5d60e8021c0490 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2322-4150 2252-0317 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-10T22:29:30Z |
| publishDate | 2022-12-01 |
| publisher | Mashhad University of Medical Sciences |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Dental Materials and Techniques |
| spelling | doaj.art-3e27393c2e5f4ca7ab5d60e8021c04902023-01-17T07:06:01ZengMashhad University of Medical SciencesJournal of Dental Materials and Techniques2322-41502252-03172022-12-0111424925610.22038/jdmt.2022.66939.152921569Comparison of Microleakage of a Self-adhesive Composite with a Conventional Flowable Composite and Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement in Class V RestorationsMaryam Mofidi0Razieh Hoseinifar1Fahime Shahrokhi2Mina Soltanianzadeh3Assistant Professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, IranAssistant Professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, IranOperative Dental Specialist, Private PracticeAssistant Professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, IranIntroduction: Self-adhering flowable composite resins were recently introduced to combine the merits of both adhesive and restorative technologies in one product. This study aimed to evaluate the microleakage of a self-adhering flowable composite in comparison with a conventional flowable composite and resin-modified glass ionomer cement in class V cavities. Methods: In this in vitro experimental study, class V cavities were prepared in the buccal and lingual surfaces of 20 sound human molars (40 cavities). The cavities were randomly divided into 4 groups (n=10) and restored with Vertise Flow self-adhering flowable composite in group A, Premise conventional flowable composite in group B, etched with 37% phosphoric acid and restored with OptiBond Solo Plus + Vertise Flow in group C, and Fuji II LC glass ionomer in group D. The specimens were thermocycled for 1000 cycles (5-55°C), immersed in 0.5% basic fuchsine dye solution for 24 h, sectioned, and observed under a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed by SPSS software using the Kruskal-Wallis, Npar, and Wilcoxon signed rank tests (alpha=0.05). Results: The Kruskal-Wallis test showed that the degree of microleakage was not significantly different among different groups at the enamel margin (P=161) or the dentin margin (P=467). The Wilcoxon signed rank test revealed that the difference in microleakage between the dentin and enamel margins was significant within all four groups (P<0.05). Conclusion: The microleakage of self-adhesive composite, self-adhesive composite with separate etching and bonding, flowable composite, and glass ionomer cement was the same at both dentin and enamel margins.https://jdmt.mums.ac.ir/article_21569_ecd9284a5aec71ee1ad19592eebb3ca1.pdfdentin adhesiondental leakageenamel adhesionresin-composite |
| spellingShingle | Maryam Mofidi Razieh Hoseinifar Fahime Shahrokhi Mina Soltanianzadeh Comparison of Microleakage of a Self-adhesive Composite with a Conventional Flowable Composite and Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement in Class V Restorations Journal of Dental Materials and Techniques dentin adhesion dental leakage enamel adhesion resin-composite |
| title | Comparison of Microleakage of a Self-adhesive Composite with a Conventional Flowable Composite and Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement in Class V Restorations |
| title_full | Comparison of Microleakage of a Self-adhesive Composite with a Conventional Flowable Composite and Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement in Class V Restorations |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of Microleakage of a Self-adhesive Composite with a Conventional Flowable Composite and Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement in Class V Restorations |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Microleakage of a Self-adhesive Composite with a Conventional Flowable Composite and Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement in Class V Restorations |
| title_short | Comparison of Microleakage of a Self-adhesive Composite with a Conventional Flowable Composite and Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement in Class V Restorations |
| title_sort | comparison of microleakage of a self adhesive composite with a conventional flowable composite and resin modified glass ionomer cement in class v restorations |
| topic | dentin adhesion dental leakage enamel adhesion resin-composite |
| url | https://jdmt.mums.ac.ir/article_21569_ecd9284a5aec71ee1ad19592eebb3ca1.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT maryammofidi comparisonofmicroleakageofaselfadhesivecompositewithaconventionalflowablecompositeandresinmodifiedglassionomercementinclassvrestorations AT raziehhoseinifar comparisonofmicroleakageofaselfadhesivecompositewithaconventionalflowablecompositeandresinmodifiedglassionomercementinclassvrestorations AT fahimeshahrokhi comparisonofmicroleakageofaselfadhesivecompositewithaconventionalflowablecompositeandresinmodifiedglassionomercementinclassvrestorations AT minasoltanianzadeh comparisonofmicroleakageofaselfadhesivecompositewithaconventionalflowablecompositeandresinmodifiedglassionomercementinclassvrestorations |