At the Limits of Species: D.H. Lawrence’s Critical Anthropomorphism in “Fish”
A more empathic inclusion of non-human beings within our human universe can improve the conditions of coexistence between humans and non-humans. In this regard, the effort to understand the lives of non-human agents participates in the development of ecological consciousness. Lawrence could play a r...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Presses Universitaires de Paris Nanterre
2021-12-01
|
| Series: | Études Lawrenciennes |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://journals.openedition.org/lawrence/2805 |
| _version_ | 1811190461854908416 |
|---|---|
| author | Benjamin Bouche |
| author_facet | Benjamin Bouche |
| author_sort | Benjamin Bouche |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | A more empathic inclusion of non-human beings within our human universe can improve the conditions of coexistence between humans and non-humans. In this regard, the effort to understand the lives of non-human agents participates in the development of ecological consciousness. Lawrence could play a role here, through the remarkable quality of what he writes about non-human animals. In “Fish,” he manages to offer a poetic rendering of the sensitive existence of fish, doing so in an astonishing way. But the same poem also points to the impossibility of adequately describing life forms as remote from our conditions of living as is the case for fish. Lawrence seems to be admitting to the impossibility of what, at the same time, the poem is performing, in a manner that is surprisingly effective. This “contradiction” can be regarded as a model of “critical anthropomorphism,” accounting for both proximity and distance, anthropomorphism and dehumanization, offering to the reader the poem as both an enterprise in perspective-taking and an awareness of its limits. A conclusion to be drawn could be that the most appropriate relation towards non-human agents would be the merging of two quite different components: both an effort to understand and a skepticism about the very possibility of any true understanding of what non-humans really are. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-11T14:51:31Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-3e2c6f01366242bc9e9e1c4506f94a41 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0994-5490 2272-4001 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-11T14:51:31Z |
| publishDate | 2021-12-01 |
| publisher | Presses Universitaires de Paris Nanterre |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Études Lawrenciennes |
| spelling | doaj.art-3e2c6f01366242bc9e9e1c4506f94a412022-12-22T04:17:26ZengPresses Universitaires de Paris NanterreÉtudes Lawrenciennes0994-54902272-40012021-12-015310.4000/lawrence.2805At the Limits of Species: D.H. Lawrence’s Critical Anthropomorphism in “Fish”Benjamin BoucheA more empathic inclusion of non-human beings within our human universe can improve the conditions of coexistence between humans and non-humans. In this regard, the effort to understand the lives of non-human agents participates in the development of ecological consciousness. Lawrence could play a role here, through the remarkable quality of what he writes about non-human animals. In “Fish,” he manages to offer a poetic rendering of the sensitive existence of fish, doing so in an astonishing way. But the same poem also points to the impossibility of adequately describing life forms as remote from our conditions of living as is the case for fish. Lawrence seems to be admitting to the impossibility of what, at the same time, the poem is performing, in a manner that is surprisingly effective. This “contradiction” can be regarded as a model of “critical anthropomorphism,” accounting for both proximity and distance, anthropomorphism and dehumanization, offering to the reader the poem as both an enterprise in perspective-taking and an awareness of its limits. A conclusion to be drawn could be that the most appropriate relation towards non-human agents would be the merging of two quite different components: both an effort to understand and a skepticism about the very possibility of any true understanding of what non-humans really are.http://journals.openedition.org/lawrence/2805ecological consciousnessfishnon-humansothernessunderstandingillusion |
| spellingShingle | Benjamin Bouche At the Limits of Species: D.H. Lawrence’s Critical Anthropomorphism in “Fish” Études Lawrenciennes ecological consciousness fish non-humans otherness understanding illusion |
| title | At the Limits of Species: D.H. Lawrence’s Critical Anthropomorphism in “Fish” |
| title_full | At the Limits of Species: D.H. Lawrence’s Critical Anthropomorphism in “Fish” |
| title_fullStr | At the Limits of Species: D.H. Lawrence’s Critical Anthropomorphism in “Fish” |
| title_full_unstemmed | At the Limits of Species: D.H. Lawrence’s Critical Anthropomorphism in “Fish” |
| title_short | At the Limits of Species: D.H. Lawrence’s Critical Anthropomorphism in “Fish” |
| title_sort | at the limits of species d h lawrence s critical anthropomorphism in fish |
| topic | ecological consciousness fish non-humans otherness understanding illusion |
| url | http://journals.openedition.org/lawrence/2805 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT benjaminbouche atthelimitsofspeciesdhlawrencescriticalanthropomorphisminfish |