IARC 2019: “Night shift work” is probably carcinogenic: What about disturbed chronobiology in all walks of life?

Abstract In June of 2019, a working group convened by the International Agency for Research on Cancer [IARC] concluded that “night shift work” is probably carcinogenic to humans (a Group 2A carcinogen). This was based on sufficient evidence of cancer and strong mechanistic evidence in experimental a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thomas C. Erren, Peter Morfeld, J. Valérie Groß, Ursula Wild, Philip Lewis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-11-01
Series:Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12995-019-0249-6
_version_ 1798024339727056896
author Thomas C. Erren
Peter Morfeld
J. Valérie Groß
Ursula Wild
Philip Lewis
author_facet Thomas C. Erren
Peter Morfeld
J. Valérie Groß
Ursula Wild
Philip Lewis
author_sort Thomas C. Erren
collection DOAJ
description Abstract In June of 2019, a working group convened by the International Agency for Research on Cancer [IARC] concluded that “night shift work” is probably carcinogenic to humans (a Group 2A carcinogen). This was based on sufficient evidence of cancer and strong mechanistic evidence in experimental animals and limited evidence from human epidemiological studies. The biological basis from experimental work is clear and compelling: Disturbed chronobiology such as due to alterations in the light-dark schedule which shift-workers experience is associated with carcinogenicity. But is it correct to assume in epidemiological studies that “night shift work” provides the same dose of disturbed chronobiology to all night workers and that disturbed chronobiology from activities outside of work does not count? Both chronobiological theory and supporting evidence suggest that much-needed future epidemiology should address these questions and should consider disturbed chronobiology in all walks of life.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T18:00:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3e54625b99394e4093d8a9e11729cdcd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1745-6673
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T18:00:48Z
publishDate 2019-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
spelling doaj.art-3e54625b99394e4093d8a9e11729cdcd2022-12-22T04:10:29ZengBMCJournal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology1745-66732019-11-011411310.1186/s12995-019-0249-6IARC 2019: “Night shift work” is probably carcinogenic: What about disturbed chronobiology in all walks of life?Thomas C. Erren0Peter MorfeldJ. Valérie Groß1Ursula Wild2Philip Lewis3Institute and Policlinic for Occupational Medicine, Environmental Medicine and Prevention Research, University Hospital of CologneInstitute and Policlinic for Occupational Medicine, Environmental Medicine and Prevention Research, University Hospital of CologneInstitute and Policlinic for Occupational Medicine, Environmental Medicine and Prevention Research, University Hospital of CologneInstitute and Policlinic for Occupational Medicine, Environmental Medicine and Prevention Research, University Hospital of CologneAbstract In June of 2019, a working group convened by the International Agency for Research on Cancer [IARC] concluded that “night shift work” is probably carcinogenic to humans (a Group 2A carcinogen). This was based on sufficient evidence of cancer and strong mechanistic evidence in experimental animals and limited evidence from human epidemiological studies. The biological basis from experimental work is clear and compelling: Disturbed chronobiology such as due to alterations in the light-dark schedule which shift-workers experience is associated with carcinogenicity. But is it correct to assume in epidemiological studies that “night shift work” provides the same dose of disturbed chronobiology to all night workers and that disturbed chronobiology from activities outside of work does not count? Both chronobiological theory and supporting evidence suggest that much-needed future epidemiology should address these questions and should consider disturbed chronobiology in all walks of life.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12995-019-0249-6Night workShift workCircadianChronodisruptionCancerBreast
spellingShingle Thomas C. Erren
Peter Morfeld
J. Valérie Groß
Ursula Wild
Philip Lewis
IARC 2019: “Night shift work” is probably carcinogenic: What about disturbed chronobiology in all walks of life?
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
Night work
Shift work
Circadian
Chronodisruption
Cancer
Breast
title IARC 2019: “Night shift work” is probably carcinogenic: What about disturbed chronobiology in all walks of life?
title_full IARC 2019: “Night shift work” is probably carcinogenic: What about disturbed chronobiology in all walks of life?
title_fullStr IARC 2019: “Night shift work” is probably carcinogenic: What about disturbed chronobiology in all walks of life?
title_full_unstemmed IARC 2019: “Night shift work” is probably carcinogenic: What about disturbed chronobiology in all walks of life?
title_short IARC 2019: “Night shift work” is probably carcinogenic: What about disturbed chronobiology in all walks of life?
title_sort iarc 2019 night shift work is probably carcinogenic what about disturbed chronobiology in all walks of life
topic Night work
Shift work
Circadian
Chronodisruption
Cancer
Breast
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12995-019-0249-6
work_keys_str_mv AT thomascerren iarc2019nightshiftworkisprobablycarcinogenicwhataboutdisturbedchronobiologyinallwalksoflife
AT petermorfeld iarc2019nightshiftworkisprobablycarcinogenicwhataboutdisturbedchronobiologyinallwalksoflife
AT jvaleriegroß iarc2019nightshiftworkisprobablycarcinogenicwhataboutdisturbedchronobiologyinallwalksoflife
AT ursulawild iarc2019nightshiftworkisprobablycarcinogenicwhataboutdisturbedchronobiologyinallwalksoflife
AT philiplewis iarc2019nightshiftworkisprobablycarcinogenicwhataboutdisturbedchronobiologyinallwalksoflife