Comparison of saddle contoured metal matrix and pre-contoured self-adhesive matrix in composite resin class II restorations; an in vivo study

Objective: To evaluate composite class II restoration proximal contacts and contours by comparing saddle-contoured metal matrix and pre-contoured self-adhesive matrix system. Method: The randomised controlled trial (NCT05414656) was conducted at the Department of Operative Dentistry, School of De...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nosheen Sarwar, Sheharyar Akhtar khokhar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Pakistan Medical Association 2024-01-01
Series:Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ojs.jpma.org.pk/index.php/public_html/article/view/8627
_version_ 1797219451432599552
author Nosheen Sarwar
Sheharyar Akhtar khokhar
author_facet Nosheen Sarwar
Sheharyar Akhtar khokhar
author_sort Nosheen Sarwar
collection DOAJ
description Objective: To evaluate composite class II restoration proximal contacts and contours by comparing saddle-contoured metal matrix and pre-contoured self-adhesive matrix system. Method: The randomised controlled trial (NCT05414656) was conducted at the Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad, Pakistan, from May to October 2022, and comprises the patients having supra-gingival class II cavities. They were randomised into class II restoration with saddle-contoured matrix band group A, and restoration with pre-contoured self-adhesive matrix group B.  The tightness of proximal contacts was evaluated using the Fédération Dentaire Internationale criteria and the quality of proximal contours was assessed using clinical and radiographic examination. Data was analysed using SPSS 16. Results: Of the 60 subjects, 42(70%) were females and 18(30%) were males. The overall mean age was 38.03±15.33 years. There were 30(50%) subjects in each of the 2 groups. The highest restoration was needed in the upper premolar 20(33.3%). The tightness of proximal contact was not significantly different between the groups (p=0.94). Clinical examination for production of good contours was higher in group A compared to group B, but the difference was not significant (p>0.05). Conclusion: There was no significant difference between saddle-contoured metal matrix and pre-contoured self-adhesive matrix for composite class II restoration proximal contacts and contours. Clinical Trial Link: https://clinicaltrials.gov RCT (NCT05414656) Key Words: Dental restoration, Composite resin, Dental caries, Matrix bands.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T12:33:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3e6a911656e94b47947bc6a35c5e75bb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0030-9982
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T12:33:51Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Pakistan Medical Association
record_format Article
series Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association
spelling doaj.art-3e6a911656e94b47947bc6a35c5e75bb2024-04-07T16:28:18ZengPakistan Medical AssociationJournal of the Pakistan Medical Association0030-99822024-01-01742Comparison of saddle contoured metal matrix and pre-contoured self-adhesive matrix in composite resin class II restorations; an in vivo studyNosheen Sarwar0Sheharyar Akhtar khokhar1Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad, PakistanPakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad, Pakistan Objective: To evaluate composite class II restoration proximal contacts and contours by comparing saddle-contoured metal matrix and pre-contoured self-adhesive matrix system. Method: The randomised controlled trial (NCT05414656) was conducted at the Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad, Pakistan, from May to October 2022, and comprises the patients having supra-gingival class II cavities. They were randomised into class II restoration with saddle-contoured matrix band group A, and restoration with pre-contoured self-adhesive matrix group B.  The tightness of proximal contacts was evaluated using the Fédération Dentaire Internationale criteria and the quality of proximal contours was assessed using clinical and radiographic examination. Data was analysed using SPSS 16. Results: Of the 60 subjects, 42(70%) were females and 18(30%) were males. The overall mean age was 38.03±15.33 years. There were 30(50%) subjects in each of the 2 groups. The highest restoration was needed in the upper premolar 20(33.3%). The tightness of proximal contact was not significantly different between the groups (p=0.94). Clinical examination for production of good contours was higher in group A compared to group B, but the difference was not significant (p>0.05). Conclusion: There was no significant difference between saddle-contoured metal matrix and pre-contoured self-adhesive matrix for composite class II restoration proximal contacts and contours. Clinical Trial Link: https://clinicaltrials.gov RCT (NCT05414656) Key Words: Dental restoration, Composite resin, Dental caries, Matrix bands. http://ojs.jpma.org.pk/index.php/public_html/article/view/8627Dental restorationComposite resinDental cariesMatrix bands
spellingShingle Nosheen Sarwar
Sheharyar Akhtar khokhar
Comparison of saddle contoured metal matrix and pre-contoured self-adhesive matrix in composite resin class II restorations; an in vivo study
Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association
Dental restoration
Composite resin
Dental caries
Matrix bands
title Comparison of saddle contoured metal matrix and pre-contoured self-adhesive matrix in composite resin class II restorations; an in vivo study
title_full Comparison of saddle contoured metal matrix and pre-contoured self-adhesive matrix in composite resin class II restorations; an in vivo study
title_fullStr Comparison of saddle contoured metal matrix and pre-contoured self-adhesive matrix in composite resin class II restorations; an in vivo study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of saddle contoured metal matrix and pre-contoured self-adhesive matrix in composite resin class II restorations; an in vivo study
title_short Comparison of saddle contoured metal matrix and pre-contoured self-adhesive matrix in composite resin class II restorations; an in vivo study
title_sort comparison of saddle contoured metal matrix and pre contoured self adhesive matrix in composite resin class ii restorations an in vivo study
topic Dental restoration
Composite resin
Dental caries
Matrix bands
url http://ojs.jpma.org.pk/index.php/public_html/article/view/8627
work_keys_str_mv AT nosheensarwar comparisonofsaddlecontouredmetalmatrixandprecontouredselfadhesivematrixincompositeresinclassiirestorationsaninvivostudy
AT sheharyarakhtarkhokhar comparisonofsaddlecontouredmetalmatrixandprecontouredselfadhesivematrixincompositeresinclassiirestorationsaninvivostudy