Short-Term Outcomes of Conventional Laparoscopic versus Robot-Assisted Distal Pancreatectomy for Malignancy: Evidence from US National Inpatient Sample, 2005–2018
Background: The primary treatment for pancreatic cancer is surgical resection, and laparoscopic resection offers benefits over open surgery. This study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of robot-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Methods: Data of adults ≥ 20 years o...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2024-02-01
|
| Series: | Cancers |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/16/5/1003 |
| _version_ | 1797264708285235200 |
|---|---|
| author | Jyun-Ming Huang Sheng-Hsien Chen Te-Hung Chen |
| author_facet | Jyun-Ming Huang Sheng-Hsien Chen Te-Hung Chen |
| author_sort | Jyun-Ming Huang |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background: The primary treatment for pancreatic cancer is surgical resection, and laparoscopic resection offers benefits over open surgery. This study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of robot-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Methods: Data of adults ≥ 20 years old with pancreatic cancer who underwent conventional laparoscopic or robot-assisted laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy were extracted from the United States (US) Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) 2005–2018 database. Comorbidities and complications were identified through the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes. Short-term outcomes were compared using logistic regression and included length of hospital stay (LOS), perioperative complications, in-hospital mortality, unfavorable discharge, and total hospital costs. Results: A total of 886 patients were included; 27% received robot-assisted, and 73% received conventional laparoscopic surgery. The mean age of all patients was 65.3 years, and 52% were females. Multivariable analysis revealed that robot-assisted surgery was associated with a significantly reduced risk of perioperative complications (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.45–0.83) compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery. Specifically, robot-assisted surgery was associated with a significantly decreased risk of VTE (aOR = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.14–0.83) and postoperative blood transfusion (aOR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.23–0.61). Robot-assisted surgery was associated with a significantly shorter LOS (0.76 days shorter, 95% CI: −1.43–−0.09) but greater total hospital costs (18,284 USD greater, 95% CI: 4369.03–32,200.70) than conventional laparoscopic surgery. Conclusions: Despite the higher costs, robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy is associated with decreased risk of complications and shorter hospital stays than conventional laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-25T00:33:12Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-3e602653f8bd48b3860ad3cffc3cf7c0 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2072-6694 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-25T00:33:12Z |
| publishDate | 2024-02-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Cancers |
| spelling | doaj.art-3e602653f8bd48b3860ad3cffc3cf7c02024-03-12T16:41:10ZengMDPI AGCancers2072-66942024-02-01165100310.3390/cancers16051003Short-Term Outcomes of Conventional Laparoscopic versus Robot-Assisted Distal Pancreatectomy for Malignancy: Evidence from US National Inpatient Sample, 2005–2018Jyun-Ming Huang0Sheng-Hsien Chen1Te-Hung Chen2Department of Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, No. 2, Yude Rd., North Dist., Taichung City 404327, TaiwanDepartment of Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, No. 2, Yude Rd., North Dist., Taichung City 404327, TaiwanDepartment of Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, No. 2, Yude Rd., North Dist., Taichung City 404327, TaiwanBackground: The primary treatment for pancreatic cancer is surgical resection, and laparoscopic resection offers benefits over open surgery. This study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of robot-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Methods: Data of adults ≥ 20 years old with pancreatic cancer who underwent conventional laparoscopic or robot-assisted laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy were extracted from the United States (US) Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) 2005–2018 database. Comorbidities and complications were identified through the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes. Short-term outcomes were compared using logistic regression and included length of hospital stay (LOS), perioperative complications, in-hospital mortality, unfavorable discharge, and total hospital costs. Results: A total of 886 patients were included; 27% received robot-assisted, and 73% received conventional laparoscopic surgery. The mean age of all patients was 65.3 years, and 52% were females. Multivariable analysis revealed that robot-assisted surgery was associated with a significantly reduced risk of perioperative complications (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.45–0.83) compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery. Specifically, robot-assisted surgery was associated with a significantly decreased risk of VTE (aOR = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.14–0.83) and postoperative blood transfusion (aOR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.23–0.61). Robot-assisted surgery was associated with a significantly shorter LOS (0.76 days shorter, 95% CI: −1.43–−0.09) but greater total hospital costs (18,284 USD greater, 95% CI: 4369.03–32,200.70) than conventional laparoscopic surgery. Conclusions: Despite the higher costs, robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy is associated with decreased risk of complications and shorter hospital stays than conventional laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/16/5/1003pancreatic cancerperioperative complicationsrobot-assisted surgerysurgical outcomes |
| spellingShingle | Jyun-Ming Huang Sheng-Hsien Chen Te-Hung Chen Short-Term Outcomes of Conventional Laparoscopic versus Robot-Assisted Distal Pancreatectomy for Malignancy: Evidence from US National Inpatient Sample, 2005–2018 Cancers pancreatic cancer perioperative complications robot-assisted surgery surgical outcomes |
| title | Short-Term Outcomes of Conventional Laparoscopic versus Robot-Assisted Distal Pancreatectomy for Malignancy: Evidence from US National Inpatient Sample, 2005–2018 |
| title_full | Short-Term Outcomes of Conventional Laparoscopic versus Robot-Assisted Distal Pancreatectomy for Malignancy: Evidence from US National Inpatient Sample, 2005–2018 |
| title_fullStr | Short-Term Outcomes of Conventional Laparoscopic versus Robot-Assisted Distal Pancreatectomy for Malignancy: Evidence from US National Inpatient Sample, 2005–2018 |
| title_full_unstemmed | Short-Term Outcomes of Conventional Laparoscopic versus Robot-Assisted Distal Pancreatectomy for Malignancy: Evidence from US National Inpatient Sample, 2005–2018 |
| title_short | Short-Term Outcomes of Conventional Laparoscopic versus Robot-Assisted Distal Pancreatectomy for Malignancy: Evidence from US National Inpatient Sample, 2005–2018 |
| title_sort | short term outcomes of conventional laparoscopic versus robot assisted distal pancreatectomy for malignancy evidence from us national inpatient sample 2005 2018 |
| topic | pancreatic cancer perioperative complications robot-assisted surgery surgical outcomes |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/16/5/1003 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jyunminghuang shorttermoutcomesofconventionallaparoscopicversusrobotassisteddistalpancreatectomyformalignancyevidencefromusnationalinpatientsample20052018 AT shenghsienchen shorttermoutcomesofconventionallaparoscopicversusrobotassisteddistalpancreatectomyformalignancyevidencefromusnationalinpatientsample20052018 AT tehungchen shorttermoutcomesofconventionallaparoscopicversusrobotassisteddistalpancreatectomyformalignancyevidencefromusnationalinpatientsample20052018 |