Effect of biodegradable versus nondegradable nasal packings in the outcome of functional endoscopic sinus surgery: clinical and histopathological study

Abstract Background Nasal packing has been used to prevent bleeding and formation of adhesions between the middle turbinate and lateral nasal wall. There has been a debate whether biodegradable packing might improve the outcome, or could a nondegradable dressing offer a better course after endoscopi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ayman Al-Madani, Ahmed Youssef, Ayman Abduljalil, Hoda Khalifa, Mohamed Zahran
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2018-11-01
Series:The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.4103/ejo.ejo_14_18
_version_ 1797204039514980352
author Ayman Al-Madani
Ahmed Youssef
Ayman Abduljalil
Hoda Khalifa
Mohamed Zahran
author_facet Ayman Al-Madani
Ahmed Youssef
Ayman Abduljalil
Hoda Khalifa
Mohamed Zahran
author_sort Ayman Al-Madani
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Nasal packing has been used to prevent bleeding and formation of adhesions between the middle turbinate and lateral nasal wall. There has been a debate whether biodegradable packing might improve the outcome, or could a nondegradable dressing offer a better course after endoscopic sinus surgery. Objective To compare the effect of biodegradable versus nondegradable nasal packings on the outcome of endoscopic sinus surgery on clinical, endoscopic, and histopathologic basis. Patients and Methods Fifty patients with bilateral chronic rhinosinusitis of the same extent of sinus affection were enrolled in this study. None of them was a revision case. All patients had bilateral functional endoscopic sinus surgery by the same surgeon using the same technique of powered microdebrider utilization. At the end of the procedure, the operative cavity of each patient was randomly packed with Merocel as a nondegradable material on one side and a biodegradable material on the other side. We assessed the patients regarding immediate postoperative symptoms and endoscopic follow-up after 1- and 3-month postoperatively including biopsy taking for histopathological examination. Results Postoperative bleeding and patient discomfort were significantly higher in the nondegradable packing side, while biodegradable packing has caused significantly more edema. Merocel packed sides showed better epithelial restoration with marked epithelial hyperplastic changes and more goblet cells than the biodegradable sides. This difference was statistically significant 1-month postoperatively, but turned nonsignificant 3-month postoperatively. Conclusions Biodegradable nasal packing can offer patients a good quality of life during the early recovery period without beneficial or detrimental effects on postoperative mucosal healing. Nondegradable packs offer less post-functional endoscopic sinus surgery edema providing better aeration and rapid wound healing.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T08:28:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3e5e4ac701094528a965daaab8e1ecf9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1012-5574
2090-8539
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T08:28:53Z
publishDate 2018-11-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology
spelling doaj.art-3e5e4ac701094528a965daaab8e1ecf92024-04-16T20:38:14ZengSpringerOpenThe Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology1012-55742090-85392018-11-0134425326510.4103/ejo.ejo_14_18Effect of biodegradable versus nondegradable nasal packings in the outcome of functional endoscopic sinus surgery: clinical and histopathological studyAyman Al-Madani0Ahmed Youssef1Ayman Abduljalil2Hoda Khalifa3Mohamed Zahran4Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria UniversityDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria UniversityDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria UniversityDepartment of Histology and Cell Biology, Alexandria UniversityDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria UniversityAbstract Background Nasal packing has been used to prevent bleeding and formation of adhesions between the middle turbinate and lateral nasal wall. There has been a debate whether biodegradable packing might improve the outcome, or could a nondegradable dressing offer a better course after endoscopic sinus surgery. Objective To compare the effect of biodegradable versus nondegradable nasal packings on the outcome of endoscopic sinus surgery on clinical, endoscopic, and histopathologic basis. Patients and Methods Fifty patients with bilateral chronic rhinosinusitis of the same extent of sinus affection were enrolled in this study. None of them was a revision case. All patients had bilateral functional endoscopic sinus surgery by the same surgeon using the same technique of powered microdebrider utilization. At the end of the procedure, the operative cavity of each patient was randomly packed with Merocel as a nondegradable material on one side and a biodegradable material on the other side. We assessed the patients regarding immediate postoperative symptoms and endoscopic follow-up after 1- and 3-month postoperatively including biopsy taking for histopathological examination. Results Postoperative bleeding and patient discomfort were significantly higher in the nondegradable packing side, while biodegradable packing has caused significantly more edema. Merocel packed sides showed better epithelial restoration with marked epithelial hyperplastic changes and more goblet cells than the biodegradable sides. This difference was statistically significant 1-month postoperatively, but turned nonsignificant 3-month postoperatively. Conclusions Biodegradable nasal packing can offer patients a good quality of life during the early recovery period without beneficial or detrimental effects on postoperative mucosal healing. Nondegradable packs offer less post-functional endoscopic sinus surgery edema providing better aeration and rapid wound healing.http://link.springer.com/article/10.4103/ejo.ejo_14_18biodegradablechronic rhinosinusitisendoscopic sinus surgerynondegradablepostoperative
spellingShingle Ayman Al-Madani
Ahmed Youssef
Ayman Abduljalil
Hoda Khalifa
Mohamed Zahran
Effect of biodegradable versus nondegradable nasal packings in the outcome of functional endoscopic sinus surgery: clinical and histopathological study
The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology
biodegradable
chronic rhinosinusitis
endoscopic sinus surgery
nondegradable
postoperative
title Effect of biodegradable versus nondegradable nasal packings in the outcome of functional endoscopic sinus surgery: clinical and histopathological study
title_full Effect of biodegradable versus nondegradable nasal packings in the outcome of functional endoscopic sinus surgery: clinical and histopathological study
title_fullStr Effect of biodegradable versus nondegradable nasal packings in the outcome of functional endoscopic sinus surgery: clinical and histopathological study
title_full_unstemmed Effect of biodegradable versus nondegradable nasal packings in the outcome of functional endoscopic sinus surgery: clinical and histopathological study
title_short Effect of biodegradable versus nondegradable nasal packings in the outcome of functional endoscopic sinus surgery: clinical and histopathological study
title_sort effect of biodegradable versus nondegradable nasal packings in the outcome of functional endoscopic sinus surgery clinical and histopathological study
topic biodegradable
chronic rhinosinusitis
endoscopic sinus surgery
nondegradable
postoperative
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.4103/ejo.ejo_14_18
work_keys_str_mv AT aymanalmadani effectofbiodegradableversusnondegradablenasalpackingsintheoutcomeoffunctionalendoscopicsinussurgeryclinicalandhistopathologicalstudy
AT ahmedyoussef effectofbiodegradableversusnondegradablenasalpackingsintheoutcomeoffunctionalendoscopicsinussurgeryclinicalandhistopathologicalstudy
AT aymanabduljalil effectofbiodegradableversusnondegradablenasalpackingsintheoutcomeoffunctionalendoscopicsinussurgeryclinicalandhistopathologicalstudy
AT hodakhalifa effectofbiodegradableversusnondegradablenasalpackingsintheoutcomeoffunctionalendoscopicsinussurgeryclinicalandhistopathologicalstudy
AT mohamedzahran effectofbiodegradableversusnondegradablenasalpackingsintheoutcomeoffunctionalendoscopicsinussurgeryclinicalandhistopathologicalstudy