Chlamydia and gonorrhoea in pregnant Batswana women: time to discard the syndromic approach?

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Chlamydia and gonorrhoea are major causes of morbidity among women in developing countries. Both infections have been associated with pregnancy-related complications, and case detection and treatment in pregnancy is essential. In cou...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Klouman Elise, Rahman Mafizur, Velauthapillai Manonmany, Sundby Johanne, Romoren Maria, Hjortdahl Per
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2007-04-01
Series:BMC Infectious Diseases
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/7/27
_version_ 1811280770417819648
author Klouman Elise
Rahman Mafizur
Velauthapillai Manonmany
Sundby Johanne
Romoren Maria
Hjortdahl Per
author_facet Klouman Elise
Rahman Mafizur
Velauthapillai Manonmany
Sundby Johanne
Romoren Maria
Hjortdahl Per
author_sort Klouman Elise
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Chlamydia and gonorrhoea are major causes of morbidity among women in developing countries. Both infections have been associated with pregnancy-related complications, and case detection and treatment in pregnancy is essential. In countries without laboratory support, the diagnosis and treatment of cervical infections is based on the syndromic approach. In this study we measured the prevalence of chlamydia and gonorrhoea among antenatal care attendees in Botswana. We evaluated the syndromic approach for the detection of cervical infections in pregnancy, and determined if risk scores could improve the diagnostic accuracy.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>In a cross-sectional study, 703 antenatal care attendees in Botswana were interviewed and examined, and specimens were collected for the identification of <it>C trachomatis</it>, <it>N gonorrhoeae </it>and other reproductive tract infections. Risk scores to identify attendees with cervical infections were computed based on identified risk factors, and their sensitivities, specificities, likelihood ratios and predictive values were calculated.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The prevalence of chlamydia was 8%, and gonorrhoea was found in 3% of the attendees. Symptoms and signs of vaginal discharge did not predict cervical infection, and a syndromic approach failed to identify infected women. Age (youth) risk factor most strongly associated with cervical infection. A risk score with only sociodemographic factors had likelihood ratios equivalent to risk scores which incorporated clinical signs and microscopy results. However, all the evaluated risk scores were of limited value in the diagnosis of chlamydia and gonorrhoea. A cut-off set at an acceptable sensitivity to avoid infected antenatal care attendees who remained untreated would inevitably lead to considerable over-treatment.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Although in extensive use, the syndromic approach is unsuitable for diagnosing cervical infections in antenatal care attendees in Botswana. None of the evaluated risk scores can replace this management. Without diagnostic tests, there are no adequate management strategies for <it>C trachomatis </it>and <it>N gonorrhoeae </it>in pregnant women in Botswana, a situation which is likely to apply to other countries in sub-Saharan Africa. Screening for cervical infections in pregnant women is an essential public health measure, and rapid tests will hopefully be available in developing countries within a few years.</p>
first_indexed 2024-04-13T01:21:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3e489ee0147d425c80b523d2891423a3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2334
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T01:21:56Z
publishDate 2007-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Infectious Diseases
spelling doaj.art-3e489ee0147d425c80b523d2891423a32022-12-22T03:08:45ZengBMCBMC Infectious Diseases1471-23342007-04-01712710.1186/1471-2334-7-27Chlamydia and gonorrhoea in pregnant Batswana women: time to discard the syndromic approach?Klouman EliseRahman MafizurVelauthapillai ManonmanySundby JohanneRomoren MariaHjortdahl Per<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Chlamydia and gonorrhoea are major causes of morbidity among women in developing countries. Both infections have been associated with pregnancy-related complications, and case detection and treatment in pregnancy is essential. In countries without laboratory support, the diagnosis and treatment of cervical infections is based on the syndromic approach. In this study we measured the prevalence of chlamydia and gonorrhoea among antenatal care attendees in Botswana. We evaluated the syndromic approach for the detection of cervical infections in pregnancy, and determined if risk scores could improve the diagnostic accuracy.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>In a cross-sectional study, 703 antenatal care attendees in Botswana were interviewed and examined, and specimens were collected for the identification of <it>C trachomatis</it>, <it>N gonorrhoeae </it>and other reproductive tract infections. Risk scores to identify attendees with cervical infections were computed based on identified risk factors, and their sensitivities, specificities, likelihood ratios and predictive values were calculated.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The prevalence of chlamydia was 8%, and gonorrhoea was found in 3% of the attendees. Symptoms and signs of vaginal discharge did not predict cervical infection, and a syndromic approach failed to identify infected women. Age (youth) risk factor most strongly associated with cervical infection. A risk score with only sociodemographic factors had likelihood ratios equivalent to risk scores which incorporated clinical signs and microscopy results. However, all the evaluated risk scores were of limited value in the diagnosis of chlamydia and gonorrhoea. A cut-off set at an acceptable sensitivity to avoid infected antenatal care attendees who remained untreated would inevitably lead to considerable over-treatment.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Although in extensive use, the syndromic approach is unsuitable for diagnosing cervical infections in antenatal care attendees in Botswana. None of the evaluated risk scores can replace this management. Without diagnostic tests, there are no adequate management strategies for <it>C trachomatis </it>and <it>N gonorrhoeae </it>in pregnant women in Botswana, a situation which is likely to apply to other countries in sub-Saharan Africa. Screening for cervical infections in pregnant women is an essential public health measure, and rapid tests will hopefully be available in developing countries within a few years.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/7/27
spellingShingle Klouman Elise
Rahman Mafizur
Velauthapillai Manonmany
Sundby Johanne
Romoren Maria
Hjortdahl Per
Chlamydia and gonorrhoea in pregnant Batswana women: time to discard the syndromic approach?
BMC Infectious Diseases
title Chlamydia and gonorrhoea in pregnant Batswana women: time to discard the syndromic approach?
title_full Chlamydia and gonorrhoea in pregnant Batswana women: time to discard the syndromic approach?
title_fullStr Chlamydia and gonorrhoea in pregnant Batswana women: time to discard the syndromic approach?
title_full_unstemmed Chlamydia and gonorrhoea in pregnant Batswana women: time to discard the syndromic approach?
title_short Chlamydia and gonorrhoea in pregnant Batswana women: time to discard the syndromic approach?
title_sort chlamydia and gonorrhoea in pregnant batswana women time to discard the syndromic approach
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/7/27
work_keys_str_mv AT kloumanelise chlamydiaandgonorrhoeainpregnantbatswanawomentimetodiscardthesyndromicapproach
AT rahmanmafizur chlamydiaandgonorrhoeainpregnantbatswanawomentimetodiscardthesyndromicapproach
AT velauthapillaimanonmany chlamydiaandgonorrhoeainpregnantbatswanawomentimetodiscardthesyndromicapproach
AT sundbyjohanne chlamydiaandgonorrhoeainpregnantbatswanawomentimetodiscardthesyndromicapproach
AT romorenmaria chlamydiaandgonorrhoeainpregnantbatswanawomentimetodiscardthesyndromicapproach
AT hjortdahlper chlamydiaandgonorrhoeainpregnantbatswanawomentimetodiscardthesyndromicapproach