Application of triple evaluation method in predicting the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer

Abstract Objective To analyze the factors related to the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer and find appropriate evaluation methods for evaluating the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy Methods A total of 143 patients with breast cancer treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy at Baotou Cance...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xu Han, Hui Li, Sha-Sha Dong, Shui-Ying Zhou, Cai-Hong Wang, Lin Guo, Jie Yang, Gang-Ling Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-03-01
Series:World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-02998-8
_version_ 1797853773409812480
author Xu Han
Hui Li
Sha-Sha Dong
Shui-Ying Zhou
Cai-Hong Wang
Lin Guo
Jie Yang
Gang-Ling Zhang
author_facet Xu Han
Hui Li
Sha-Sha Dong
Shui-Ying Zhou
Cai-Hong Wang
Lin Guo
Jie Yang
Gang-Ling Zhang
author_sort Xu Han
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective To analyze the factors related to the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer and find appropriate evaluation methods for evaluating the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy Methods A total of 143 patients with breast cancer treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy at Baotou Cancer Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The chemotherapy regimen was mainly paclitaxel combined with carboplatin for 1 week, docetaxel combined with carboplatin for 3 weeks, and was replaced with epirubicin combined with cyclophosphamide after evaluation of disease progression. All HER2-positive patients were treated with simultaneous targeted therapy, including trastuzumab single-target therapy and trastuzumab combined with pertuzumab double-target therapy. Combined with physical examination, color Doppler ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), a systematic evaluation system was initially established—the “triple evaluation method.” A baseline evaluation was conducted before treatment. The efficacy was evaluated by physical examination and color Doppler every cycle, and the efficacy was evaluated by physical examination, color Doppler, and MRI every two cycles. Results The increase in ultrasonic blood flow after treatment could affect the efficacy of monitoring. The presence of two preoperative time–signal intensity curves is a therapeutically effective protective factor for inflow. The triple evaluation determined by physical examination, color Doppler ultrasound, and MRI in determining clinical efficacy is consistent with the effectiveness of the pathological gold standard. Conclusion The therapeutic effect of neoadjuvant therapy can be better evaluated by combining clinical physical examination, color ultrasound, and nuclear magnetic resonance evaluation. The three methods complement each other to avoid the insufficient evaluation of a single method, which is convenient for most prefecty-level hospitals. Additionally, this method is simple, feasible, and suitable for promotion.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T19:55:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3e3afa43fbfa4741bca4934e009614fc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1477-7819
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T19:55:04Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series World Journal of Surgical Oncology
spelling doaj.art-3e3afa43fbfa4741bca4934e009614fc2023-04-03T05:29:25ZengBMCWorld Journal of Surgical Oncology1477-78192023-03-012111910.1186/s12957-023-02998-8Application of triple evaluation method in predicting the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancerXu Han0Hui Li1Sha-Sha Dong2Shui-Ying Zhou3Cai-Hong Wang4Lin Guo5Jie Yang6Gang-Ling Zhang7Department of Breast Surgery, Baotou Cancer HospitalDepartment of Breast Surgery, Baotou Cancer HospitalDepartment of Breast Surgery, Baotou Cancer HospitalDepartment of Breast Surgery, Baotou Cancer HospitalDepartment of Operating Room, Baotou Cancer HospitalDepartment of Breast Surgery, Baotou Cancer HospitalDepartment of Breast Surgery, Baotou Cancer HospitalDepartment of Breast Surgery, Baotou Cancer HospitalAbstract Objective To analyze the factors related to the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer and find appropriate evaluation methods for evaluating the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy Methods A total of 143 patients with breast cancer treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy at Baotou Cancer Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The chemotherapy regimen was mainly paclitaxel combined with carboplatin for 1 week, docetaxel combined with carboplatin for 3 weeks, and was replaced with epirubicin combined with cyclophosphamide after evaluation of disease progression. All HER2-positive patients were treated with simultaneous targeted therapy, including trastuzumab single-target therapy and trastuzumab combined with pertuzumab double-target therapy. Combined with physical examination, color Doppler ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), a systematic evaluation system was initially established—the “triple evaluation method.” A baseline evaluation was conducted before treatment. The efficacy was evaluated by physical examination and color Doppler every cycle, and the efficacy was evaluated by physical examination, color Doppler, and MRI every two cycles. Results The increase in ultrasonic blood flow after treatment could affect the efficacy of monitoring. The presence of two preoperative time–signal intensity curves is a therapeutically effective protective factor for inflow. The triple evaluation determined by physical examination, color Doppler ultrasound, and MRI in determining clinical efficacy is consistent with the effectiveness of the pathological gold standard. Conclusion The therapeutic effect of neoadjuvant therapy can be better evaluated by combining clinical physical examination, color ultrasound, and nuclear magnetic resonance evaluation. The three methods complement each other to avoid the insufficient evaluation of a single method, which is convenient for most prefecty-level hospitals. Additionally, this method is simple, feasible, and suitable for promotion.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-02998-8Breast cancerNeoadjuvant therapyTriple evaluation methodPhysical examinationColor Doppler ultrasoundMagnetic resonance imaging
spellingShingle Xu Han
Hui Li
Sha-Sha Dong
Shui-Ying Zhou
Cai-Hong Wang
Lin Guo
Jie Yang
Gang-Ling Zhang
Application of triple evaluation method in predicting the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer
World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Breast cancer
Neoadjuvant therapy
Triple evaluation method
Physical examination
Color Doppler ultrasound
Magnetic resonance imaging
title Application of triple evaluation method in predicting the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer
title_full Application of triple evaluation method in predicting the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer
title_fullStr Application of triple evaluation method in predicting the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed Application of triple evaluation method in predicting the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer
title_short Application of triple evaluation method in predicting the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer
title_sort application of triple evaluation method in predicting the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer
topic Breast cancer
Neoadjuvant therapy
Triple evaluation method
Physical examination
Color Doppler ultrasound
Magnetic resonance imaging
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-02998-8
work_keys_str_mv AT xuhan applicationoftripleevaluationmethodinpredictingtheefficacyofneoadjuvanttherapyforbreastcancer
AT huili applicationoftripleevaluationmethodinpredictingtheefficacyofneoadjuvanttherapyforbreastcancer
AT shashadong applicationoftripleevaluationmethodinpredictingtheefficacyofneoadjuvanttherapyforbreastcancer
AT shuiyingzhou applicationoftripleevaluationmethodinpredictingtheefficacyofneoadjuvanttherapyforbreastcancer
AT caihongwang applicationoftripleevaluationmethodinpredictingtheefficacyofneoadjuvanttherapyforbreastcancer
AT linguo applicationoftripleevaluationmethodinpredictingtheefficacyofneoadjuvanttherapyforbreastcancer
AT jieyang applicationoftripleevaluationmethodinpredictingtheefficacyofneoadjuvanttherapyforbreastcancer
AT ganglingzhang applicationoftripleevaluationmethodinpredictingtheefficacyofneoadjuvanttherapyforbreastcancer